In situ longitudinal tensile tests of pine wood in an environmental scanning electron microscope

Holzforschung

Volumn 56, Issue 6, 2002, Pages 669-675

  Sippola, Merja ^a   Frühmann, Klaus ^b  

^a AALTO UNIVERSITY   (Finland)

^b UNIVERSITY OF NATURAL RESOURCES AND LIFE SCIENCES   (Austria)

Author keywords

Bimaterial interface; Crack propagation; Fracture phenomena; In situ tensile tests; Microstructural damage; Pine wood

Indexed keywords

ACOUSTIC EMISSION TESTING; IN SITU PROCESSING; OPTICAL MICROSCOPY; SCANNING ELECTRON MICROSCOPY; TENSILE TESTING;

FRACTURED SURFACES;

WOOD;

PINUS; SCANNING ELECTRON MICROSCOPY; TENSILE TESTS;

PINUS SYLVESTRIS;

EID: 0036453410     PISSN: 00183830     EISSN: None     Source Type: Trade Journal    
DOI: 10.1515/HF.2002.101     Document Type: Article

References (17)

1. Boatright, S.W.J. and G.G. Garrett. 1983. The effect of microstructure and stress state on the fracture behaviour of wood. J. Mat. Sci. 18, 2181-2199.
2. Bodner, J., G. Grüll and M. Schlag. 1996. In situ fracturing of wood in the scanning electron microscope. Holzforschung 50, 487-490.
3. Bodner, J.,G. Grüll and M. Schlag. 1997. Fracture initiation and progress in wood specimens stressed in tension. Holzforschung 51, 487-490.
4. Coté, W.A. and R.B. Hanna. 1983. Ultrastructural characteristics of wood fracture surfaces. Wood Fibre Sci. 15(2), 135-163.
5. Dill-Langer, G. and S. Aicher. 2000. Monitoring of microfracture by microscopy and acoustic emission. In: Wood and Wood Fiber Composites. Ed. S. Aicher. Conference Proceeding, Stuttgart. pp. 93-104.
6. Futó, L. 1969. Qualitative und quantitative Ermittlung der Mikrozugeigenschaften von Holz. Holz Roh-Werkst. 27(5), 192-201.
7. He, M.Y. and J.W. Hutchinson. 1989. Crack deflection at an interface between dissimilar elastic materials. Int. J. Soilds Structures 25(9), 1053-1067.
8. Jayne, B. 1960. Some mechanical properties of wood fibers in tenion. For. Prod. J. 10, 316-322.
9. Jernkvist, L.O. 2000. On the Fracture Behaviour of Softwood. Doctoral thesis, Lund University of Technology.
10. Kifetew, G.,F. Thuvander, L. Berglund and H. Lindberg. 1998. The effect of drying on wood fracture surfaces from specimens loaded in wet condition. Wood Sci. and Techn. 32, 83-94.
11. Kolednik, O. 2000. The yield stress gradient effect in inhomogeneous materials. Int. J. Solids Structures. 37, 781-808.
12. Korán, Z. 1967. Electron microscopy of radial tracheid surfaces of black spruce separated by tensile failure at various temperatures. Tappi J. 50(2), 60-67.
13. Mott, L., S.M. Shaler, L.H. Groom and B.-H. Liang. 1995. The tensile testing of individual wood fibres using environmental scanning microscopy and video image analysis. Tappi J. 78(5), 143-148.
14. Mott, L., S.M. Shaler, and L.H. Groom. 1996. A technique to measure strain distributions in single wood pulp fibres. Wood Fibre Sci. 28(4), 429-437.
15. Sippola, M. and S. Koponen. 1999. Fracture behaviour of clear softwood - Tests and FEM-models. In: Workshop Damage in Wood. Ed. P. Morlier. Conference Proceeding, Bordeaux. pp. 87-101.
16. Wäppling, D.,J. Gunnars and P. Stahle. 1998. Crack growth across a strength mismatched bimaterial interface. Int. J. Fracture 89, 223-243.
17. Zimmermann, T.,J. Sell and D. Eckstein. 1994. Rasterelektro-nenmikroskopische Untersuchungen an Zugbruchflächen von Fichtenholz. Holz Roh-Werkst. 52, 223-229.