Correspondences and comparisons in international and domestic conflict resolution

Negotiation Journal

Volumn 18, Issue 4, 2002, Pages 363-369

  Menkel Meadow, Carrie ^a  

^a GEORGETOWN UNIVERSITY LAW CENTER   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 0036432139     PISSN: 07484526     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1023/A:1021058307590     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (7)

1. Elster, J. 1995. Strategic uses of argument. In Barriers to conflict resolution, edited by K. Arrow et al. New York: W.W. Norton.
2. Ignatieff, M. 1993. Blood and belonging: Journeys into the new nationalism. New York: Farrar, Straus, & Giroux.
3. Malley, R. and H. Agha. 2001. Camp David: The tragedy of errors. New York Review of Books 48 (8 August 2001): 59-65.
4. Menkel-Meadow, C. 2000. When winning isn't everything: The Lawyer as problem solver. Hofstra Law Review 28: 905-923.
5. -. 2001a. Negotiating with lawyers, men and things: The contextual approach still matters. Negotiation Journal 17: 257-293.
6. -. 2001b. And now a word about secular humanism: Spirituality, and the practice of justice and conflict resolution. Fordham Urban Law Journal 28: 1073-1087.
7. Mitchell, G. J. 1999. Making peace. Berkeley: University of California Press.