A discussion of the paper "effect of drying on cement-based materials pore structure as identified by mercury porosimetry - A comparative study between oven-, vacuum-, and freeze-drying" by C. Gallé

Cement and Concrete Research

Volumn 33, Issue 1, 2003, Pages 169-170

  Diamond, Sidney ^a  

^a PURDUE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 0036445535     PISSN: 00088846     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/S0008-8846(02)00940-7     Document Type: Note

References (6)

1. Diamond S. Mercury porosimetry: an inappropriate method for the measurement of pore size distributions in cement based materials. Cem. Concr. Res. (30):2000;1517-1525.
2. Winslow D.N., Diamond S. A mercury porosimetry study of the evolution of porosity in hardened cement pastes. J. Mater. (ASTM). 5:1970;564.
3. Diamond S., Leeman M.E. Pore size distributions in hardened cement pastes by image analysis. Diamond S., Mindess S., Glasser F.P., Roberts L.W., Skalny J.P., Wakeley L.D. Microstructure of Cement Based Systems/Bonding and Interfaces in Cementitious Materials. Materials Research Society Symposia Proceedings. vol. 370:1995;217-226. Pittsburgh, PA, USA.
4. Neville A. Properties of Concrete. 4th ed. 1996;32 Wiley, New York.
5. Wild S. Discussion of the paper "Mercury porosimetry - an inappropriate method for the measurement of pore size distributions in cement-based materials" Cem. Concr. Res. 31:2001;1653-1654.
6. Diamond S. Reply to the discussion by S. Wild of the paper "Mercury porosimetry - an inappropriate method for the measurement of pore size distributions in cement-based materials" Cem. Concr. Res. 31:2001;1655-1656.