Interaction of bifunctional carbonyl and phosphoryl ligands with M3+ lanthanide cations: How strong is the bidentate effect? The role of ligand size and counterions investigated by quantum mechanics

Physical Chemistry Chemical Physics

Volumn 4, Issue 23, 2002, Pages 5716-5729

  Coupez, Bernard ^a   Boehme, Christian ^a   Wipff, Georges ^a  

^a UNIVERSITÉ LOUIS PASTEUR   (France)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ACTINIDE; AMIDE; CARBONYL DERIVATIVE; CATION; CHLORINE; EUROPIUM; LANTHANIDE; LIGAND; METAL; NITRATE; PHOSPHORUS DERIVATIVE; YTTERBIUM;

ARTICLE; ATOM; BINDING SITE; CALCULATION; CHELATION; CHEMICAL BOND; CHEMICAL STRUCTURE; COMPLEX FORMATION; ENERGY; EXTRACTION; PARTICLE SIZE; PROTON TRANSPORT; QUANTUM MECHANICS; SIMULATION; STOICHIOMETRY;

EID: 0036435014     PISSN: 14639076     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1039/b207177k     Document Type: Article

References (72)

1. K. L. Nash, Solvent Extract. Ion Exch., 1993, 11, 729.
2. K. L. Nash, R. E. Barrans, R. Chiarizia, M. L. Dietz, M. P. Jensen and P. G. Rickert, Solvent Extract. Ion Exch., 2000, 18, 605.
3. A. M. Rozen and B. V. Krupnov, Russ. Chem. Rev., 1996, 65, 973.
4. L. Cecille, M. Casarci and L. Pietrelli, New Separation Chemistry Techniques for Radioctive Waste and other Specific Applications, ed. Commission of the European Communities, Elsevier Applied Science, London, New York, 1991.
5. F. A. Cotton and G. Wilkinson, Advanced Inorganic Chemistry, Wiley, 1988.
6. G. Schwarzenbach, Helv. Chim. Acta, 1952, 35, 2344.
7. R. T. Myers, Inorg. Chem., 1978, 17, 952.
8. R. D. Hancock, J. Chem. Educ., 1992, 69, 615.
9. E. L. Simmons, J. Chem. Educ., 1979, 56, 578.
10. F. A. Cotton and F. E. Harris, J. Phys. Chem., 1956, 60, 1451.
11. H. G. M. Edwards, E. Hickmott and M. A. Hughes, Spectrochim. Acta, Part A, 1997, 43, 53.
12. G. R. Choppin and A. Morgenstern, Solvent Extract. Ion Exch., 2000, 18, 1029.
13. P. P. Barthelemy and G. R. Choppin, Inorg. Chem., 1989, 28, 3354.
14. G. R. Choppin, J. Alloys Compd., 1997, 249, 1.
15. A. M. Rozen, J. Radioanal. Nucl. Chem., 1990, 143, 337.
16. D. R. Rosseinsky, J. Chem. Soc., Dalton Trans., 1979, 0, 732.
17. J. C. A. Boeyens and P. Comba, Coord. Chem. Rev., 2001, 212, 3.
18. R. D. Hancock, Prog. Inorg. Chem., 1989, 37, 187.
19. A. E. Martell, R. D. Hancock and R. J. Motekaitis, Coord. Chem. Rev., 1994, 133, 39.
20. C.-S. Chung, J. Chem. Educ., 1992, 61, 1062.
21. C. Boehme and G. Wipff, Inorg. Chem., 2002, 42, 727.
22. C. Boehme, B. Coupez and G. Wipff, J. Phys. Chem. A, 2002, 106, 6487.
23. R. W. Taft, in Physical Organic Chemistry, ed. R. W. Taft, John Wiley & Sons, New York, 1983, pp. 247.
24. M. J. Frisch, G. W. Trucks, H. B. Schlegel, G. E. Scuseria, M. A. Robb, J. R. Cheeseman, V. G. Zakrzewski, J. A. Montgomery, Jr., R. E. Stratmann, J. C. Burant, S. Dapprich, J. M. Millam, A. D. Daniels, K. N. Kudin, M. C. Strain, O. Farkas, J. Tomasi, V. Barone, M. Cossi, R. Cammi, B. Mennucci, C. Pomelli, C. Adamo, S. Clifford, J. Ochterski, G. A. Petersson, P. Y. Ayala, Q. Cui, K. Morokuma, D. K. Malick, A. D. Rabuck, K. Raghavachari, J. B. Foresman, J. Cioslowski, J. V. Ortiz, B. B. Stefanov, G. Liu, A. Liashenko, P. Piskorz, I. Komaromi, R. Gomperts, R. L. Martin, D. J. Fox, T. Keith, M. A. Al-Laham, C. Y. Peng, A. Nanayakkara, C. Gonzalez, M. Challacombe, P. M. W. Gill, B. Johnson, W. Chen, M. W. Wong, J. L. Andres, C. Gonzalez, M. Head-Gordon, E. S. Replogle and J. A. Pople, Gaussian 98; Revision A.5 Ed., Gaussian, Inc., Pittsburgh PA, 1998.
25. R. Schurhammer, V. Erhart, L. Troxler and G. Wipff, J. Chem. Soc., Perkin Trans. 2, 1999, 0, 2515.
26. C. Boehme and G. Wipff, Inorg. Chem., 1999, 38, 5734.
27. L. Maron and O. Eisenstein, J. Phys. Chem. A, 2000, 104, 7140.
28. G. Hong, F. Schautz and M. Dolg, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 1999, 121, 1502.
29. M. Dolg, H. Stoll, A. Savin and H. Preuss, Theor. Chim. Acta, 1989, 75, 173.
30. M. Dolg, H. Stoll, A. Savin and H. Preuss, Theor. Chim. Acta, 1993, 85, 441.
31. T. H. Dunning and P. J. Hay, in Methods of Electronic Structure Theory. Modern Theoretical Chemistry 3, Ed. H. F. Schaefer, III, Plenum Press, New York, 1977, pp. 1.
32. A. W. Ehlers, M. Böhme, S. Dapprich, A. Gobbi, A. Höllwarth, V. Jonas, K. F. Köhler, R. Stegmann, A. Veldkamp and G. Frenking, Chem. Phys. Lett., 1993, 208, 111.
33. S. F. Boys and F. Bernardi, Mol. Phys., 1970, 19, 553.
34. D. A. Case, D. A. Pearlman, J. C. Caldwell, T. E. Cheatham, III, W. S. Ross, C. L. Simmerling, T. A. Darden, K. M. Merz, R. V. Stanton, A. L. Cheng, J. J. Vincent, M. Crowley, D. M. Ferguson, R. J. Radmer, G. L. Seibel, U. C. Singh, P. K. Weiner, P. A. Kollman, AMBER5, University of California, San Francisco, 1997.
35. W. D. Cornell, P. Cieplak, C. I. Bayly, I. R. Gould, K. M. Merz, D. M. Ferguson, D. C. Spellmeyer, T. Fox, J. W. Caldwell and P. A. Kollman, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 1995, 117, 5179.
36. F. C. J. M. van Veggel and D. Reinhoudt, Chem. - Eur. J., 1999, 5, 90.
37. G. Sandrone, D. A. Dixon and B. P. Hay, J. Phys. Chem., 1999, 103, 3554.
38. C. Aleman, E. Navarro and J. Puiggali, J. Org. Chem., 1995, 60, 6135.
39. G. Y. S. Chan, M. G. B. Drew, M. J. Hudson, P. B. Iveson, J.-O. Liljenzin, M. Skalberg, L. Spjuth and C. Madic, J. Chem. Soc., Dalton Trans., 1997, 0, 649.
40. F. Berny and G. Wipff, J. Chem. Soc., Perkin Trans. 2, 2001, 73.
41. M. Baaden, F. Berny, C. Boehme, N. Muzet, R. Schurhammer and G. Wipff, J. Alloys Compd., 2000, 303-304, 104.
42. B. M. Rapko, B. K. McNamara, R. D. Rogers, G. A. Broker, G. J. Lumetta and B. P. Hay, Inorg. Chem., 2000, 39, 4858.
43. E. E. Castellano and R. W. Becker, Acta Crystallogr., Sect. B, 1981, B37, 61.
44. It should be noted that the conclusions drawn from these energy results do not always parallel those drawn from the structural parameters: with n = 1 the average Eu-O distances are about 0.01 A Å shorter for AcA than for AccA ligands, whereas with n = 3 or 4, they are longer (by 0.01 and 0.02 Å, respectively). This may be indicative of other effects (e.g. ligand-ligand repulsions) on the properties of the M-L bonds which may differ by as much as 0.1 Å for a given ligand (Figure S5†) as in related solid state structures. Thus, small changes in structural parameters should not be overinterpreted.
45. F. Berny, N. Muzet, L. Troxler, A. Dedieu and G. Wipff, Inorg. Chem., 1999, 38, 1244.
46. O. Clement, B. M. Rapko and B. P. Hay, Coord. Chem. Rev., 1998, 170, 203.
47. mono/bi difference should be larger. However, as mentioned above, no energy minimum could be located for its monodentate form.
48. C. Boehme and G. Wipff, J. Phys. Chem. A, 1999, 103, 6023.
49. M. Saunders, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 1987, 109, 3150.
50. R. Vargas, J. Garza, D. A. Dixon and B. P. Hay, J. Phys. Chem. A, 2002, 104, 5115.
51. F. H. Allen and O. Kennard, Chem. Des. Automation News, 1993, 8, 31.
52. B. M. Rapko, B. K. McNamara, R. B. Rogers, G. J. Lumetta and B. P. Hay, Inorg. Chem., 1999, 38, 4585.
53. 3·PccP. See Tables S4 and S5†.
54. vib.
55. M. Dobler, P. Guilbaud, A. Dedieu and G. Wipff, New J. Chem. 2001, 25, 1458.
56. 52 This binding mode change is in keeping with the enhanced steric crowding from the anions in the first coordination sphere.
57. E. E. Castellano and R. W. Becker, Acta Crystallogr., Sect. B, 1981, 37, 1998.
58. G. Lumetta, B. M. Rapko, P. A. Garza, B. P. Hay, R. D. Gilbertson, T. J. R. Weakly and J. E. Hutchinson, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 2002, 124, 5644.
59. C. den Auwer, M. C. Charbonnel, M. G. B. Drew, M. Grigoriev, M. J. Hudson, P. B. Iveson, C. Madic, M. Nierlich, M. T. Presson, R. Revel, M. L. Russell and P. Thuéry, Inorg. Chem., 2000, 39, 1487.
60. L. Rao, P. Zanonato, P. D. Bernardo and A. Bismondo, Inorg. Chim. Acta, 2000, 306, 49.
61. B. E. Stout, M. S. Caceci, F. Nectoux and M. Pages, Radiochim. Acta, 1989, 46, 181.
62. J. S. Preston and A. C. du Preez, Solvent Extract. Ion Exch., 1998, 16, 687.
63. L. Spjuth, J. O. Liljenzin, M. J. Hudson, M. G. B. Drew, P. B. Iveson and C. Madic, Solvent Extr. Ion Exch., 2000, 18, 1.
64. F. Emmenegger, C. W. Schlaepfer, H. Stoeckli-Evans, M. Piccand and H. Piekarski, Inorg. Chem., 2001, 40, 3884.
65. Other discussions, based on MM2 derived force field calculations can be found in refs. 17 and 66-68. It should be noted that the latter model steric effects with van der Waals contributions only (without electrostatics) and are fitted to condensed phase data and structures, implicitly assuming that the metal coordination properties are determined by the nature of the first coordination shell only.
66. R. D. Hancock and A. E. Martell, Chem. Rev., 1989, 89, 1875.
67. J. Beech, M. G. B. Drew and P. B. Leeson, Struct. Chem., 1996, 7, 153.
68. B. P. Hay, O. Clement, G. Sandrone and D. A. Dixon, Inorg. Chem., 1998, 37, 5887.
69. A. L. Derepas, J. M. Soudan, V. Brenner, J. P. Dognon and P. Millié, J. Comput. Chem., 2002, 23, 1013. See also recent MD result on water clusters with ions: E. Brodskaya, A. P. Lyubartsev and A. Laaksonen, J. Chem. Phys., 2002, 116, 7879.
70. A. L. Derepas, J. M. Soudan, V. Brenner, J. P. Dognon and P. Millié, J. Comput. Chem., 2002, 23, 1013. See also recent MD result on water clusters with ions: E. Brodskaya, A. P. Lyubartsev and A. Laaksonen, J. Chem. Phys., 2002, 116, 7879.
71. V. Böhmer, in Calixarenes for Separation, ACS Symp. Ser. 757, ed. G. Lumetta, R. Rogers and A. Gopalan, American Chemical Society, Washington DC, 2000, pp. 135.
72. H. Boerrigter, W. Verboom and D. N. Reinhoudt, J. Org. Chem., 1997, 62, 7148.