Effects of paper birch condensed tannin on whitemarked tussock moth (Lepidoptera: Lymantriidae) performance

Environmental Entomology

Volumn 31, Issue 1, 2002, Pages 10-14

  Kopper, Brian J ^a   Jakobi, Valerie N ^a,b   Osier, Tod L ^a,c   Lindroth, Richard L ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN MADISON   (United States)

^b Limited ^*  (United States)

^c FAIRFIELD UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

Betula papyrifera; Condensed tannin; Orgyia leucostigma; Paper birch; Whitemarked tussock moth

Indexed keywords

CHEMICAL DEFENSE; LARVAL DEVELOPMENT; PLANT-HERBIVORE INTERACTION; TANNIN;

ANIMALIA; BETULA; BETULA PAPYRIFERA; HEMEROCAMPA LEUCOSTIGMA; HEXAPODA; INSECTA; LEPIDOPTERA; LYMANTRIIDAE; ORGYIA; ORGYIA LEUCOSTIGMA;

EID: 0036488283     PISSN: 0046225X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1603/0046-225X-31.1.10     Document Type: Article

References (29)

1. 2 and light. Ecol. Bull. 47: 84-95.
2. 2 and light on tree phytochemistry and insect performance. Oikos 88: 259-272.
3. Ayres, M. P., T. P. Clausen, S. F. MacLean, Jr., A. M. Redman, and P. B. Reichardt. 1997. Diversity of structure and antiherbivore activity in condensed tannins. Ecology 78: 1696-1712.
4. Bate-Smith, E. C., and C. R. Metcalfe. 1957. Leucoanthocyanins. 3. The nature and systematic distribution of tannins in dicotyledonous plants. J. Linn. Soc. 55: 669-705.
5. Bryant, J. P., P. B. Reichardt, T. P. Clausen, and R. A. Werner. 1993. Effects of mineral nutrition on delayed inducible resistance in Alaska paper birch. Ecology 74: 2072-2084.
6. Covell, C. V. Jr. 1984. A field guide to moths of eastern North America. Houghton Mifflin, New York.
7. Erelli, M. C., M. P. Ayres, and G. K. Eaton. 1998. Altitudinal patterns in host suitability for forest insects. Oecologia 117: 133-142.
8. Farrar, R. R., Jr., J. D. Barbour, and G. G. Kennedy. 1989. Quantifying food consumption and growth in insects. Ann. Entomol. Soc. Am. 82: 593-598.
9. Hagerman, A. E. and L. G. Butler. 1980. Condensed tannin purification and characterization of tannin associated proteins. J. Agric. Food Chem. 28: 947-952.
10. Hemming, J.D.C., and R. L. Lindroth. 1995. Intraspecific variation in aspen phytochemistry: effects on performance of gypsy moth and forest tent caterpillars. Oecologia 103: 79-88.
11. Hwang, S. Y., and R. L. Lindroth. 1997. Clonal variation in foliar chemistry of aspen: Effects on gypsy moths and forest tent caterpillars. Oecologia 111: 99-108.
12. Hwang, S. Y., and R. L. Lindroth. 1998. Consequences of clonal variation in aspen phytochemistry for late season folivores. Ecoscience 5: 508-516.
13. Kleiner, K. W., and M. E. Montgomery. 1994. Forest stand susceptibility to the gypsy moth (Lepidoptera: Lymantriidae): species and site effects on foliage quality to larvae. Environ. Entomol. 23: 699-711.
14. Klocke, J. A., and B. G. Chan. 1982. Effects of cotton condensed tannin on feeding and digestion of the cotton pest, Heliothis zea. J. Insect Physiol. 28: 911-915.
15. 3 effects on paper birch (Betulaceae: Betula papyrifera Marsh.) phytochemistry and white marked tussock moth (Lymantriidae: Orgyia leucostigma J. E. Smith) performance. Environ. Entomol. (in press).
16. 2 atmospheres. Funct. Ecol. 9: 306-311.
17. Littell, R. C., G. A. Milliken, W. W. Stroup, and R. D. Wolfinger. 1996. SAS system for mixed models. SAS Institute, Cary, NC.
18. Maddrell, S.H.P., and B.O.C. Gardiner. 1976. Excretion of alkaloids by Malpighian tubules of insects. J. Exp. Biol. 64: 755-761.
19. Manuwoto, S., and J. M. Scriber. 1986. Effects of hydrolyzable and condensed tannin on growth and development of two species of polyphagous Lepidoptera, Spodoptera eridania and Callosamia promethea. Oecologia 69: 225-230.
20. Mole, S. 1993. The systematic distribution of tannins in the leaves of Angiosperms: a tool for ecological studies. Biochem. Syst. Ecol. 21: 833-846.
21. Porter, L. J., L. N. Hrstich, and B. G. Chan. 1986. The conversion of procyanidins and prodelphinidins to cyanidin and delphinidin. Phytochemistry 25: 223-230.
22. Price, P. W., C. E. Bouton, P. Gross, B. A. McPheron, J. N. Thompson, and A. E. Weis. 1980. Interactions among three trophic levels: influence of plants on interactions between insect herbivores and natural enemies. Annu. Rev. Ecol. Syst. 11: 41-65.
23. Raubenheimer, D., and S. J. Simpson. 1992. Analysis of covariance: an alternative to nutritional indices. Entomol. Exp. Appl. 62: 221-231.
24. Reese, J. C., B. G. Chan, and A. C. Waiss Jr. 1982. Effects of cotton condensed tannin, maysin (corn), and pinitol (soybean) on Heliothis zea growth and development. J. Chem. Ecol. 8: 1429-1436.
25. Rossiter, M. C., J. C. Schultz, and I. T. Baldwin. 1988. Relationships among defoliation, red oak phenolics, and gypsy moth growth and reproduction. Ecology 69: 267-277.
26. 2-mediated changes in paper birch and white pine chemistry on gypsy moth performance. Oecologia 98: 133-138.
27. SAS Institute. 1989. SAS user's guide: statistics, 5th ed. SAS Institute, Cary, NC.
28. Scriber, J. M. 1977. Limiting effects of low leaf-water content on the nitrogen utilization, energy budget, and larval growth of Hyalophora cecropia (Lepidoptera: Saturniidae). Oecologia 28: 269-287.
29. Waldbauer, G. P. 1968. The consumption and utilization of food by insects. Adv. Insect Physiol. 5: 229-289.