Anticipating law: Research methods, ethics, and the law of privilege

Sociological Methodology

Volumn 32, Issue , 2002, Pages 1-17

  Palys, Ted ^a   Lowman, John ^a  

^a SIMON FRASER UNIVERSITY   (Canada)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 0036424053     PISSN: 00811750     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/1467-9531.00107     Document Type: Article

References (26)

1. Bond K. 1978. "Confidentiality and the Protection of Human Subjects in Social Science Research: A Report on Recent Developments." American Sociologist 13: 144-52.
2. Brajuha, M., and L. Hallowell. 1986. "Legal Intrusion and the Politics of Field Work: The Impact of the Brajuha Case." Urban Life 14:454-78.
3. Caroll, J., and C. Knerr. 1973. "Confidentiality of Social Science Research Sources and Data: The Popkin Case." Political Science Quarterly 6:268-80.
4. _. 1975. "A Report of the APSA Confidentiality in Social Science Research Data Project." Political Science Quarterly 8:258-61.
5. Cecil, J., and G.T. Wetherington, eds. 1996. Court-Ordered Disclosure of Academic Research: A Clash of Values of Science and Law. Special Edition of Law and Contemporary Problems 59 (3).
6. Crabb, B.B. 1996. "Judicially Compelled Disclosure of Researchers' Data: A Judge's View." Law and Contemporary Problems 59(3):9-34.
7. Daisley, B. 1994. "Clear Evidence Needed to Invoke Wigmore Rules." Lawyer's Weekly. December 9: 28.
8. Fanning, J. 1999. "Privacy and Research: Public Policy Issues." Office of the Assistant Secretary for Planning and Evaluation, U.S. Department of Health and Human Services. Unpublished paper.
9. Jackson, M., and M. MacCrimmon. 1999. "Research Confidentiality and Academic Privilege: A Legal Opinion." Submission prepared for the Simon Fraser University Ethics Policy Review Task Force. Available at 〈http://www.sfu.ca/̃palys/ JackMacOpinion.pdf〉.
10. Lempert, R.O., and S.A. Saltzburg. 1982. A Modern Approach to Evidence: Text, Problems, Transcripts and Cases, 2nd ed. St. Paul, MN: West Publishing.
11. Levine, F., and J.M. Kennedy. 1999. "Promoting a Scholar's Privilege: Accelerating the Pace." Law and Social Inquiry 24:967-76.
12. Lowman, J., and T.S. Palys. 2000. "Ethics and Institutional Conflict of Interest: The Research Confidentiality Controversy at Simon Fraser University." Sociological Practice: A Journal of Clinical and Applied Sociology 2(4):245-55.
13. _. Forthcoming. "The Ethics and Law of Confidentiality in Criminological Research." International Journal of Criminal Justice.
14. Madden, T.J., and H.S. Lessin. 1983. "Statutory Approaches to Ensuring the Privacy and Confidentiality of Social Science Research Information: The Law Enforcement Assistance Administration Experience." Pp. 263-72 in Solutions to Ethical and Legal Problems in Social Research, edited by R.F. Boruch and J.S. Cecil. New York: Academic Press.
15. McLaughlin, R.H. 1999. "From the Field to the Courthouse: Should Social Science Research be Privileged?" Law and Social Inquiry 24: 927-66.
16. Nelson, R.L., and T.E. Hedrick. 1983. "The Statutory Protection of Confidential Research Data: Synthesis and Evaluation." Pp. 213-38 in Solutions to Ethical and Legal Problems in Social Research, edited by R.F. Boruch and J.S. Cecil New York: Academic Press.
17. O'Neil, R.M. 1996. "A Researcher's Privilege: Does Any Hope Remain?" Law and Contemporary Problems 59 (3):35-50.
18. Palys, T.S., and J. Lowman. 2000. "Ethical and Legal Strategies for Protecting Confidential Research Information." Canadian Journal of Law and Society 15 (1): 39-80.
19. Picou, J.S. 1996. "Compelled Disclosure of Scholarly Research: Some Comments on "High Stakes" Litigation." Law and Contemporary Problems 59 (3):149-57.
20. Scarce, R. 1994. "(No) Trial (But) Tribulations: When Courts and Ethnography Conflict." Journal of Contemporary Ethnography 23:123-49.
21. _. 1999. "Good Faith, Bad Ethics: When Scholars Go the Distance and Scholarly Associations Do Not." Law and Social Inquiry 24:977-86.
22. Sopinka, J., S.N. Lederman, and A.W. Bryant 1992. The Law of Evidence in Canada. Toronto, Canada: Butterworths.
23. Traynor, M. 1996. "Countering the Excessive Subpoena for Scholarly Research." Law and Contemporary Problems 59 (3):119-48.
24. Wiggins, E.C., and J.A. McKenna. 1996. "Researchers' Reactions to Compelled Disclosure of Scientific Information." Law and Contemporary Problems 59 (3):67-94.
25. Wigmore, J.H. 1905. A Treatise on the System of Evidence in Trials at Common Law, Including the Statutes and Judicial Decisions of Ail Jurisdictions of the United States, England, and Canada. Boston, MA: Little, Brown.
26. Wolfgang, M. 1981. "Criminology: Confidentiality in Criminological Research and Other Ethical Issues." Journal of Criminal Law and Criminology 72:345-61.