An original look at originalism

Law and Society Review

Volumn 36, Issue 1, 2002, Pages 113-137

  Howard, Robert M ^a   Segal, Jeffrey A ^a  

^a STONY BROOK UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 0036434497     PISSN: 00239216     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.2307/1512194     Document Type: Article

References (77)

1. Ball, Howard, & Phillip J. Cooper (1992) Of Power and Right. New York: Oxford Univ. Press.
2. Barnett, Randy E. (1999) "An Originalism for Nonoriginalists," 45 Loyola Law Rev. 611-54.
3. Baum, Lawrence (1995) The Supreme Court, 5th ed. Washington, DC: Congressional Quarterly Press.
4. Baumeister, Roy, & Leonard Newman (1994) "Self-Regulation of Cognitive Inference and Decision Processes," 20 Personality & Social Psychology Bulletin 3-19.
5. Bork, Robert H. (1971) "Neutral Principles and Some First Amendment Problems." 47 Indiana Law J. 1-35.
6. Boucher, Robert, & Jeffrey A. Segal (1995) "Supreme Court Justices as Strategic Decision Makers: Offensive Grants and Defensive Denials on the Vinson Court," 57 J. of Politics 824-37.
7. Brennan, William J. (1985) "Remarks of Justice William J. Brennan, Jr.," in The Great Debate. Washington, DC: Federalist Society.
8. Brenner, Saul, & John F. Krol (1989) "Strategies in Certiorari Voting on the United States Supreme Court," 51 J. of Politics 828-41.
9. Brest, Paul (1980) "The Misconceived Quest for the Original Understanding," 60 Boston Univ. Law Rev. 204-38.
10. Carter, Lief H. (1985) Contemporary Constitutional Lawmaking. New York: Pergamon Press.
11. Davis, Sue (1989) Justice Rehnquist and the Constitution. Princeton, NJ: Princeton Univ. Press.
12. Dworkin, Ronald (1986) Law's Empire. Cambridge, MA: Belknap Press.
13. _ (1997) "The Arduous Virtue of Fidelity: Originalism, Scalia, Tribe, and Nerve," 65 Eordham Law Rev. 1249-68.
14. Ely, John Hart (1980) Democracy and Distrust: A Theory of Judicial Review. Cambridge, MA: Harvard Univ. Press.
15. Epstein, Lee, & Jack Knight (1998) Choices Justices Make. Washington, DC: Congressional Quarterly Press.
16. Epstein, Lee, & Joseph F. Kobylka (1992) The Supreme Court and Legal Change. Chapel Hill, NC: Univ. of North Carolina Press.
17. Epstein, Lee, & Carol Mershon (1995) "Measuring Political Preferences," 40 American J. of Political Science 261-94.
18. Epstein, Lee, & Thomas G. Walker (1995) "The Role of the Supreme Court in American Society: Playing the Reconstruction Game," in L. Epstein, ed., Contemplating Courts. Washington, DC: Congressional Quarterly Press.
19. Epstein, Lee, Jeffrey A. Segal, Harold J. Spaeth & Thomas G. Walker (1996) The Supreme Court Compendium, 2d ed., Washington, DC: Congressional Quarterly Press.
20. eskridge, William N., Jr. (1991) "Reneging on History? Playing the Court/Congress/President Civil Rights Game." 79 California Law Rev. 613-84.
21. Farber, Daniel (1989) "The Originalism Debate: A Guide for the Perplexed," 49 Ohio State Law J. 1085-106.
22. Ferejohn, John, & Charles Shipan (1990) "Congressional Influence on Bureaucracy," 6 J. of Law Economics & Organization 1-20.
23. Ferejohn, John, & Barry Weingast (1992) "A Positive Theory of Statutory Interpretation." 12 International Rev. of Law & Economics 263-79.
24. Gely, Rafael, & Pablo T. Spiller (1990) "A Rational Choice Theory of Supreme Court Decision Making with Applications to the State Farm and Grove City Cases," 6 J. of Law, Economics & Organizations 263-300.
25. George, Tracey E., & Lee Epstein (1992) "On the Nature of Supreme Court Decision Making," 86 American Political Science Rev. 323-37.
26. Gerber, Scott Douglas (1995) To Secure these Rights: The Declaration of Independence and Constitutional Interpretation. New York: New York Univ. Press.
27. Gibson, James (1983) "From Simplicity to Complexity: The Development of Theory in the Study of Judicial Behavior," 5 Political Behavior 7-49.
28. Gibson, James L. (1991) "Decision Making in Appellate Courts," in J.B. Gates & C.A. Johnson, eds., The American Courts: A Critical Assessment. Washington, DC: Congressional Quarterly Press.
29. Gillman, Howard (1993) The Constitution Besieged: The Rise and Demise of Lochner Era Police Power Jurisprudence. Durham, NC: Duke Univ. Press.
30. _ (2001) "What's Law Got to Do with It?" 26 Law & Social Inquiry 465-504.
31. Goldstein, Leslie (1991) In Defense of the Text. Savage, MD: Rowman & Littlefield.
32. Graber, Mark (2000) Personal Correspondence. 18 July.
33. Greenawalt, Kent (1992) Law and Objectivity. New York: Oxford Univ. Press.
34. Iyengar, Shanto, & Donald Kinder (1987) News that Matters: Television and American Opinion. Chicago: Univ. of Chicago Press.
35. Iyengar, Shanto, & William McGuire (1993) Explorations in Political Psychology. Durham, NC: Duke Univ. Press.
36. Kahn, Jessica (2000) "An Empirical Study of the Effects of Stare Decisis on Appellate Court Judges of the Fourth Circuit," typescript, Univ. of Chicago.
37. Kahn, Ronald (1994) The Supreme Court and Constitutional Theory. Lawrence, KS: Univ. of Kansas Press.
38. _ (1999) "Interpretive Norms and Supreme Court Decision Making: The Rehnquist Court on Privacy and Religion," in C.W. Clayton & H. Gillman, eds., Supreme Court Decision Making: New Institutionalist Approaches. Chicago: Univ. of Chicago Press.
39. Kahneman, Daniel, & Amos Tversky (1984) "Choices, Values, and Frames," 39 American Psychologist 341-50.
40. Karsten, Peter (1997) Heart vs. Head: Judge-Made Law in Nineteenth Century America. Chapel Hill: Univ. of North Carolina Press.
41. King, Gary, Robert O. Keohane & Sidney Verba (1994) Designing Social Inquiry. Princeton, NJ: Princeton Univ. Press.
42. Knight, Jack, & Lee Epstein (1996) "The Norm of Stare Decisis," 40 American J. of Political Science 1018-35.
43. Kornhauser, Lewis (1995) "Adjudication by a Resource-Constrained Team: Hierarchy and Precedent in a Judicial System," 68 Southern California Law Rev. 1605-29.
44. Kort, Fred (1963) "Content Analysis of Judicial Opinions and Rules of Law," in G. Schubert, ed., Judicial Decision Making. Glencoe, IL: Free Press.
45. Kunda, Ziva (1990) "The Case for Motivated Reasoning," 108 Psychological Bulletin 480-98.
46. Lazarus, Edward (1998) Closed Chambers: The First Eyewitness Account of the Epic Struggles Inside the Supreme Court. New York: Times Books.
47. Levinson, Sanford (1996) "The Limited Relevance of Originalism in the Actual Performance of Legal Roles," 19 Harvard J. of Law & Public Policy 495-508.
48. Mansbridge, Jane J., ed. (1990) Beyond Self-Interest. Chicago: Univ. of Chicago Press.
49. Markovits, Richard S. (1998) Matters of Principle: Legitimate Legal Argument and Constitutional Interpretation. New York: New York Univ. Press.
50. Marks, Brian A. (1988) A Model of Judicial Influence on Congressional Policymaking: Grove City College v. Bell. Working papers in Political Science, P-88-7, The Hoover Institution, Stanford Univ.
51. Meese, Edwin, III (1986) "Speech Before the American Bar Association," The Great Debate. Washington, DC: Federalist Society.
52. Nichol, Gene R. (1999) "Justice Scalia and the Printz Case: The Trials of an Occasional Originalist," 70 Univ. of Colorado Law Rev. 953-73.
53. Phelps, Glenn A., & John B. Gates (1991) "The Myth of Jurisprudence: Interpretive Theory in the Constitutional Opinions of Justices Rehnquist and Brennan," 31 Santa Clara Law Rev. 567-96.
54. Powell, H. Jefferson (1988) Symposium: "The Republican Civic Tradition: Reviving Republicanism," 97 Yale Law J. 1703-12.
55. Rakove, Jack N. (1996) Original Meanings: Politics and Ideas in the Making of the Constitution. New York: Alfred A. Knopf.
56. Riker, William H. (1990) "Political Science and Rational Choice," in J.E. Alt & K.A. Shepsle, eds., Perspectives on Positive Political Economy. New York: Cambridge Univ. Press.
57. Scalia, Antonin (1997) A Matter of Interpretation. Princeton, NJ: Princeton Univ. Press.
58. Schubert, Glendon (1965) The Judicial Mind: The Attitudes and Ideologies of Supreme Court Justices, 1946-1963. Evanston, IL: Northwestern Univ. Press.
59. Schultz, David A., & Christopher E. Smith (1996) The Jurisprudential Vision of Justice Antonin Scalia. Lanham, MD: Rowman & Littlefield.
60. Segal, Jeffrey A. (1997) "Separation of Power Games in the Positive Theory of Congress and Courts," 91 American Political Science Rev. 28-44.
61. Segal, Jeffrey A., & Albert D. Cover (1989) "Ideological Values and the Votes of U.S. Supreme Court Justices," 83 American Political Science Rev. 557-65.
62. Segal, Jeffrey A., Lee Epstein, Charles M. Cameron & Harold J. Spaeth (1995) "Ideological Values and the Votes of U.S. Supreme Court Justices Revisited," 57 J. of Politics 812-23.
63. Segal, Jeffrey A., & Robert M. Howard (2001) "Litigant Requests to Overturn Precedent in the U.S. Supreme Court, 1985-1994," 85 Judicature 148-57.
64. Segal, Jeffrey A., & Harold J. Spaeth (1993) The Supreme Court and the Attitudinal Model. New York: Cambridge Univ. Press.
65. _ (2002) The Supreme Court and the Attitudinal Model Revisited. New York: Cambridge Univ. Press.
66. Smith, Christopher E. (1997) "Clarence Thomas: A Distinctive Justice," 28 Seton Hall Law Rev. 1-28.
67. Songer, Donald R., & Susan Haire (1992) "Integrating Alternative Approaches to the Study of Judicial Voting: Obscenity Cases in the U.S. Court of Appeals." 36 American J. of Political Science 963-82.
68. Spaeth, Harold J. (1964) "The Judicial Restraint of Mr. Justice Frankfurter-Myth or Reality?" 8 Midwest J. of Political Science 22-38.
69. Spaeth, Harold J., & Jeffrey A. Segal (1999) Majority Rule Versus Minority Will: Adherence to Precedent on the U.S. Supreme Court. New York: Cambridge Univ. Press.
70. _ (2000) "The U.S. Supreme Court Judicial Database: Providing New Insights into the Court," 83 Judicature 228-35.
71. Spiller, Pablo T., & Rafael Gely (1992) "Congressional Control or Judicial Independence: The Determinants of U.S. Supreme Court Labor-Relations Decisions, 1949-1988," 23 RAND J. of Economics 463-92.
72. Symposium: "Originalism, Democracy, and the Constitution" (1996) 19 Harvard J. of Law & Public Policy 237-532.
73. Ulmer, S. Sidney (1972) "The Decision to Grant Certiorari as an Indicator to Decision 'On the Merits.'" 4 Polity 429-47.
74. _ (1978) "Selecting Cases for Supreme Court Review: An Underdog Model," 72 American Political Science Rev. 902-10.
75. Wechsler, Herbert (1959) "Toward Neutral Principles of Constitutional Law," 73 Harvard Law Rev. 1-35.
76. Whittington, Keith E. (1999) Constitutional Interpretation: Textual Meaning, Original Intent, and Judicial Review. Lawrence, KS: Univ. of Kansas Press.
77. Zlotnick, David M. (1999) "Justice Scalia and His Critics: An Exploration of Scalia's Fidelity to His Constitutional Methodology," 48 Emory Law J. 1377-1429.