Habitat preferences of swan mussel Anodonta cygnea (Linnaeus 1758) (Bivalvia, Unionidae) in relation to structure and successional stage of floodplain waterbodies

Ekologia Bratislava

Volumn 21, Issue 4, 2002, Pages 345-355

  Zaja̧c, Katarzyna ^a  

^a INSTITUTE OF NATURE CONSERVATION   (Poland)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

DISSOLVED OXYGEN; FLOODPLAIN; HABITAT SELECTION; HABITAT STRUCTURE; MOLLUSC;

POLAND;

ANODONTA CYGNEA; BIVALVIA; CERATOPHYLLUM; HYDROCHAERIS;

EID: 0036453431     PISSN: 1335342X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (21)

1. Aldridge, D.C., 2000: The impact of dredging and weed cutting on population of freshwater mussel (Bivalvia: Unionidae). Biological Conservation, 95, 3 p. 247-257.
2. Allen, D.J., 1995: Stream Ecology. Structure and Function of Running Waters. Chapman & Hall, New York, USA, 388 pp.
3. Cummings, K.S., Mayer, C.A., 1992: Field guide to freshwater mussels of the Midwest. Illinois Natural History Survey Manual 5.
4. Dyduch-Falniowska, A., 1992: Mussels Bivalvia (in Polish). In Głowaciński, Z. (ed.): Red List of Threatened Animals in Poland. ZOPiZN PAN, Kraków p. 25-29.
5. Hartman, W.N., 1972: Benthic substrates: Their effects on fresh-water Mollusca. Ecology, 53, p. 271-277.
6. Hermanowicz, W., Dożańska, W., Dojlido, I., Koziorowski, B., 1976: Physicochemical Studies of the Water and Sewage (in Polish). Arkady, Warszawa.
7. Hilton-Taylor, C. (Compiler), 2000: 2000 IUCN Red List of Threatened Species. IUCN, Gland, Switzerland and Cambridge, UK. CD-ROM + XVIII + 61 pp.
8. Holland-Bartels, L.E., 1990: Physical factors and their influence on the mussel fauna of a main channel border habitat of the upper Mississippi River. Journal of the North American Benthological Society 9, 4, p. 327-335.
9. th International Malacological Congress, Edinburgh, Scotland 1986, p. 1-7.
10. Korzeniak, J., Zaja̧c, K., Zaja̧c, T., 1995: Delta of the Middle Nida River - Present status and conservation perspective (in Polish). Chrońmy Przyrodç Ojczystaa̧ 51, 5, p. 27-46.
11. Kostrowicki, A.S., Solon, J. (eds), 1994: Geobotanical and landscape case-study in Pińezów areas (in Polish). Geographical Records, 1-2, p. 1-230.
12. Naiman, R.J., Bilby, R.E. (eds), 1998: River Ecology and Management. Springer-Verlag, New York, USA.
13. Negus, C.L., 1966: A quantitative study of growth and reproduction of unionid mussels in the River Thames at Reading. Jouirnal of Animal Ecology, 35, p. 513-532.
14. Neves, R.J., 1999: Conservation and commerce: Management of freshwater mussel (Bivalvia: Unionoidae) resources in the United States. Malacologia, 41, 2, p. 461-474.
15. Piechocki, A., Dyduch-Falniowska, A., 1993: Molluscs (Mollusca). Bivalves (Bivalvia). Polskie Towarzystwo Hydrobiologiezne & Wyd. Nauk. PWN, Warszawa (in Polish), 205 pp.
16. Ravera, O., Sprocati, A.R., 1997: Population dynamics, production, assimilation and respiration of two fresh water mussels: Unio mancus, Zhadin and Anodonta cygnea Lam. Memorie dell'Istituto Italiano di Idrobiolgia, 56, p. 113-130.
17. Rhodes, H.A., Hubert, W.A., 1991: Submerged undercut banks as macroinvertebrate habitat in a subalpine meadow stream. Hydrobiologia, 213, p. 149-153.
18. Stem, E., 1983: Depth distribution and density of freshwater mussels (Unionidae) collected with SCUBA from the lower Wisconsin and St. Croix Rivers. Nautilus, 97, p. 36-41.
19. Strayer, D., 1983: The effects of surface geology and stream size on freshwater mussel (Bivalvia, Unionidae) distribution in southeastern Michigan, U.S.A. Freshwater Biology, 13, p. 253-264.
20. Tudorancea, C., Florescu, M., 1968: Consideration concerning the production and energetic of Unio tumidus Philipsson population from the Carpina Marsh. Travaux du Museum d'Histoire Naturelle "Grigore Antipa", 8, p. 395-409.
21. Ward, J.V., 1998: Riverine landscapes: Biodiversity patterns, disturbance regimes, and aquatic conservation. Biological Conservation, 83, 3, p. 269-278.