Effects of early auditory deprivation and stimulation on auditory brainstem responses in the rat

Acta Oto-Laryngologica

Volumn 122, Issue 7, 2002, Pages 703-708

  Dammeijer, P F M ^a   Schlundt Bodien, Q C M ^a   Chenault, M N ^a   Manni, J J ^a   Anteunis, L J C ^a  

^a MAASTRICHT UNIVERSITY MEDICAL CENTER   (Netherlands)

Author keywords

Auditory brainstem responses; Auditory deprivation; Auditory stimulation; Rat

Indexed keywords

ANIMAL EXPERIMENT; ARTICLE; AUDITORY RESPONSE; AUDITORY STIMULATION; AUDITORY SYSTEM; AUDITORY THRESHOLD; BRAIN STEM RESPONSE; CONDUCTION DEAFNESS; CONTROLLED STUDY; MEASUREMENT; NONHUMAN; PERINATAL PERIOD; PRIORITY JOURNAL; RAT; SENSORY DEPRIVATION; SOUND PRESSURE;

ACOUSTIC STIMULATION; AGE FACTORS; ANIMALS; ANIMALS, NEWBORN; AUDITORY THRESHOLD; EVOKED POTENTIALS, AUDITORY, BRAIN STEM; HEARING LOSS, CONDUCTIVE; MALE; RATS; SENSORY DEPRIVATION;

EID: 0036440916     PISSN: 00016489     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/003655402/000028038     Document Type: Article

References (25)

1. Shaw NA. The auditory evoked potential in the rat - A review. Prog Neurobiol 1988; 31: 19-45.
2. Friauf E, Lohmann C. Development of auditory brainstem circuitry. Activity-dependent and activity-independent processes. Cell Tissue Res 1999; 297: 187-95.
3. Webster DB, Webster M. Neonatal sound deprivation affects brain stem auditory nuclei. Arch Otolaryngol 1977; 103: 392-8.
4. Blatchley BJ, Williams JE, Coleman JR. Age-dependent effects of acoustic deprivation on spherical cells of the rat anteroventral cochlear nucleus. Exp Neurol 1983; 80: 81-93.
5. Moore DR. Postnatal development of the mammalian central auditory system and the neural consequences of auditory deprivation. Acta Otolaryngol Suppl (Stockh) 1985; 421: 19-30.
6. Walger M, Laska M, Schneider I, Diekmann H, von Wedel H. Maturation of auditory evoked potentials in young guinea pigs with binaural conductive hearing loss. Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol 1993; 250: 362-5.
7. Keilmann A. Einfluss einer Schalldeprivation auf die Hörbahnreifung bei der Ratte. Laryngorhinootologie 1993; 72: 15-8.
8. Eggermont JJ. Defining and determining sensitive periods. Acta Otolaryngol Suppl (Stockh) 1986; 429: 5-9.
9. Saunders JC, Doan DE, Cohen YE. The contribution of middle-ear sound conduction to auditory development. Comp Biochem Physiol A Physiol 1993; 106: 7-13.
10. Geal-Dor M, Freeman S, Li G, Sohmer H. Development of hearing in neonatal rats: Air and bone conducted ABR thresholds. Hear Res 1993; 69: 236-42.
11. McFadden SL, Walsh EJ, McGee J. Onset and development of auditory brainstem responses in the Mongolian gerbil (Meriones unguiculatus). Hear Res 1996; 100: 68-79.
12. Walsh EJ, McGee J, Javel E. Development of auditory-evoked potentials in the cat. I. Onset of response and development of sensitivity. J Acoust Soc Am 1986; 79: 712-24.
13. Woolf NK, Ryan AF. Contributions of the middle ear to the development of function in the cochlea. Hear Res 1988; 35: 131-42.
14. Doan DE, Igic PG, Saunders JC. Middle-ear development VII: Umbo velocity in the neonatal rat. J Acoust Soc Am 1996; 99: 1566-72.
15. Walsh RN. Effects of environmental complexity and deprivation on brain anatomy and histology: A review. Int J Neurosci 1981; 12: 33-51.
16. Dmitrieva LP, Gottlieb G. Influence of auditory experience on the development of brain stem auditory evoked potentials in mallard duck embryos and hatchlings. Behav Neural Biol 1994; 61: 19-28.
17. Anteunis LJC, Engel JAM. Maastricht Otitis Media with Effusion Study, a Prospective Longitudinal Study in Infants from 0 to 2 Years [Thesis]. Limburg, The Netherlands: University of Limburg, 2000: 179-93.
18. Folsom RC, Webster BA, Thompson G. Auditory brainstem responses in children with early recurrent middle-ear disease. Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol 1983; 92: 249-53.
19. Dammeijer PF, van Mameren H, van Dijk P, et al. Stapedius muscle fibre composition in the rat. Hear Res 2000; 141: 169-79.
20. Van den Berge H, Kingma H, Kluge C, Marres EHMA. Electrophysiological aspects of the middle ear muscle reflex in the rat: Latency, rise time and effect on sound transmission. Hear Res 1990; 48: 209-19.
21. Stockard JE, Stockard JJ, Westmoreland BF, Corfits JL. Brainstem auditory-evoked potentials. Normal variation as a function of stimulus and subject characteristics. Arch Neurol 1979; 36: 823-31.
22. Sohmer H, Friedman I. Prolonged conductive hearing loss in rat pups causes shorter brainstem transmission time. Hear Res 1992; 61: 189-96.
23. Sohmer H, Freeman S, Friedman I, Lidan D. Auditory brainstem response (ABR) latency shifts in animal models of various types of conductive and sensori-neural hearing loss. Acta Otolaryngol (Stockh) 1991; 111: 206-11.
24. Doyle WJ, Webster DB. Neonatal conductive hearing loss does not compromise brainstem auditory function and structure in rhesus monkeys. Hear Res 1991; 54: 145-51.
25. Goss-Sampson MA, Kriss A. Effects of pentobarbital and ketamine-xylazine anaesthesia on somatosensory, brainstem auditory and peripheral sensory-motor responses in the rat. Lab Anim 1991; 25: 360-6.