Performance differences according to test mode and computer familiarity on a practice graduate record exam

Educational and Psychological Measurement

Volumn 62, Issue 6, 2002, Pages 1053-1067

  Goldberg, Amie L ^a   Pedulla, Joseph J ^a  

^a NONE

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 0036444269     PISSN: 00131644     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1177/0013164402238092     Document Type: Article

References (14)

1. Cohen, J. (1977). Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
2. Donlon, T. F. (1979, April). Time for review as an aspect of test speededness. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the New England Educational Research Organization, Provincetown, MA. (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED 181 034)
3. Glass, G. V., & Hopkins, K. D. (1996). Statistical methods in education and psychology (3rd ed). Boston: Allyn & Bacon.
4. Graduate Record Examinations Board. (1992). Practicing to take the GRE General Test (9th ed.). Princeton, NJ: Educational Testing Service.
5. Hedges, L., & Olkin, I. (1985). Statistical methods for meta-analysis. New York: Academic Press.
6. Lee, J. A., & Hopkins, L. (1985, March). The effects of training on computerized aptitude test performance and anxiety. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the Eastern Psychological Association, Boston. (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED 263 889)
7. Mazzeo, J., & Harvey, A. L. (1988). The equivalence of scores from automated and conventional educational and psychological tests: A review of the literature (ETS Rep. No. RR-88-21). Princeton, NJ: Educational Testing Service. (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED 304 462)
8. Mead, A. D., & Drasgow, F. (1993). Equivalence of computerized and paper-and-pencil cognitive ability tests: A meta-analysis. Psychological Bulletin, 114, 449-458.
9. Schaeffer, G. A., Reese, C. M., Steffen, M., McKinley, R. L., & Mills, C. N. (1993). Field test of a computer-based GRE General Test (ETS Report No. RR-93-07). Princeton, NJ: Educational Testing Service. (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED 385 588)
10. Schaeffer, O. A., Steffen, M., Golub-Smith, M. L., Mills, C. N., & Durso, R. (1995). The introduction and comparability of the computer adaptive GRE General Test (ETS Report No. RR-95-20). Princeton, NJ: Educational Testing Service. (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED 393 936)
11. Swineford, F. (1973, February). An assessment of the Kuder-Richardson Formula (20) reliability estimate for moderately speeded tests. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the National Council of Measurement in Education, New Orleans, LA. (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED 074 095)
12. Terranova, C. (1972). Relationship between test score and test time. Journal of Experimental Education, 40(3), 81-83.
13. Vispoel, W. P., Wang, T., de la Torre, R., Bleiler, T., & Dings, J. (1992, April). How review options and administration modes influence scores on computerized vocabulary tests. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association, San Francisco. (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED 346 161)
14. Wise, S. L., & Plake, B. S. (1989). Research on the effects of administering tests via computers. Educational Measurement: Issues and Practice, 5(3), 5-10.