The effectiveness of computer-assisted instruction on teaching the skill of setting in volleyball

Journal of Human Movement Studies

Volumn 43, Issue 2, 2002, Pages 151-164

  Vernadakis, Nicholas ^a   Zetou, E ^a   Antoniou, P ^a   Kioumourtzoglou, E ^a  

^a ARISTOTLE UNIVERSITY OF THESSALONIKI   (Greece)

Author keywords

Computer assisted instruction; Motor skill; Multimedia technology; Setting in volleyball; Traditional instruction

Indexed keywords

ADOLESCENT; ARTICLE; COMPUTER SYSTEM; CONTROLLED STUDY; EDUCATIONAL TECHNOLOGY; FEMALE; HUMAN; HUMAN EXPERIMENT; LEARNING; MALE; NORMAL HUMAN; PHYSICAL PERFORMANCE; SCHOOL CHILD; SKILL; SPORT;

EID: 0036421089     PISSN: 03067297     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (31)

1. Adams, T., Waldrop, P. and Justen, J. (III) (1989). Effects of Voluntary vs Required Computer-Assisted Instruction on Student achievement. Phys. Educator, 46: 213-217.
2. Alvarez-Pons, F. A. (1992). The Effectiveness of Computer-Assisted Instruction in Teaching Sport Rules, Scoring Procedures, and Terminology. Florida State University, (Doctoral Dissertation), University Microfilms International, O.N 9234205.
3. Bowman, A. (1995). Teaching ethics: Telling stories. Nurse Educ. Today, 15: 33-8.
4. Bradford, S. and Rolayne, W. (1993). Assessing Sport Skills. Human Kinetics, Champaign, IL.
5. Castellan, N. (1993). Evaluating information technology in teaching and learning. Behavior. Res. Methods Instruments & Computers, 25: 233-237.
6. Deere, R., Wright, K. and Solomon, H. (1995). A comparison of student performance following instruction by computer assisted instruction versus traditional lecture method for an undergraduate athletic training program. KAHPERD Journal, 8: 18-20.
7. Goggin, N. L., Finkenberg, M. E. and Morrow, J. R. (1997). Instructional technology in higher education teaching. Quest, 49: 280-290.
8. Gregger, R. and Metzler, M. (1992). PSI for a college physical education basic instructional program. Educ. Technol., 32: 51-56.
9. Gross, R. (1995). Defining the new mandate for distance learning in the 21st century. Community College J., 66: 28-33.
10. Guthrie, M. and McPherson, M. (1992). An evaluation of customized approach to computer assisted instruction in undergraduate physical education. In Proceedings of the International Conference on Computer Applications in Sport and Physical Education. Wingate Institute, The Zinman College, (Edited by G. Tenenbaum, T. Raz-Liebermann and Z. Artzi), Netanya, pp. 91-96.
11. Hathaway, M. (1984). Variables of computer screen display and how they affect learning. Educ. Technol., 24: 7-11.
12. Kerns, M. (1989). The effectiveness of computer-assisted instruction in teaching tennis rules and strategies. J. Teach. Phys. Ed., 8: 170-176.
13. Kirkendall, R., Gruber, J. and Johnson, E. (1980). Measurement and Evaluation for Physical Education. Wm. C. Brown, Dubuque, IA.
14. Lehmann, H., Freedman, J., Massad, J. and Dintzis, R. (1999). An ethnographic, controlled study of the use of a computer-based histology atlas during a laboratory course. J. Am. Med. Inform. Assn., 6: 38-52.
15. Lieber, J. and Semmel, M. I. (1985). Effectiveness of computer application to instruction to mildly handicapped learners: A review. Rem. Spec. Educ. 6: 5-12.
16. McLean, D. D. (1996). Use of Computer-Based Technology in Health, Physical Education, Recreation and Dance. ERIC, ED390874
17. Mohnsen, B. (1995). Using technology in physical education. Teaching High School Phys. Educ., 1(2), 1, 4-5, 8.
18. Mohnsen, B. and Thompson, C. (1994-5). Teaching biomechanics through interactive laser disks. The Computing Teacher, 22: 30-32.
19. Mohnsen, B., Thompson, C. and Mendon, K. (1996). Effective ways to use technology. Teaching Secondary Phys. Educ., 2: 14-17.
20. Nicol, M. and Anderson, A. (1999). Computer-assisted vs. teacher-directed teaching of numeracy in adults. J. Comput. Assist. Learn., 16: 184-192.
21. Papandreou, C. A. and Adamopoulos, X. D. (1998). Modelling a multimedia communication system for education and training. Comput. Commun., 21: 584-589.
22. Ross, J. R. (1994). A Comparison of Direct Instruction and Computer Assisted Instruction on Learning a Motor Skill by Fourth Grade Students. Microform Publications Int. Institute for Sport and Human Performance. Univ. Of Oregon.
23. Safrit, M., Ennis, C. and Nagle, F. (1988). The use of problem-solving skills in computer-aided instruction: An evaluation. J. Comput. Assist. Learn., 4: 227-232.
24. Schuelke, D. and King, D. T. (1983). New technology in the classroom: Computers and communication and the future. J. Technol. Horizons in Educ., 10: 95-100.
25. Silverman, S. (1997). Technology and physical education: Present, possibilities and potential problems. Quest, 49: 306-314.
26. Steffen, J. and Hansen, G. (1987). Effect of computer assisted instruction on the development of cognitive and psychomotor learning in bowling. J. Teach. Phys. Ed., 6: 183-191.
27. Stein, J. (1984). Part II: Microcomputers uses to promote physical proficiency and motor development of students with handicapped conditions. Phys. Educator, 41: 30-36.
28. Summers, A. N., Rinehart, G. C., Simpson, D. and Redlich, P. N. (1999). Acquisition of surgical skills: A randomized trial of didactic, videotape, and computer-based training. Surgery, 126: 330-336.
29. Tsai, S. and Pohl, N. (1977). Student achievement in computer programming: Lecture vs. computer-aided instruction. J. Exp. Educ., 46: 66-70.
30. West, P. (1995). Clinton pushes school - Technology campaign. Education Week, 18: 23.
31. West, P. (1996). Many governors touting technology as a magic bullet. Education Week, 1: 22-23.