Combining software quality predictive models: An evolutionary approach

Conference on Software Maintenance

Volumn , Issue , 2002, Pages 385-392

  Bouktif, Salah ^a   Kégl, Balázs ^a   Sahraoui, Houari ^a  

^a UNIVERSITÉ DE MONTRÉAL   (Canada)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

GENETIC ALGORITHMS; KNOWLEDGE BASED SYSTEMS; OBJECT ORIENTED PROGRAMMING; SOFTWARE ENGINEERING;

RULE BASED CLASSIFIERS;

COMPUTER SOFTWARE SELECTION AND EVALUATION;

EID: 0036437917     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: None     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (17)

1. L. Briand, P. Devanbu, and W. Melo. An investigation into coupling measures for C++. In Proceedings of the 19th International Conference on Software Engineering, 1997.
2. L. Briand and J. Wüst. Empirical studies of quality models in object-oriented systems. In M. Zelkowitz, editor, Advances in Computers. Academic Press, 2002.
3. L. Briand, J. Wrist, J.W. Daly, and V. Porter. Exploring the relationships between design measures and software quality in object-oriented systems. Journal of Systems and Software, 51:245-273, 2000.
4. S.R. Chidamber and C.F. Kemerer. A metrics suite for object oriented design. IEEE Transactions of Software Engineering, 20(6):476-493, 1994.
5. E. Falkenauer. Genetic Algorithms and Grouping Problems. John Wiley & Sons, 1998.
6. N.E. Fenton and N.M. Software metrics: roadmap. In A. Finkelstein, editor, The Future of Software Engineering 22nd International Conference on Software Engineering, pages 357-370. ACM Press, 2000.
7. Y. Freund and R. Schapire. A decision-theoretic generalization of on-line learning and an application to boosting. Journal of Computer and System Sciences, 55(1):119-139, 1997.
8. A. Gray and S. MacDonell. A comparison of techniques for developing predictive models of software metrics. Information and Software Technology, 39:425-437, 1997.
9. J.H. Holland. Adaptation in Natural Artificial Systems. University of Michigan Press, 1975.
10. R.A. Jacobs, M.I. Jordan, S.J. Nowlan, and G.E. Hinton. Adaptive mixtures of local experts. Neural Computation, 3(1):79-87, 1991.
11. R. Meir, R. El-Yaniv, and S. Ben-David. Localized boosting. In Proceedings of the 13th Annual Conference on Computational Learning Theory, pages 190-199, 2000.
12. P. Moerland and E. Mayoraz. DynaBoost: Combining boosted hypotheses in a dynamic way. IDIAP-RR 9, IDIAP, Switzerland, 1999.
13. J. Quinlan. C4.5: Programs for Machine Learning. Morgan Kaufmann, 1993.
14. D.E. Rumelhart, G.E. Hinton, and R.J. Williams. Learning representations by back-propagating errors. Nature, 323:533-536, 1986.
15. R.E. Schapire, Y. Freund, P. Bartlett, and W.S. Lee. Boosting the margin: a new explanation for the effectiveness of voting methods. Annals of Statistics, 26(5): 1651-1686, 1998.
16. W.J. Youden. How to evaluate accuracy. Materials Research and Standards, ASTM, 1961.
17. H. Zuse. A Framework of Software Measurement. Walter de Gruyter, 1998.