3D electrical imaging of known targets at a controlled environmental test site

Environmental Geology

Volumn 41, Issue 6, 2002, Pages 690-704

  Chambers, Jonathan E ^a,b   Ogilvy, R D ^a   Kuras, O ^a,c   Cripps, J C ^b   Meldrum, P I ^a  

^a BRITISH GEOLOGICAL SURVEY   (United Kingdom)

^b UNIVERSITY OF SHEFFIELD   (United Kingdom)

^c UNIVERSITY OF NOTTINGHAM   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

3D inversion; Brownfield; Chargeability; Controlled testing Electrical tomography Survey design Resistivity; Site investigation

Indexed keywords

ELECTRIC CONDUCTIVITY; ELECTRIC IMPEDANCE TOMOGRAPHY; ELECTRODES; MATHEMATICAL MODELS;

BROWNFIELD LAND;

IMAGING TECHNIQUES;

BROWNFIELD SITE; CONTAMINATED LAND; ELECTRICAL METHOD; GEOPHYSICAL ARRAY; GEOPHYSICAL METHOD; TOMOGRAPHY;

EID: 0036487940     PISSN: 09430105     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s00254-001-0452-4     Document Type: Article

References (31)

1. Aristodemou E, Thomas-Betts A (2000) DC resistivity and induced polarisation investigations at a waste disposal site and its environments. J Appl Geophys 44:275-302
2. Barry D (1991) Hazards in land recycling. In: Fleming G (ed) Recycling derelict land. Thomas Telford, London, pp 28-63
3. Bernstone C, Dahlin T, Ohlsson T, Hogland W (2000) DC-resistivity mapping of internal landfill structure: Two pre-excavation surveys. Environ Geol 39:360-371
4. Brunner I, Friedel S, Jacobs F, Danckwardt E (1999) Investigation of a Tertiary maar structure using three-dimensional resistivity imaging. Geophys J Int 136:771-780
5. Chambers J, Ogilvy R, Meldrum P (1999) 3D resistivity imaging of buried oil- and tar-contaminated waste deposits. Eur J Environ Eng Geophys 4:3-14
6. Chambers JE (2001) The Application of 3D Electrical Tomography to the Investigation of Brownfield Sites. PhD Thesis, University of Sheffield
7. Constable SC, Parker RL, Constable CG (1987) Occam's inversion: A practical algorithm for generating smooth models from electromagnetic sounding data. Geophysics 52:289-300
8. Dahlin T, Bernstone C (1997) A roll-along technique for 3D resistivity data acquisition with multi-electrode arrays. In: Proc SAGEEP'97 (Symposium on the Application of Geophysics to Engineering and Environmental Problems). Engineering and Environmental Geophys Society, Wheat Ridge, USA, pp 927-935
9. Dahlin T, Loke MH (1997) Quasi-3D resistivity imaging - mapping of three dimensional structures using two dimensional resistivity techniques. In: Proceedings 3rd Meeting Environmental and Engineering Geophysics. Environmental and Engineering Geophysical Society, European Section, Aarhus, Denmark, pp 143-146
10. Daily W, Ramirez AL (2000) Electrical imaging of engineered hydraulic barriers. Geophysics 65:83-94
11. Griffiths DH, Barker RD (1993) Two-dimensional resistivity imaging and modelling in areas of complex geology. J Appl Geophys 29:211-226
12. Li Y, Oldenburg DW (1992) Approximate inverse mappings in DC resistivity problems. Geophys J Int 109:343-362
13. Lines LR, Treitel S (1984) Tutorial: a review of least-squares inversion and its application to geophysical problems. Geophys Prospect 32:159-186
14. Loke MH, Barker RD (1995) Least-squares deconvolution of apparent resistivity pseudosections. Geophysics 60:1682-1690
15. Loke MH, Barker RD (1996a) Practical techniques for 3D resistivity surveys and data inversion. Geophysics 44:499-523
16. Loke MH, Barker RD (1996b) Rapid least-squares inversion of apparent resistivity pseudosections by a quasi-Newton method. Geophys Prospect 44:131-152
17. Maillol JM, Seguin M-K, Gupta OP, Akhauri HM, Sen N (1999) Electrical resistivity tomography survey for delineating uncharted mine galleries in West Bengal, India. Geophys Prospect 47:103-116
18. Ogilvy R, Meldrum P, Chambers J (1999) Imaging of industrial waste deposits and buried quarry geometry by 3-D resistivity tomography. Eur J Environ Eng Geophys 3:103-113
19. Olayinka AI, Yaramanci U (2000) Assessment of the reliability of 2D inversion of apparent resistivity data. Geophys Prospect 48:293-316
20. Oldenburg DW, Li Y (1994) Inversion of induced polarisation data. Geophysics 59:1327-1341
21. Pelton WH, Rijo L, Swift CM (1978) Inversion of two-dimensional resistivity and induced polarization data. Geophysics 43:788-803
22. Ramirez A, Daily W, Binley A, Labrecque D (1999) Electrical impedance tomography of known targets. J Environ Eng Geophys 4:11-26
23. Reynolds JM, Taylor DI (1995) The use of geophysical surveys during the planning, construction and remediation of landfills. In: Bentley S (ed) Engineering Geology of Waste Storage and Disposal. Geological Society Engineering Geology Special Publication no 11, The Geological Society, London, pp 93-98
24. Reynolds JM (1997) An Introduction to Applied and Environmental Geophysics. Wiley, Chichester
25. Sasaki Y (1992) Resolution of resistivity tomography inferred from numerical simulation. Geophys Prospect 40:453-463
26. Sasaki Y (1994) 3-D resistivity inversion using the finite element method. Geophysics 59:1839-1848
27. Seigel HO (1959) Mathematical formulation and type curves for induced polarization. Geophysics 24:547-565
28. Slater LD, Sandberg SK (2000) Resistivity and induced polarization monitoring of salt transport under natural hydraulic gradients. Geophysics 65:408-420
29. Sumner JS (1976) Principles of Induced Polarization for Geophysical Exploration. Elsevier, Amsterdam
30. Weller A, Frangos W, Seichter M (1999) Three-dimensional inversion of induced polarization data from simulated waste. J Appl Geophys 41:31-47
31. Yuval, Oldenburg DW (1996) DC resistivity and IP methods in acid mine drainage problems: Results from the Copper Cliff mine railings impoundments. J Appl Geophys 34:187-198