Midwifery work and the making of narrative

Nursing Inquiry

Volumn 9, Issue 1, 2002, Pages 37-42

  Maher, Jane Maree ^a   Souter, Kay Torney ^b  

^a MONASH UNIVERSITY   (Australia)

^b LA TROBE UNIVERSITY   (Australia)

Author keywords

Birth experience; Midwives; Narrative; Support people

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; AUSTRALIA; CLINICAL TRIAL; FEMALE; HUMAN; INTERPERSONAL COMMUNICATION; LABOR; MIDWIFE; MULTICENTER STUDY; NURSE PATIENT RELATIONSHIP; PREGNANCY; PSYCHOLOGICAL ASPECT; SOCIAL SUPPORT;

COMMUNICATION; FEMALE; HUMANS; LABOR, OBSTETRIC; MIDWIFERY; NURSE-PATIENT RELATIONS; PREGNANCY; SOCIAL SUPPORT; VICTORIA;

EID: 0036490688     PISSN: 13207881     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1046/j.1440-1800.2002.00123.x     Document Type: Article

References (5)

1. Bourgeault I and M McDonald. 2000. The politics of representation: Doing and writing 'interested' research on midwifery. Resources for Feminist Research: Documentation sur la Recherche Feminist 28(1/2): 151-68.
2. Curti L. 1998. Female stories, female bodies: Narrative, identity and representation. New York: New York University Press.
3. Davidoff L. 1998. Regarding some 'old husbands' tales': Public and private in feminist history. In Feminism, the public and the private, ed. JB Landis, 164-94. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
4. Miller T. 1998. Shifting layers of professional, lay and personal narratives: Longitudinal childbirth research. In Feminist dilemmas in qualitative research: Public knowledge and private lives, eds J Ribbens and R Edwards, 58-71. London: Sage Publications.
5. Reiger K. 2001. Our bodies, our babies: The forgotten women's movement. Melbourne: Melbourne University Press.