Generalized identity matching-to-sample in Cebus apella

Psychological Record

Volumn 52, Issue 4, 2002, Pages 441-460

  Da Silva Barros, Romariz ^a   De Faria Galvão, Olavo ^a   McIlvane, William J ^a  

^a NONE   (Brazil)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 0036434663     PISSN: 00332933     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/bf03395197     Document Type: Article

References (41)

1. Barros, R.S. (1998). Controle do comportamento por relações entre estímulos (Control of behavior by stimulus relations). Doctoral dissertation, São Paulo: Universidade de Sãto Paulo.
2. Blough, D.S. (1957). Spectral sensitivity in the pigeon. Journal of the Optical Society of America, 47, 827-833.
3. Brannon, E.M., & Terrace, H.S. (1998). Ordering of the numerosities 1 to 9 by monkeys. Science, 282, 746-749.
4. Carter, D.E., & Eckerman, D.A. (1975). Symbolic matching by pigeons: Rate of learning complex discriminations predicted from simple discriminations. Science, 187, 662-664.
5. Carter, D.E., & Werner, T.S. (1978). Complex learning and information processing by pigeons: A critical analysis. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 29, 565-601.
6. Cumming, W.W., & Berryman, R. (1965). The complex discriminated operant: Studies of matching-to-sample and related problems. In D.I. Mostofsky (Ed.), Stimulus generalization (pp. 284-330). Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
7. D'Amato, M.R., Salmon, D.R., & Colombo, M. (1985). Extent and limits of the matching concept in monkeys (Cebus apella). Journal of Experimental Psychology: Animal Behavior Processes, 11, 35-51.
8. Dube, W.V., Iennaco, F.M., & McIlvane, W.J. (1993). Generalized identity matching to sample of two-dimensional forms in individuals with intellectual disabilities. Research in Developmental Disabilities, 14, 457-477.
9. Dube, W.V., McIlvane, W.J., & Green, G. (1992). An analysis of generalized identity matching-to-sample test procedures. The Psychological Record, 42, 17-28.
10. Galvão, O.F. (1993). Classes funcionais e equivalência de estímulos. Psicologia: Teoria e Pesquisa, 9, 547-554. [Functional classes and stimulus equivalence].
11. Harlow, H.F. (1949). The formation of learning sets. Psychological Review, 56, 51-65.
12. Holcomb, W.L., Stromer, R., & Mackay, H.A. (1997).Transitivity and emergent sequence performances in young children. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 65, 96-124.
13. Hopkins, W.D., Washburn, D.A., & Rumbaugh, D.M. (1990). Processing of form stimuli presented unilaterally in humans, chimpanzees (Pan troglodytes), and monkeys (Macaca mulatta). Behavioral Neuroscience, 104, 577-582.
14. Iversen, I. (1997). Matching-to-sample performance in rats: A case of mistaken identity? Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 68, 27-46.
15. Iversen, I.H., Sidman, M., & Carrigan, P. (1986). Stimulus definition in conditional discriminations. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 45, 297-304.
16. Jacobs, G.H., Neitz, M., DEEGAN, J.E., II, & NEITZ, J. (1996). Trichromatic color vision in New World monkeys. Nature, 382, 156-158.
17. Kastak, D., & Sohusterman, R. (1994). Transfer of visual identity matching-to-sample in two California sea lions (Zalophus californianus). Animal Learning & Behavior, 22, 427-435.
18. Lashley, K.S. (1938). Conditional reactions in the rat. Journal of Psychology, 6, 311-324.
19. Lionello, K.M., & Urcuioli, P.J. (1998). Control by sample location in pigeons matching to sample. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 70, 235-251.
20. McIlvane, W.J., & CATALDO, M.F. (1996). On the clinical relevance of animal models for the study of human mental retardation. Mental Retardation and Developmental Disabilities Research Reviews, 2, 188-196.
21. McIlvane, W.J., Deutsch, C.K., Serna, R.W., & Dube, W.V. (1998). Behavior analytic assessment of intellectual functioning and disability: An interface between research with nonhumans and humans with limited language. In S.A. Soraci & W.J. McLlvane, Perspectives on fundamental processes in intellectual functioning (pp. 215-239). Ablex: Stamford, CT.
22. McIlvane, W.J., & Dube, W.V. (1992). Stimulus control shaping and stimulus control topographies. The Behavior Analyst, 15, 89-94.
23. McIlvane, W.J., & Dube, W.V. (1996). Naming as facilitator of discrimination. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 65, 267-272.
24. McIlvane, W.J., Dube, W.V., Kledaras, J.B., Iennaco, F.M., & STODDARD, L.T. (1990). Teaching relational discrimination to individuals with mental retardation: Some problems and possible solutions. American Journal on Mental Retardation, 95, 283-296.
25. McIlvane, W.J., Kledaras, J.B., Iennaco, F.M., McDonald, S.J. & Stoddard, L.T. (1995). Some possible limits on errorless discrimination reversals in individuals with severe mental retardation. American Journal on Mental Retardation, 99, 430-440.
26. McIlvane, W.J., Serna, R.W., Dube, W.J., & Stromer, R. (2000). Stimulus control topography coherence and stimulus equivalence: Reconciling test outcomes with theory. In J. Leslie & D.E. Blackman (Eds.), Issues in experimental and applied analyses of human behavior (pp. 85-110). Reno: Context Press.
27. McIntire, K.D., Cleary, J., & Thompson, T. (1987), Conditional relations by monkeys: Reflexivity, symmetry, and transitivity. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 47, 279-285.
28. Oden, D.L., Thompson, R.K.R., & Premack, D. (1988) Spontaneous transfer of matching by infant chimpanzees (Pan troglodytes). Journal of Experimental Psychology: Animal Behavior Processes, 14, 140-145.
29. Ray, B.A. (1969). Selective attention: The effects of combining the stimuli, which control incompatible behavior. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 12, 539-550.
30. Saunders, K.J. (1989). Naming in conditional discrimination and stimulus equivalence. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 51, 379-384.
31. Serna, R.W., Dube, W.V., & McIlvane, W.J. (1997). Assessing same/different judgements in individuals with severe intelectual disabilities: A status report. Research in Developmental Disabilities, 18, 343-368.
32. Sidman, M. (1992). Adventitious control by the location of comparison stimuli in conditional discriminations. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 58, 173-182.
33. Silveira, L.C.L., Lee, B.B., Yamada, E.S., Kremers, J., & Hunt, D.M. (1998). Post-receptoral mechanisms of colour vision in New World primates. Vision Research, 38, 3329-3337.
34. Stromer, R., McIlvane, W.J., & Serna, R.W. (1993). Complex stimulus control and equivalence. The Psychological Record, 43, 585-598.
35. Washburn, D.A., Hopkins, W.D., & Rlimbaugh, D.A. (1989). Video-task assessment of learning and memory in macaques (Macaca mulatta): Effects of stimulus movement on performance. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Animal Behavior Processes, 15, 393-400.
36. Wilkinson, K.M., Dube, W.V., & McIlvane, W.J. (1996). A crossdisciplinary perspective on studies of rapid word mapping in psycholinguistics and behavior analysis. Developmental Review, 16, 125-148.
37. Wright, A.A., Cook, R.G., Rivera, J.J., Sands, S.F., & Delius, J.D. (1988). Concept learning by pigeons: Matching-to-sample with trial-unique video picture stimuli. Animal Learning and Behavior, 16, 436-444.
38. Wright, A.A., & Cumming, W.W. (1971). Color-naming functions for the pigeon. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 15, 7-17.
39. Zentall, T.R. (1996). An analysis of stimulus class formation in animals. In T.R. Zentall & P.M. Smeets (Eds.), Stimulus class formation in humans and animals (pp. 197-218). Amsterdam: Elsevier.
40. Zentall, T.R., Edwards, C.A., Moore, B.S., & Hogan, D.E. (1981). Identity: The basis for both matching and oddity learning in pigeons. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Animal Behavior Processes, 7, 70-86.
41. Zentall, T.R., & Hogan, E. (1978). Same/different concept learning in the pigeon: The effect of negative instances and prior adaptation to transfer stimuli. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 30, 177-186.