The rare Lu:-6 phenotype in Israel and the clinical significance of anti-Lu6

Transfusion

Volumn 42, Issue 2, 2002, Pages 247-250

  Yahalom, Vered ^a,b,c,d,e   Ellis, Martin H ^a,b,c,d,e   Poole, Joyce ^a,b,c,d,e   Rahimi Levene, Naomi ^a,b,c,d,e   Shinar, Eilat ^a,b,c,d,e   DaCosta, Yehudit ^a,b,c,d,e   Manny, Noga ^a,b,c,d,e   Levene, Cyril ^a,b,c,d,e  

^a MAGEN DAVID ADOM   (Israel)

^b MEIR MEDICAL CENTER   (Israel)

^c NHS BLOOD AND TRANSPLANT   (United Kingdom)

^d ASSAF HAROFEH MEDICAL CENTER   (Israel)

^e HADASSAH HEBREW UNIVERSITY MEDICAL CENTER   (Israel)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ALLOANTIBODY;

ARTICLE; BLOOD; BLOOD GROUP INCOMPATIBILITY; BLOOD GROUP LUTHERAN SYSTEM; BLOOD GROUP TYPING; CASE REPORT; ERYTHROCYTE TRANSFUSION; ETHNOLOGY; FEMALE; HUMAN; IMMUNOLOGY; IRAN; ISRAEL; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; PHENOTYPE;

BLOOD GROUP INCOMPATIBILITY; BLOOD GROUPING AND CROSSMATCHING; ERYTHROCYTE TRANSFUSION; FEMALE; HUMANS; IRAN; ISOANTIBODIES; ISRAEL; LUTHERAN BLOOD-GROUP SYSTEM; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; PHENOTYPE;

EID: 0036480516     PISSN: 00411132     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1046/j.1537-2995.2002.00019.x     Document Type: Article

References (20)

1. 1 Parson SF, Lee G, Spring FA, et al. Lutheran blood group glycoprotein and its newly characterized mouse homologue specifically bind α 5 chain‐containing human laminin with high affinity. Blood 2001 ; 97: 312 ‐ 20.
2. 2 Wrobel DM, Moore BPL, Cornwall S, et al. A second example of Lu(6) in the Lutheran system. Vox Sang 1972 ; 23: 205 ‐ 7.
3. 3 Marsh WL. Anti‐Lu5, anti‐Lu6 and anti‐Lu7. Three antibodies defining high frequency antigens related to the Lutheran blood group system. Transfusion 1972 ; 12: 27 ‐ 34.
4. 4 Dybkjaer K, Lylloff K, Tippett P. Weak Lu9 antigen in one Lu:‐6 member of a family. Vox Sang 1974 ; 26: 94 ‐ 6.
5. 5 Gibson M, Devenish M, Daniels GL, Contreras M. A transfusion problem in a thalassaemic infant with anti‐Lu6 (abstract). In: Proceedings of the British Blood Transfusion Society. Cambridge: British Blood Transfusion Society, 1983.
6. 6 Issitt PD, Valinsky JE, Marsh WL, et al. In vivo red cell destruction by anti‐Lu6. Transfusion 1990 ; 30: 258 ‐ 60.
7. 7 Crawford MN. The Lutheran blood group system: serology and genetics. In: Pierce SR, Macpherson CR, eds. Blood group systems: Duffy, Kidd and Lutheran, Vol. 5. Arlington, VA: American Association of Blood Banks, 1988: 93 ‐ 117.
8. 8 Vengelen‐Tyler V, ed. Technical Manual, 13th ed. Bethesda: American Association of Blood Banks, 1999: 389 ‐ 418.
9. 9 Beutler E, West C. Measurement of the viability of stored red cells by the single‐isotope technique using 51 Cr. Analysis of validity. Transfusion 1984 ; 24: 100 ‐ 4.
10. 10 Garratty G. Predicting the clinical significance of alloantibodies and determining the survival of transfused red blood cells. In: Judd WJ, Barnes A, eds. Clinical and serological aspects of transfusion reactions. Arlington, VA: American Association of Blood Banks, 1982: 91 ‐ 119.
11. 11 Nance SJ, Arndt P, Garratty G. Predicting the clinical significance of red cell alloantibodies using a monocyte monolayer assay. Transfusion 1987 ; 27: 449 ‐ 52.
12. 12 Schanfield MS, Stevens JO, Bauman D. The detection of clinically significant erythrocyte alloantibodies using a human mononuclear phagocyte assay. Transfusion 1981 ; 21: 571 ‐ 6.
13. 13 Hadley A, Wilkes A, Poole J, et al. A chemiluminescence test for predicting the outcome of transfusing incompatible blood. Transfus Med 1999 ; 9: 337 ‐ 42.
14. 14 Crawford MN, Greenwalt TJ, Sasaki T, et al. The phenotype Lu(a‐b‐) together with unconventional Kidd groups in one family. Transfusion 1961 ; 1: 228 ‐ 32.
15. 15 Greenwalt TJ, Sasaki T. The Lutheran blood groups: a second example of anti‐Lu b and three further examples of anti‐Lu a. Blood 1957 ; 12: 998 ‐ 1003.
16. 16 Molthan L, Crawford MN. Three examples of anti‐Lu b and related data. Transfusion 1966 ; 6: 584 ‐ 9.
17. 17 Kissmeyer‐Nielsen F. A further example of anti‐Lu b as a cause of mild haemolytic disease of the newborn. Vox Sang 1960 ; 5: 532 ‐ 7.
18. 18 Francis BJ, Hatcher DE. Hemolytic disease of the newborn apparently caused by anti‐Lu a. Transfusion 1961 ; 1: 248 ‐ 50.
19. 19 Scheffer H, Tamaki HI. Anti‐Lu a and mild hemolytic disease of the newborn. Transfusion 1966 ; 6: 497 ‐ 8.
20. 20 Inderblitzen PE, Windle B. An example of HDN probably due to anti‐Lu a. Transfusion 1982 ; 22: 542.