Collaborative relevance judgment: A group consensus method for evaluating user search performance

Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology

Volumn 53, Issue 3, 2002, Pages 220-231

  Zhang, Xiangmin ^a  

^a WAYNE STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

DATABASE SYSTEMS; INFORMATION SCIENCE; ONLINE SEARCHING; USER INTERFACES;

GROUP CONSENSUS METHOD;

INFORMATION RETRIEVAL;

EID: 0036469410     PISSN: 15322882     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/asi.10036     Document Type: Article

References (36)

1. User-defined relevance criteria: An exploratory study
2. Users' criteria for relevance evaluation: A cross-situational comparison
3. STAIRS redux: Thoughts on the STAIRS evaluation, ten years after
4. All users of IR systems are not created equal: An exploration into individual differences
5. Individual differences in human-computer interaction
6. Psychological relevance and information science
7. Relevance and retrieval evaluation: Perspectives from medicine
8. Recommending and evaluating choices in a virtual community of use
9. Collaborative IR: Toward a social informatics view of IR interaction
10. Speculations on the measurement and use of user characteristics in IR experimentation
11. Relevance: The whole history
12. User models and filtering agents for improved Internet IR
13. Markov models of search state patterns in a hypertext information retrieval system
14. Recommender systems
15. Interaction on the Web: Scholars' judgment of information quality and cognitive authority
16. Sharing information found for others on the World Wide Web: A preliminary examination
17. Relevance: A review of and a framework for the thinking on the notion in information science
18. Relevance and information behavior
19. Social information filtering: Algorithms for automating "word of mouth"
20. The relevance of recall and precision in user evaluation
21. Designing interfaces to support collaboration in information retrieval
22. Browsing is a collaborative process
23. A total relevance and document interaction effects model for the evaluation of IR processes
24. Variations in relevance judgments and the measurement of retrieval effectiveness
25. Overview of the eighth text retrieval conference (TREC-8)
26. Measuring retrieval effectiveness based on user preference of documents
27. Effects of search experience and subject knowledge on the search tactics of novice and experienced searchers