Acceptability of personal hormone monitoring for contraception: Longitudinal and contextual variables

Journal of Social Psychology

Volumn 142, Issue 1, 2002, Pages 87-96

  Severy, Lawrence J ^a   Klein, Cynthia T F ^a   McNulty, James ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF FLORIDA   (United States)

Author keywords

Acceptability; Contextual variables; Contraception; Personal hormone monitoring; Time; Women

Indexed keywords

CONTRACEPTIVE AGENT;

ADULT; ARTICLE; ATTITUDE TO HEALTH; CONSUMER; FAMILY PLANNING; FEMALE; HUMAN; LONGITUDINAL STUDY; MALE; METHODOLOGY; PSYCHOLOGICAL ASPECT; QUESTIONNAIRE; SEX DIFFERENCE; SEXUAL BEHAVIOR; TIME; UNITED KINGDOM;

ADULT; ATTITUDE TO HEALTH; CONSUMER SATISFACTION; CONTRACEPTION BEHAVIOR; CONTRACEPTIVE AGENTS, FEMALE; ENGLAND; FAMILY PLANNING SERVICES; FEMALE; HUMANS; LONGITUDINAL STUDIES; MALE; QUESTIONNAIRES; SEX FACTORS; TIME FACTORS; WOMEN;

EID: 0036484225     PISSN: 00224545     EISSN: 19401183     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/00224540209603887     Document Type: Article

References (10)

1. Askew, I. (1994). Future directions for family planning research: Towards a greater appreciation of psychosocial issues. In L. J. Severy (Ed.), Advances in population: Psychosocial perspectives (Vol. 2, pp. 141-170). London: Kingsley.
2. Bonnar, J., Flynn, A., Freundl, G., Kirkman, R., Royston, R., & Snowden, R. (1999). Personal hormone monitoring for contraception. The British Journal of Family Planning, 24, 128-134.
3. Cleiand, J., Hardy, E., & Taucher, E. (1990). Introduction of new contraceptives into family planning programmes: Guidelines for social science research. Geneva, Switzerland: World Health Organization.
4. Darroch, J. E., & Frost, J. J. (1999). Women's interest in vaginal microbicides. Family Planning Perspectives, 31, 16-23.
5. Keller, A. (1979). Contraceptive acceptability research: Utility and limitations. Studies in Family Planning, 10, 230-241.
6. Marshall, J. (1977). Acceptability of fertility regulating methods: Designing technology to fit people. Preventive Medicine, 6, 65-73.
7. Severy, L. J. (1982). Contraceptive decisions: Spousal relationships, method commitment and expectancy-value (Tech. Rep.). Washington, DC: Center for Population Research, National Institute for Child Health and Human Development.
8. Severy, L. J. (1999). Acceptability as a critical component of clinical trials. In L. J. Severy & W. B. Miller (Eds.), Advances in population: Psychosocial perspectives (Vol. 3, pp. 103-122). London: Kingsley.
9. Severy, L. J., & Silver, S. E. (1993). Two reasonable people: Joint decision-making in fertility regulation. In L. J. Severy (Ed.), Advances in population: Psychosocial perspectives (Vol. 1, pp. 207-228). London: Kingsley.
10. Snowden, R. (1996). Human reproductive behavior: General principles. In J. Bonnar (Ed.), Natural contraception through personal hormone monitoring: Proceedings of a symposium held at the 14 th FIGO (International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics) World Congress of Gynecology and Obstetrics (pp. 45-53). New York: Parthenon.