The forcing relation for horseshoe braid types

Experimental Mathematics

Volumn 11, Issue 2, 2002, Pages 271-288

  De Carvalho, André ^a   Hall, Toby ^b  

^a STONY BROOK UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF LIVERPOOL   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

Braid forcing; Horseshoe periodic orbits

Indexed keywords

EID: 0036452903     PISSN: 10586458     EISSN: 1944950X     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/10586458.2002.10504691     Document Type: Article

References (24)

1. R. Adler, A. Konheim, and M. McAndrew. “Topological entropy.” Trans. Amer. Math. Soc. 114 (1965), 309-319.
2. D. Benardete, M. Gutierrez, and Z. Nitecki. “A combinatorial approach to reducibility of mapping classes.” In Mapping class groups and moduli spaces of Riemann surfaces (Gottingen, 1991 /Seattle, WA, 1991), pp. 1-31, Amer. Math. Soc., Providence, RI, 1993.
3. D. Benardete, M. Gutierrez, and Z. Nitecki. “Braids and the Nielsen-Thurston classification.” J. Knot Theory Ramifications 4: 4 (1995), 549-618.
4. M. Bestvina and M. Handel. “Train-tracks for surface homeomorphisms.” Topology 34: 1 (1995), 109-140.
5. P. Boyland. emphBraid types and a topological method of proving positive entropy, Preprint, Boston University (the results of this preprint are included in the published paper [Boyland 94]), 1984.
6. P. Boyland, “Rotation sets and monotone periodic orbits for annulus homeomorphisms.” Comment. Math. Helv. 2 (1992), 203-213.
7. P. Boyland. “Topological methods in surface dynamics.” Topology Appl. 58: 3 (1994), 223-298.
8. A. de Carvalho. “Pruning fronts and the formation of horseshoes.” Ergodic Theory Dynam. Systems 19: 4 (1999), 851-894.
9. A. de Carvalho and T. Hall. “Conjugacies between horseshoe braids.” Preprint.
10. A. de Carvalho and T. Hall, “Star shaped train tracks.” Preprint.
11. A. de Carvalho and T. Hall, “Pruning theory and Thurston’s classification of surface homeomorphisms.” J. European Math. Soc. 3: 4 (2001), 287-333.
12. R. Devaney. An introduction to chaotic dynamical systems, Second ed., Addison-Wesley Publishing Company Advanced Book Program, Redwood City, CA, 1989.
13. A. Fathi, F. Laudenbach, and V. Poenaru. “Travaux de Thurston sur les surfaces.” In Sociiti Mathematique de Prance, Paris, 1979, Seminaire Orsay.
14. J. Franks and M. Misiurewicz. “Cycles for disk homeomorphisms and thick trees.” in Nielsen theory and dynamical systems (South Hadley, MA, 1992), pp. 69-139, Amer. Math. Soc., Providence, RI, 1993.
15. T. Hall. Software available from http://www.liv.ac.uk/~tobyhall/hs/.
16. T. Hall. “Unremovable periodic orbits of homeomorphisms.” Math. Proc. Cambridge Philos. Soc. 110: 3 (1991), 523-531.
17. T. Hall. “The creation of horseshoes.” Nonlinearity 7: 3 (1994), 861-924.
18. T. Hall. New invariants and entropy bounds for partially formed horseshoes, Centre de Recerca Matematica preprint No. 269, November 1994.
19. H. Hulme. Finite and infinite braids: a dynamical systems approach, Ph.D. thesis, University of Liverpool, 2000.
20. P. Holmes and R. Williams. “Knotted periodic orbits in suspensions of Smale’s horseshoe: torus knots and bifurcation sequences.” Arch. Rational Mech. Anal. 90: 2 (1985), 115-194.
21. A. Katok. “Lyapunov exponents, entropy and periodic orbits for diffeomorphisms.” Inst. Hautes Etudes Set. Publ. Math. 51 (1980), 137-173.
22. J. Los. “Pseudo-Anosov maps and invariant train tracks in the disc: a finite algorithm.” Proc. London Math. Soc. (S) 66: 2 (1993), 400-430.
23. S. Smale. “Differentiable dynamical systems.” Bull. Amer. Math. Soc. 73 (1967), 747-817.
24. W. Thurston. “On the geometry and dynamics of diffeomorphisms of surfaces.” Bull. Amer. Math. Soc. (N.S.) 19: 2 (1988), 417-431.