Phylogeography of chamois (Rupicapra spp.) inferred from microsatellites

Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution

Volumn 25, Issue 3, 2002, Pages 524-534

  Pérez, Trinidad ^a   Albornoz, Jesús ^a   Domínguez, Ana ^a  

^a DEPARTAMENTO DE BIOQUÍMICA Y BIOLOGÍA MOLECULAR   (Spain)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

MICROSATELLITE DNA;

ALLELE; ANIMAL; ARTICLE; CATTLE; CHROMOSOME MAP; CLASSIFICATION; GENETIC VARIABILITY; GENETICS; GEOGRAPHY; PHYLOGENY;

ALLELES; ANIMALS; CATTLE; CHROMOSOME MAPPING; GEOGRAPHY; MICROSATELLITE REPEATS; PHYLOGENY; VARIATION (GENETICS);

RUPICAPRA; RUPICAPRA PYRENAICA; RUPICAPRA RUPICAPRA;

EID: 0036435257     PISSN: 10557903     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/S1055-7903(02)00296-8     Document Type: Article

References (47)

1. Avise, J.C., Arnold, R.M., Ball Jr., R.M., Berminghan, E., Lamb, T., Neigel, J.E., Reeb, C.A., Saunders, N.C., 1987. Intraspecific phylogeography: The mitochondrial DNA bridge between population genetics and systematics. Annu. Rev. Ecol. Syst. 18, 489-522.
2. Avise, J.C., Walker, D., Johns, G.C., 1998. Speciation durations and Pleistocene effects on vertebrate phylogeography. Proc. R. Soc. Lond. B 265, 1707-1712.
3. Bancroft, D.R., Pemberton, J.M., King, P., 1995. Extensive protein and microsatellite variability in an isolated, cyclic ungulate population. Heredity 74, 326-336.
4. Bowcock, A.M., Ruiz-Linares, A., Tomfohrde, J., Minch, E., Kidd, J.R., Cavalli-Sforza, L.L., 1994. High resolution of human evolutionary trees with polymorphic microsatellites. Nature 368, 455-457.
5. Camerano, L., 1914. Ricerche intorno ai camosci (Parte la). Memorie Della Regia Accademia Di Science Di Torino (Classe Science Fisiche Matematiche Naturali) 64, 1-82.
6. Cattaneo, C., Smillie, D.M., Gelsthorpe, K., et al., 1995. A simple method for extracting DNA from old skeletal material. Forensic Sci. Int. 74, 167-174.
7. Di Rienzo, A., Donnelly, P., Toomajian, C., Sisk, B., Hill, A., Petzl-Erler, M.L., Haines, G.K., Barch, D.H., 1998. Heterogeneity of microsatellite mutations within and between loci, implications for human demographic histories. Genetics 148, 1269-1284.
8. Estoup, A., Largiadèr, C.L., Perrot, E., Chourrout, D., 1996. Rapid one-tube DNA extraction for reliable PCR detection of fish polymorphic markers and transgenes. Mol. Mar. Biol. Biotechnol. 5, 295-298.
9. Felsestein, J., 1993. PHYLIP-phylogenetic Inference Package. Version 3.5c University of Washington, Seattle. Available from http://evolution.genetics.washington.edu/phylip/getme.html.
10. Fickel, J., Reinsch, A., 2000. Microsatellite markers for the European Roe deer (Capreolus capreolus). Mol. Ecol. 9, 994-995.
11. Forbes, S.F., Hogg, J.T., 1999. Assessing population structure at high levels of differentiation: Microsatellite comparisons of bighorn sheep and large carnivores. Anim. Conserv. 2, 223-233.
12. Forbes, S.H., Hogg, J.T., Buchanan, F.C., Crawford, A.M., Allendorf, F.W., 1995. Microsatellite evolution in congeneric mammas: Domestic and bighorn sheep. Mol. Biol. Evol. 12, 1106-1113.
13. Gaillard, J.M., 1992. Some demographic characteristics in ungulate populations and their implications for management and conservation. Ongulés/Ungulates 91, 493-495.
14. Goldstein, D.B., Ruiz-Linares, A., Cavalli-Sforza, L.L., Feldman, M.W., 1995. Genetic absolute dating based on microsatellites and the origin of modern humans. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 92, 6723-6727.
15. Goudet, J., 2000. FSTAT, a program to estimate and test gene diversities and fixation indices (version 2.9.1). Available from http://www.unil.ch/izea/softwares/fstat.html. Updated from Goudet (1995).
16. Hammer, S., Nadlinger, K., Hartl, G.B., 1995. Mitochondrial DNA differentiation in chamois (genus Rupicapra): Implications for taxonomy, conservation, and management. Acta Theriol. (Suppl. 3), 145-155.
17. Hewitt, G.M., 1996. Some genetic consequences of ice ages and their role in divergence and speciation. Biol. J. Linn. Soc. 58, 247-276.
18. Hundertmark, K.J., Shields, G.F., Udina, I.G., Bowyer, R.T., Danilkin, A.A., Schwartz, C.C., 2002. Mitochondrial phylogeography of moose (Alces alces): Late pleistocene divergence and population expansion. Mol. Phylogenet. Evol. 22, 375-387.
19. Kadwell, M., Fernandez, M., Stanley, H.F., Baldi, R., Wheeler, J.C., Rosadio, R., Bruford, M.W., 2001. Genetic analysis reveals the wild ancestors of the llama and the alpaca. Proc. R. Soc. Lond. B. Biol. Sci. 268, 2575-2584.
20. Leonard, J.A., Wayne, R.K., Cooper, A., 2000. Population genetics of Ice Age brown bears. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 97, 1651-1654.
21. Lovari, S., 1985. Behavioural repertoire of the Abruzzo chamois, Rupicapra pyrenaica ornata Neumann, 1899 (Artiodactyla: Bovidae). Säugetierkundliche Mitteilungen 32, 113-136.
22. Lovari, S., Scala, C., 1980. Revision of Rupicapra genus. I. A statistical re-evaluation of Couturier's data on the morphometry of six chamois subspecies. Boll. Zool. 47, 113-124.
23. MacHugh, D.E., Shriver, M.D., Loftus, R.T., Cunningham, P., Bradley, D.G., 1997. Microsatellite DNA variation and the evolution, domestication and phylogeography of taurine and zebu cattlex (Bos taurus and Bos indicus). Genetics 146, 1071-1086.
24. Masini, F., Lovari, S., 1988. Systematics, phylogenetic relationships, and dispersal of the chamois (Rupicapra spp.). Quaternary Res. 30, 339-349.
25. Minch, E., 1995. MICROSAT 1.4d, a Program for Calculating Distances from Microsatellite Data. Available from http://hpgl. stanford.edu/projects/microsat/.
26. Moritz, C., 1994. Defining "evolutionary significant units" for conservation. Trends Ecol. Evol. 9, 373-375.
27. Nascetti, G., Lovari, S., Lanfranchi, P., Berducou, C., Mattiucci, S., Rossi, L., et al., 1985. Revision of Rupicapra genus. III. Electrophoretic studies demonstrating species distinction of chamois populations of the Alps from those of the Apennines and Pyrenees. In: Lovari, S. (Ed.), The Biology and Management of Mountain Ungulates. Croom Helm, London, pp. 56-62.
28. Nei, M., 1972. Genetic distance between populations. Am. Nat. 106, 283-292.
29. Paetkau, D., Waits, L.P., Clarkson, P.L., Craighead, L., Strobeck, C., 1997. An empirical evaluation of genetic distance statistics using microsatellite data from bear (Ursidae) populations. Genetics 147, 1943-1957.
30. Paetkau, D., Amstrup, S.C., Born, E.W., Calvert, W., Derocher, A.E., Garner, G.W., et al., 1999. Genetic structure of the world's polar bear populations. Mol. Ecol. 8, 1571-1584.
31. Page, R.D.M., 2000. TreeViewPPC. Version 1.6.2 University of Glasgow, Scotland. Available from http://taxonomy.zoology.gla.ac.uk/rod/treeview.html. Updated from Page (1996).
32. Paulo, O.S., Dias, C., Bruford, M.W., Jordam, W.C., Nichols, R.A., 2001. The persistence of liocene populations through the Pleistocene climatic cycles: Evidence from the phylogeography of an Iberian lizard. Proc. R. Soc. Lond. B. Biol. Sci. 268, 1625-1630.
33. Pepin, L., Amigues, Y.L.A., Berthier, J.-L., Bensaid, A., Vaiman, D., 1995. Sequence conservation of micrasatellites between Bos taurus (cattle), Capra hircus (goat) and related species. Examples of use in parentage testing and phylogeny analysis. Heredity 74, 53-61.
34. Pérez, T., Albornoz, J., Domínguez, A., 2000. A panel of bovine and caprine microsatellites suitable as markers in chamois. Anim. Genet. 31, 344-345.
35. Polziehn, R.O., Hamr, J., Mallory, F.F., Strobeck, C., 2000. Micro-satellite analysis of North American wapiti (Cervus elaphus) populations. Mol. Ecol. 9, 1561-1576.
36. Raymond, M., Rousset, F., 1995. GENEPOP: Population genetics software for exact tests and ecumenicism. J. Hered. 86, 248-249.
37. Richard, M., Thorpe, R., 2001. Can microsatellites be used to infer phylogenies? Evidence from population affinities of the Western Canary Island lizard (Gallotia galloti). Mol. Phylogenet. Evol. 20, 351-360.
38. Roy, M.S., Geffen, E., Smith, D., Ostrander, E.A., Wayne, R.K., 1994. Patterns of differentiation and hybridation in North American wolflike canids, revealed by analysis of microsatellite loci. Mol. Biol. Evol. 11, 553-570.
39. Saitou, N., Nei, M., 1987. The neighbour-joining method: A new method for constructing phylogenetic trees. Mol. Biol. Evol. 4, 406-425.
40. Shriver, M.D., Jin, L., Boerwinkle, E., Deka, R., Ferrel, R.E., Chakraborty, R., 1995. A novel measure of genetic distance for highly poñymorphic tandem repeat loci. Mol. Biol. Evol. 12, 914-920.
41. Slatkin, M., 1995. A measure of population subdivision based on microsatellite allele frequencies. Genetics 139, 457-462.
42. Sokal, R.R., Rohlf, F.J., 1995. Biometry: The Principles and Practice of Statistics in Biological Research, Third Ed. Freeman and Company, New York.
43. Taberlet, P., Fumagalli, L., Wust-Saucy, A.G., Cosson, J.F., 1998. Comparative phylogeography and postglacial colonization routes in Europe. Mol. Ecol. 7, 453-464.
44. Takezaki, N., Nei, M., 1996. Genetic distances and reconstruction of phylogenetic trees from microsatellite DNA. Genetics 144, 389-399.
45. Vázquez, J.F., Pérez, T., Albornoz, J., Domínguez, A., 2000. Estimation of microsatellite mutation rates in Drosophila melanogaster. Genet. Res. 76, 323-326.
46. Weber, J.L., Wong, C., 1993. Mutation of human short tandem repeats. Hum. Mol. Genet. 2, 1123-1128.
47. Weir, B.S., 1996. Genetic Data Analisys II, Second Ed. Sinauer Associates Inc., Sunderland, USA.