Divergence in alternative Hicksian welfare measures: The case of revealed preference for public amenities

Journal of Applied Econometrics

Volumn 17, Issue 6, 2002, Pages 641-666

  Chattopadhyay, Sudip ^a  

^a SAN FRANCISCO STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 0036453194     PISSN: 08837252     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/jae.635     Document Type: Article

References (31)

1. Atkinson SE, Crocker TD. 1987. A Baysean approach to assessing the robustness of hedonic property value studies. Journal of Applied Econometrics 2: 27-45.
2. Bartik TJ. 1987. The estimation of demand parameters in hedonic price models. Journal of Political Economy 95: 81-88.
3. Bartik TJ. 1988. Measuring the benefits of amenity improvements in hedonic price models. Land Economics 64: 172-183.
4. Brown JN, Rosen HS. 1982. On the estimation of structural hedonic price models. Econometrica 50: 765-768.
5. Cassel E, Mendelsohn R. 1985. The choice of functional forms for hedonic price equations: comments. Journal of Urban Economics 18: 135-142.
6. Chattopadhyay S. 1998. An empirical investigation into the performance of Ellickson's random bidding model with an application to air quality valuation. Journal of Urban Economics 43: 292-314.
7. Chattopadhyay S. 1999. Estimating the demand for air quality: new evidence based on the Chicago housing market. Land Economics 75: 22-38.
8. Chattopadhyay S. 2000. The effectiveness of McFadden's nested logit model in valuing amenity improvement. Regional Science and Urban Economics 30: 23-43.
9. Coursey DL, Hovis JJ, Schulze WD. 1987. The disparity between willingness to accept and willingness to pay measures of value. Quarterly Journal of Economics 102: 679-690.
10. Cropper ML, Deck LB, McConnell KE. 1988. On the choice of functional forms for hedonic price function. Review of Economics and Statistics 70: 668-675.
11. Cummings RG, Brookshire DS, Schulze WD. 1986. Valuing Public Goods: An Assessment of Contingent Valuation Method. Rowman and Allanheld: NJ.
12. Ellickson B. 1981. An alternative test of the hedonic theory of housing markets. Journal of Urban Economics 9: 56-79.
13. Epple D. 1987. Hedonic prices and implicit markets: estimating demand and supply functions for differentiated products. Journal of Political Economy 87: 59-80.
14. Fisher AM, Gary H, Schulze WD. 1988. Measuring the willingness to pay and willingness to accept: evidence, explanation, and potential reconciliation. In Amenity Resource Valuation: Integrating Economics with Other Disciplines, Peterson GL, Driver BL, Gregory R (eds). Venture: State College, PA.
15. Freeman AM. 1994. The Measurement of Environmental and Resource Values: Theory and Methods, Resources for the Future.
16. Graves P, Murdoch JC, Thayer MA, Waldman D. 1988. The robustness of hedonic price estimation: urban air quality. Land Economics 64: 220-233.
17. Halvorsen R, Pollakowsky HO. 1981. Choice of functional form for hedonic price equations. Journal of Urban Economics 10: 37-49.
18. Hanemann MW. 1991. Willingness to pay and willingness to accept: how much can they differ? American Economic Review 81: 635-647.
19. Herriges JA, Kling CL. 1999. Nonlinear income effects in random utility models. The Review of Economics and Statistics 81: 62-72.
20. Johansson PO. 1987. The Economic Theory of Measurement of Environmental Benefits, Cambridge University Press: Cambridge.
21. Knetsch JL, Sinden JA. 1984. Willingness to pay and compensation demanded: experimental disparity in measures of value. Quarterly Journal of Economics 99: 507-521.
22. Lankford RH. 1988. Measuring welfare changes in settings with imposed quantities. Journal of Environmental Economics and Management 15: 45-63.
23. McFadden D. 1978. Modeling the choice of residential location. In Spatial Interaction Theory and Planning Models, Karlqvist et al. (eds). North-Holland: Amsterdam.
24. Mendelsohn R. 1985. Identifying structural equations with single market data. Review of Economics and Statistics 67: 525-529.
25. Michaels RG, Smith VK. 1990. Market segmentation and valuing amenities with hedonic models: the case of hazardous waste sites. Journal of Urban Economics 28: 223-242.
26. Oshfeldt RL, Smith BA. 1985. Estimating the demand for heterogeneous goods. Review of Economics and Statistics 67: 165-171.
27. Palmquist RB. 1991. Hedonic methods. In Measuring the Demand for Environmental Quality, Braden JB, Kolstad CD (eds). Elsevier: Amsterdam.
28. Randall A, Stoll JR. 1980. Consumer surplus in commodity space. American Economic Review 70: 449-457.
29. Rosen S. 1974. Hedonic prices and implicit markets: product differentiation in perfect competition. Journal of Political Economy 82: 34-55.
30. Shogren JF, Shin SY, Hayes DJ, Kliebenstein JB. 1994. Resolving differences in willingness to pay and willingness to accept. American Economic Review 84, 255-270.
31. Willig R. 1976. Consumer surplus without apology. American Economic Review 66, 589-597.