The impact of metrical structure on performance stability in bimanual 1:3 tapping

Psychological Research

Volumn 66, Issue 1, 2002, Pages 50-59

  Semjen, Andras ^a   Vos, Piet G ^b  

^a CNRS   (France)

^b RADBOUD UNIVERSITY NIJMEGEN   (Netherlands)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ARTICLE; ATTENTION; FEMALE; HEMISPHERIC DOMINANCE; HUMAN; MALE; MOTOR ACTIVITY; PSYCHOPHYSICS; TIME PERCEPTION;

ADULT; ATTENTION; FEMALE; FUNCTIONAL LATERALITY; HUMANS; MALE; MOTOR ACTIVITY; PSYCHOPHYSICS; TIME PERCEPTION;

EID: 0036480978     PISSN: 03400727     EISSN: 14302772     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s004260100073     Document Type: Article

References (18)

1. Billon, M., Semjen, A., & Stelmach, G. E. (1996). The timing effects of accent production in periodic finger-tapping sequences. Journal of Motor Behavior, 28, 198-210.
2. Clarke, E. F. (1985). Structure and expression in rhythmic performance. In P. Howell, I. Cross & R. West (Eds.), Musical structure and cognition. London: Academic Press.
3. Essens, P. (1995). Structuring temporal sequences: comparison of models and factors of complexity. Perception and Psychophysics, 57, 519-532.
4. Haken, H., Kelso, J. A. S., & Bunz, H. (1985). A theoretical model of phase transitions in human hand movements. Biological Cybernetics, 51, 347-356.
5. Heuer, H. (1993). Structural constraints on bimanual movements. Psychological Research, 55, 83-98.
6. Jones, M. R. (1990). Musical events and models of musical time. In R. A. Block (Ed.), Cognitive models of psychological time (pp. 207-240). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
7. Krampe, R. T., Kliegl, R., Mayr, U., Engbert, R., & Vorberg, D. (2000). The fast and the slow of skilled bimanual rhythm production: parallel versus integrated timing. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 26, 206-233.
8. Lee, C. S. (1991). The perception of metrical structure: experimental evidence and a model. In: P. Howell, R. West & I. Cross (Eds.), Representing musical structure (pp. 59-127). New York: Academic Press.
9. Martin, J. G. (1972). Rhythmic (hierarchical) versus serial structure in speech and other behavior. Psychological Review, 79, 487-509.
10. Peters, M. (1985). Constraints in the performance of bimanual tasks and their expression in unskilled and skilled subjects. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 37A, 171-196.
11. Repp, B.H. (1999). Relationships between performance timing, perception of timing perturbations, and perceptual-motor synchronization in two Chopin preludes. Australian Journal of Psychology, 51, 188-203.
12. Semjen, A., Schulze, H. H., & Vorberg, D. (2000) Timing precision in continuation and synchronization tapping. Psychological Research, 63, 137-147.
13. Semjen, A., & Summers, J. J. (in press). Timing goals in bimanual coordination. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology.
14. Sloboda, J. A. (1983). The communication of musical metre in piano performance. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 35A, 377-396.
15. Vorberg, D., & Hambuch, R. (1984). Timing of two-handed rhythmic performance. Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences, 423, 390-406.
16. Vorberg, D., & Wing, A. (1996). Modeling variability and dependence in timing. In: H. Heuer & S. W. Keele (Eds.), Handbook of perception and action. Vol. 3: Motor Skills (pp. 181-262). London: Academic Press.
17. Vorberg, D., & Schulze, H. H. (in press). The two-level timing model for synchronization. Journal of Mathematical Psychology.
18. Vos, G. P., & Handel, S. (1987). Playing triplets: facts and preferences. In: A. Gabrielsson (Ed.), Action and perception in rhythm and music. Publications issued by the Royal Swedish Academy of Music, 55, pp. 35-47.