The relationship of diabetes mellitus performance indicators with self-reported health and patient satisfaction

Disease Management and Health Outcomes

Volumn 10, Issue 11, 2002, Pages 707-713

  Nau, David P ^a   Kumar, Ritesh N ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ALBUMIN; GLUCOSE; HEMOGLOBIN A1C; INSULIN; LIPID;

ADULT; AGED; ARTICLE; BLOOD GLUCOSE MONITORING; COMORBIDITY; DEMOGRAPHY; DIABETES MELLITUS; DIABETIC FOOT; DISEASE DURATION; DISEASE SEVERITY; FEMALE; HEALTH STATUS; HUMAN; LABORATORY TEST; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; PATIENT CARE; PATIENT EDUCATION; PATIENT MONITORING; PATIENT SATISFACTION; PERFORMANCE; PHYSICAL EXAMINATION; SELF REPORT;

EID: 0036425430     PISSN: 11738790     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.2165/00115677-200210110-00004     Document Type: Article

References (26)

1. Mokdad AH, Bowman BA, Ford ES, et al. The continuing epidemics of obesity and diabetes in the United States. JAMA 2001; 286: 1195-200
2. Mokdad AH, Ford ES, Bowman BA, et al. Diabetes trends in the U.S.: 1990-1998. Diabetes Care 2000; 23: 1278-83
3. American Diabetes Association. Standards of medical care for persons with diabetes mellitus. Diabetes Care 2001; 24: S33-43
4. Beckles GL, Englegau MM. Narayan KM, et al. Population based assessment of the level of care among adults with diabetes in the U.S. Diabetes Care 1998; 21: 1432-8
5. Donabedian A. Explorations in quality assessment and monitoring. In: Donabedian A. editor. The Definition of Quality and Approaches to its Assessment. Ann Arbor (MI): Health Administration Press, 1980: 79-128
6. Kerr EA, Krein SL, Vijan S, et al. Avoiding pitfalls in chronic disease quality measurement: A case for the next generation of technical quality measures. Am J Manag Care 2001; 7: 1033-43
7. National Committee for Quality Assurance. The State of Managed Care Quality Report, 2001. Available at URL: http://www.ncqa.org/somc2001/ [Accessed 2002, Sep 19]
8. Diabetes Quality Improvement Project. Diabetes Quality Improvement Project Initial Measure Set (Final Version). 1998. Available at URL: http://www.ncqa.org/dprp/dqip2.htm [Accessed 2002, Sep 19]
9. Younger MS. Handbook for Linear Regression. North Scituate (MA): Duxbury Press, 1979
10. Diabetes Control and Complications Trial Research Group. The effect of intensive treatment of diabetes on the development and progression of long-term complications in insulin-dependent diabetes mellitus. N Engl J Med 1993; 329: 977-86
11. UK Prospective Diabetes Study Group. Intensive blood-glucose control with sulphonylureas or insulin compared with conventional treatment and risk of complications in patients with type 2 diabetes (UKPDS 33). Lancet 1998; 352: 837-53
12. Wasserman J, Boyce-Smith G, Hopkins DSP, et al. A comparison of diabetes patients' self-reported health status with hemoglobin A1c test results in 11 California health plans. Manag Care 2001 Mar [Online]. Available at URL: http://www.managedcaremag.com
13. Goddijn PP, Bilo HJ, Feskens EJ, et al. Longitudinal study on glycemic control and quality of life in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus referred for intensified control. Diabetes Med 1999; 16: 23-30
14. Tilly KF, Belton AB, Mclachlan JF. Continuous monitoring of health status outcomes: Experience with a diabetes education program. Diabetes Educ 1995:21: 413-9
15. Anderson RM, Fitzgeral JT. Wisdom K, et al. A comparison of global versus disease-specific quality-of-life measures in patient with NIDDM. Diabetes Care 1997; 20: 299-305
16. Johnson JA, Nowatzki TE, Coons SJ. Health-related quality of life of diabetic Pima Indians. Med Care 1996; 34: 97-102
17. Nerenz DR, Repasky DP, Whitehouse FW, et al. Ongoing assessment of health status in patients with diabetes mellitus. Med Care 1992; 30: MS112-24
18. Weinberger M, Kirkman MS, Samsa GP, et al. The relationship between glycemic control and health-related quality of life in patients with non-insulin-dependent diabetes mellitus. Med Care 1994; 32: 1173-81
19. Oliver RL. Satisfaction: A Behavioral Perspective on the Consumer. New York (NY): McGraw-Hill, 1997
20. Piette JD, Weinberger M, McPhee SJ. The effect of automated calls with telephone nurse follow-up on patient-centered outcomes of diabetes care. Med Care 2000; 38: 218-30
21. Sadur CN, Moline N, Costa M, et al. Diabetes management in a health maintenance organization. Diabetes Care 1999; 22: 2011-7
22. Clark CM, Snyder JW, Meek RL, et al. A systematic approach to risk stratification and intervention within a managed care environment improves diabetes outcomes and patient satisfaction. Diabetes Care 2001; 24: 1079-86
23. Glasgow RE, Ruggiero L, Eakin EG, et al. Quality of life and associated characteristics in a large national sample of adults with diabetes. Diabetes Care 1997; 20:562-7
24. Piette JD. Satisfaction with care among patients with diabetes in two public health care systems. Med Care 1999; 37: 538-46
25. Covinsky KE, Rosenthal GE, Chren MM, et al. The relationship between health status change and patient satisfaction in older hospitalized medical patients. J Gen Intern Med 1998; 13: 223-9
26. Hall JA, Milbun MA, Epstein AM. A causal model of health status and patient satisfaction with medical care. Med Care 1993; 31: 84-94