Afterword: The past, present, and future of applied pretrial publicity research

Law and Human Behavior

Volumn 26, Issue 1, 2002, Pages 127-133

  Fulero, Solomon M ^a  

^a Sinclair College   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

BEHAVIORAL RESEARCH; COURT; CRIMINAL JUSTICE; EMPIRICAL RESEARCH; HUMAN; LAW ENFORCEMENT; MASS MEDIUM; REVIEW; ARTICLE; CONFIDENTIALITY; CRIMINAL LAW; FORECASTING; LEGAL ASPECT; PUBLIC OPINION; RESEARCH; SOCIAL PSYCHOLOGY; UNITED STATES;

CONFIDENTIALITY; CRIMINAL LAW; FORECASTING; HUMANS; MASS MEDIA; PREJUDICE; PUBLIC OPINION; RESEARCH; UNITED STATES;

EID: 0036481728     PISSN: 01477307     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1023/A:1013885309899     Document Type: Review

References (36)

1. American Bar Association. (1968). Standards relating to the administration of justice, fair trial, and free press. Chicago, IL: Author.
2. Arnold, S., & Gold, A. (1978-1979). The use of a public opinion poll on a change of venue application. Criminal Law Quarterly, 21, 445-464.
3. Constantini, E., & King, J. (1980-1981). The partial juror: Correlates and causes of prejudgment. Law and Society Review, 15, 9-40.
4. DeLuca, A. (1979). Tipping the scales of justice: The effects of pretrial publicity. Unpublished master's thesis, Iowa State University, Ames.
5. Dexter, H. R., Cutler, B. R., & Moran, G. (1992). A test of voir dire as a remedy for the prejudicial effects of pretrial publicity. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 22, 819-832.
6. Fulero, S. (1987). The role of behavioral research in the Free Press/ Fair Trial controversy. Law and Human Behavior, 11, 259-264.
7. Greene, E. L., & Loftus, E. F. (1984). What's new in the news? The influence of well-publicized news events on psychological research and courtroom trials. Basic and Applied Social Psychology, 5, 211-221.
8. Greene, E. L., & Wade, R. (1987). Of private talk and public print: General pretrial publicity and juror decision-making. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 1, 1-13.
9. Hoiberg, B., & Stires, L. (1973). The effect of several types of pretrial publicity on the guilt attributions of simulated jurors. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 3, 267-271.
10. Horowitz, I., & Willging, T. (1984). The Psychology of Law. Boston: Little, Brown.
11. Hvistendahl, J. (1979). The effect of placement of biasing information. Journalism Quarterly, 56, 863-865.
12. Keelin, J. (1979). An experimental study of the effect of prejudicial pretrial publicity on jury verdicts. Unpublished master's thesis, Indiana University, Bloomington.
13. Kerr, N. L., Kramer, G. P., Carroll, J. S., & Alfini, J. J. (1991). On the effectiveness of voir dire in criminal cases with prejudicial pretrial publicity: An empirical study. The American University Law Review, 40, 665-701.
14. Kline, F., & Jess, P. (1966). Prejudicial publicity: Its effects on law school mock juries. Journalism Quarterly, 43, 113-116.
15. Kramer, G. P., Kerr, N. L., & Carroll, J. S. (1990). Pretrial publicity, judicial remedies, and jury bias. Law and Human Behavior, 14, 409-438.
16. Linz, D., & Penrod, S. (1992). Exploring the First and Sixth Amendments: Pretrial publicity and jury decision-making. In D. Kagehiro & W. Laufer (Eds.), Handbook of Psychology and Law (pp. 3-20). New York: Springer.
17. Moran, G., & Cutler, B. L. (1991). The prejudicial impact of pretrial publicity. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 21, 345-367.
18. Nietzel, M., & Dillehay, R. (1985). Psychologists as consultants for change of venue: The use of public opinion surveys. Law and Human Behavior, 7, 309-336.
19. Nietzel, M., & Dillehay, R. (1986). Psychological consultation in the courtroom. New York: Pergamon.
20. Otto, A. L., Dexter, H. R., & Penrod, S. D. (1991). Pretrial publicity and jury decisionmaking: Experimental studies with actual cases. Unpublished manuscript, University of Minnesota.
21. Otto, A. L., Penrod, S. D., & Dexter, H. R. (1994). The biasing impact of pretrial publicity on juror judgments. Law and Human Behavior, 18, 453-470.
22. Otto, A. L., Penrod, S. D., & Hirt, E. R. (1991). The influence of pretrial publicity on juror judgments in civil cases. Unpublished manuscript, University of Minnesota.
23. Padawer-Singer, A., & Barton, A. (1975). Free press, fair trial. In R. Simon (Ed.), The jury system: A critical analysis. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.
24. Pollock, A. (1977). The use of public opinion polls to obtain changes of venue and continuance in criminal trials. Criminal Justice Journal, 1, 269-288.
25. Riley, S. G. (1973). Pretrial publicity: A field study. Journalism Quarterly, 50, 17-23.
26. State of Ohio v. Benasutti, 1996 Ohio App. (1996) (LEXIS 3091).
27. State of Ohio v. Montgomery, 61 Ohio St.3d 410, 575 N.E.2d 167, 1991 (1991) (LEXIS 1955).
28. State of Ohio v. Swiger, 5 Ohio St.2d 151, 34 O.O.2d 270, 214 N.E.2d 417 (1966).
29. Sue, S., Smith, R., & Gilbert, R. (1974). Biasing effect of pretrial publicity on judicial decisions. Journal of Criminal Justice, 2, 163-171.
30. Sue, S., Smith, R., & Pedroza, G. (1975). Authoritarianism, pretrial publicity, and awareness of bias in simulated jurors. Psychological Reports, 37, 1299-1302.
31. Tans, M., & Chaffee, S. (1966). Pretrial publicity and juror prejudice. Journalism Quarterly, 43, 647-654.
32. Thompson, W. C., Fong, G. T., & Rosenhan, D. C. (1981). Inadmissible evidence and juror verdicts. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 40, 453-463.
33. Vidmar, N., & Judson, J. (1981). The use of social sciences in a change of venue application. Canadian Bar Review, 59, 76-102.
34. Wilcox, W., & McCombs, M. (1967). Crime story elements and fair trial-free press. Unpublished paper, University of California, Berkeley.
35. Wrightsman, L., Nietzel, M., & Fortune, W. (1994). Psychology and the legal system (4th ed.). Pacific Grove, CA: Brooks-Cole Publishing.
36. Zanzola, L. (1977). Effects of pretrial publicity on the verdicts of jurors and juries. Unpublished master's thesis, Northern Illinois University.