Using Matlab to generate families of similar Attneave shapes

Behavior Research Methods, Instruments, and Computers

Volumn 34, Issue 1, 2002, Pages 55-68

  Collin, Charles A ^a   McMullen, Patricia A ^a  

^a DALHOUSIE UNIVERSITY   (Canada)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ALGORITHM; ARTICLE; AUTOMATED PATTERN RECOGNITION; COMPUTER GRAPHICS; COMPUTER PROGRAM; RANDOMIZATION;

ALGORITHMS; COMPUTER GRAPHICS; PATTERN RECOGNITION, AUTOMATED; RANDOM ALLOCATION; SOFTWARE;

EID: 0036480813     PISSN: 07433808     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.3758/BF03195424     Document Type: Article

References (13)

1. ATTNEAVE, F. (1957). Physical determinants of the judged complexity of shapes. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 53, 221-227.
2. ATTNEAVE, R. & ARNOULT, M. D. (1956). The quantitative study of shape and pattern perception. Psychological Bulletin, 53, 452-471.
3. BETHELL-FOX, C. E., & SHEPARD, R. N. (1988). Mental rotation: Effects of stimulus complexity and familiarity. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance, 14, 12-23.
4. COOPER, L. A. (1975). Mental rotation of random two-dimensional shapes. Cognitive Psychology, 7, 20-43.
5. COOPER, L. A., & PODGORNY, P. (1976). Mental transformations and visual comparison processes: Effects of complexity and similarity. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance, 2, 503-514.
6. CORNOLDI, C., & LONGONI, A. (1977). The MP-DP effect and the influence of distinct repetitions on recognition. Italian Journal of Psychology, 4, 65-76.
7. FOLK, M. D., & LUCE, R. D. (1987). Effects of stimulus complexity on mental rotation rate of polygons. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance, 13, 395-404.
8. GARNER, W. R. (1970). Good patterns have few alternatives. American Scientist, 58, 34-42.
9. KLEIN, R. (1982). Patterns of perceived similarity cannot be generalized from long to short exposure durations and vice versa. Perception & Psychophysics, 32, 15-18.
10. MARSOLEK, C. J. (1996). Dissociable neural subsystems underlie abstract and specific object recognition. Psychological Science, 10, 111-118.
11. POSNER, M. I., & KEELE, S. W. (1968). On the genesis of abstract ideas. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 77, 353-363.
12. WILLIS, E., & DORNBUSH, R. L. (1968). Preference for visual complexity. Child Development, 39, 639-646.
13. WU, Z., SUN, C., WU, Z., & XU, S. (1991). Age differences in the imagination of figures. Psychological Science [China], 2, 1-6.