Institutionalising international norms;Institusjonalisering av internasjonale normer. Føre-var-prinsippets rolle på miljøog matvareområdet

Internasjonal Politikk

Volumn 60, Issue 3, 2002, Pages

  Veggeland, Frode ^a  

^a NONE

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 0036420930     PISSN: 0020577X     EISSN: 18911757     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Review

References (60)

1. Arbitral Tribune (2000) Southern Bluefin Tuna Case -Australia and New Zealand v. Japan. Award on Jurisdiction and Admissibility, August 4, 2000. Rendered by the Arbitral Tribunal constituted under Annex VII of the United Nations Convention on the Law of the Sea. Tilgjengelig på hjemmesidene til ICSID (International Centre for Settlement of Investment Disputes): http:// www.worldbank.org/icsid/.
2. Bodansky, Daniel (1995) «Customary (and Not So Customary) International Environmental Law)», Indiana Journal of Global Legal Studies 3 (1): 105-120.
3. Borgen, Svein Ole & Frode Veggeland (2002) Changing the Codex: The Role of International Institutions. Working Paper 2002-16. Norwegian Agricultural Economics Research Institute.
4. Buflod, Magnus, Knut Anders Sannes & Kristoffer Aasebø (red.) (2001) Folkerettslig tekstsamling. Oslo: Cappelen Akademisk Forlag.
5. Byers, Michael (red.) (2000) The Role of Law in International Politics. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
6. CAC (2000) Codex Alimentarius Commission. Procedural Manual. Eleventh edition. Rome: Food and Agricultural Organization of the United Nations/ World Health Organization.
7. CAC (2001a) Report of the Sixteenth Session of the Codex Committee on General Principles. Paris, France, 23-27 April 2001. Document # Alinorm 01/33A.
8. CAC (2001b) Report of the Twenty-fourth Session of the Codex Alimentarius Commission. WHO Headquarters, Geneva, 2-7 July 2001. Document # Alinorm 01/41.
9. CAC (2002), Proposed Draft Working Principles for Risk Analysis. Codex Committee on General Principles, Seventeenth Session, Paris, France, 15-19 April 2002. Document # CX/GP 02/3.
10. Cameron, James (1994) «The Status of the Precautionary Principle in International Law» i Timothy O'Riordan & James Cameron (red.) Interpreting the Precautionary Principle. London: Cameron May.
11. Cameron, James (1999) «The Precautionary Principle» i GP Sampson & W. Bradnee Chambers (red.) Trade, Environment and the Millennium. Tokyo, New York, Paris: United Nations University Press.
12. Churchill, Robert R. & Geir Ulfstein (2000) «Autonomous Institutional Arrangements in Multilateral Agreements: A Little-Noticed Phenomenon in International Law», American Journal of Internantional Law 94 (4): 623-659.
13. Coleman, Robert J. (2002) Tale holdt pä konferansen «The US, Europe, and Precaution: A Comparative Case Study Analysis of the Management of Risk in a Complex World», Grand Hotel-Bruges, 11-12 January 2002. Tilgjengelig på hjemmesidene til EU, Health and Consumer Protection Directorate General: http://europa.eu.int/comm/dgs/health_consumer/library/speeches/ index_en.html.
14. Elvbakken, Kari Tove (1997) Offentlig kontroll av næringsmidler. Institusjonalisering, apparat og tjenestemenn. Rapport nr. 50. Institutt for administrasjon og orgamsasjonsvitenskap, Universitetet i Bergen.
15. European Commission (2000) Communication from the European Commission on the Precautionary Principle. Document # COM(2000)1.
16. European Communities (2002) Regulation (EC) No. 178/2002 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 28 January 2002 laying down the general principles and requirements of food law, establishing the European Food Safety Authority and laying down procedures in matters of food safety. Official Journal of the European Communities, Official Journal L 031, 01/02/2002 P. 0001 - 0024.
17. European Court of Justice (1998) C-209/96 (United Kingdom v. Commission). Judgement of the Court 5 May 1998.
18. European Court of Justice (2001) C-1/00 (Commission v. France). Judgement of the Court 13 December 2001.
19. Fleischer, Carl August (2000) Folkerett. Oslo: Universitetsforlaget.
20. Freestone, David & Ellen Hey (1996) The Precautionary Principle and International Law: the Challenge of Implementation. International Environmental Law and Policy Series, Vol. 31. The Hague: Kluwer.
21. Hohmann, Harald (1994) Precautionary Legal Duties and Principles of Modern International Environmental Law: The Precautionary Principle: International Environmental Law Between Exploitation and Protection. I serien International Environmental Law and Policy Series. London: Graham & Trotman.
22. Hovi, Jon (2001) Føre var-prinsippet som rasjonelt beslutningskriterium. CICERO Working Paper 2001:13.
23. International Centre for Settlement of Investment Disputes. Udatert. In the Dispute Concerning Southern Bluefin Tuna. Australia v. Japan. Statement of Claim and Grounds on Which it is Based. Tilgjengelig på hjemmesidene: http://www.worldbank.org/icsid/.
24. International Court of Justice (1974) Nuclear Tests (New Zealand v. France). Judgement of 20 December 1974. Tilgjengelig på hjemmesidene: http://www.icj-cij.org/.
25. International Court of Justice (1995) Request for an Examination of the Situation with Paragraph 63 of the Court's Judgement of 20 December 1974 in the Nuclear Tests (New Zealand v France) Case. Order of 22 September 1995. General List No. 97. Tilgjengelig på hjemmesidene: http://www.icj-cij.org/.
26. International Court of Justice (1997) Case Concerning the Gabcikovo-Nagymaros Project (Hungary/Slovakia). Judgement of 25 September 1997. General List No. 92. Tilgjengelig på hjemmesidene: http://www.icj-cij.org/.
27. International Tribunal for the Law of the Sea (1999) Southern Bluefin Tuna Cases. New Zealand v. Japan; Australia v. Japan. Order 27 August 1999. List of cases: No. 3 and 4. Tilgjengelig på hjemmesidene: http://www.itlos.org/.
28. International Tribunal for the Law of the Sea (2001a) In the Dispute Concerning the MOX Plant, International Movements of Radioactive Materials, and the Protection of the Marine Environment of the Irish Sea (Ireland v. United Kingdom). Request for Provisional Measures and Statement of Case of Ireland, 9 November 2001. Tilgjengelig pä hjemmesidene: http://www.itlos.org/.
29. International Tribunal for the Law of the Sea (2001 b) The Mox Plant Case (Ireland v. United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland). Request for Provisional Measures. Written response of the United Kingdom, 15 November 2001. Tilgj engelig på hjemmesidene: http://www.itlos.org/.
30. International Tribunal for the Law of the Sea (2001c) The Mox Plant Case (Ireland v. United Kingdom. Request for Provisional Measures. Order. List of cases: No. 10. Tilgjengelig på hjemmesidene: http://www.itlos.org/.
31. Majone, Giandomenico (2002) «The Precautionary Principle and its Policy Implications», Journal of Common Market Studies 40 (1): 89-109.
32. Morgenthau, Hans J. (1962) Politics among Nations: The Struggle for Power and Peace. 3rd ed. New York: Alfred A. Knopf.
33. Møse, Erik (red.) (2001) Folkerettslige tekster. Oslo: Uinversitetsforlaget.
34. Olsen, Johan P. (2002) The Many Face, of Europeanization. ARENA Working Paper 01/2.
35. O'Riordan, Timothy & James Cameron (1994) «The History and Contemporary Significance of the Precautionary Principle» i Timothy O'Riordan & James Cameron (red.) Interpreting the Precautionary Principle. London: Cameron May.
36. O'Riordan, Timothy & James Cameron (red.) (1994) Interpreting the Precautionary Principle. London: Cameron May.
37. OECD (2001) Compendium of National Food Safety Systems and Activities. Ad Hoc Group on Food Safety. Document # SG/ADHOC/FS(2000)5/ANN/FINAL.
38. Palmer, Sir Geoffrey (2001) The Development of the Precautionary Approach at International Law. Paper presentert på seminaret «Precaution in Environmental Risk Management: A Review of Recent Policy and Practise», Environmental Risk Management Authority, 30 November 2001, Wellington.
39. Ruud, Morten & Geir Ulfstein (1998) Innføring i folkerett. Oslo: Tano Aschehoug.
40. Sampson, G.P. & W. Bradnee Chambers (red.) (1999) Trade, Environment and the Millennium. Tokyo, New York, Paris: United Nations University Press.
41. Ulfstein, Geir, Hans Chr. Bugge, Ole Kristian Fauchald & Inger Johanne Sand (2000) Folkerettslige rammer for norsk milføpolitikk. Rapport nr 18, oktober 2000. Oslo: Makt- og demokratiutredningen 1998-2003.
42. UNEP & IISD (2000) Environment and Trade. A Handbook. The United Nations Environment Programme/The International Institute for Sustainable Development.
43. USA (2000) United States Food Safety System. Precaution in U.S. Food Safety Decisionmaking: Annex II to the United States' National Food Safety System Paper. Food and Drug Administration, U.S. Department of Agriculture, March 32000. Tilgjengelig på hjemmesidene til U.S. Government Food Safety Information: http://www.foodsafety.gov/̃fsg/fssyst4.html.
44. Veggeland, Frode (2000) «Eksterne sjokk og institusjonell endring. Kugalskap- saken og reformer i EU», Nordiske Organisasjons Studier 2 (2): 29-63.
45. Veggeland, Frode (2001) «Effekter ay internasjonale regimer: WTO og 'hormon- saken' mellom EU og USA», InternasjonalPolitikk 59 (3): 333-366.
46. Victor, David G. (1997) Effective Multilateral Regulation of Industrial Activity: Institutions for Policing and Adjusting Binding and Nonbinding Legal Commitments. Dr. Philos. Dissertation. Massachusetts Institute of Technology.
47. Wiener, Jonatan B. & Michael D. Rogers (2001) Comparing Precaution in the United States and Europe. Working Paper 2001-01. Duke Center for Environmental Solutions.
48. WTO (1995) Statement made by the FAO/WHO Codex Alimentarius Commission at the meeting of 15-16 November 1995. Document # G/SPS/W/42.
49. WTO (1997) EC Measures Concerning Meat and Meat Products (Hormones). Complaint by the United States. Report of the Panel. Document # WT/DS26/ R/USA.
50. WTO (1998) EC Measures Concerning Meat and Meat Products (Hormones). Complaint by the United States. Report of the Appellate Body. Document # WT/DS26/AB/R & WT/DS48/AB/R.
51. WTO (1999) Preparations for the 1999 Ministerial Conference. EC Approach to Trade and Environment in the New WTO Round. Communication from the European Communities. Document # WT/GC/W/194.
52. WTO (2000a) Communication from the European Commission on the Precautionary Principle. Committee on Sanitary and Phytosanitary Measures. Document # G/SPS/GEN/168.
53. WTO (2000b) Communication from the European Commission on the Precautionary Principle. Committee on Trade and Environment. Document # WT/ CTE/W/147 & Document # G/TBT/W/137.
54. WTO (2000c) Summary of the Meeting held on 15-16 March 2000. Note by the Secretariat. Committee on Sanitary and Phytosanitary Measures. Document # G/SPS/R/18.
55. WTO (2000d) Minutes of the Meeting held on 5-6 July 2000. Committee on Trade and Environment. Note by the Secretariat. Document # WT/CTE/M/24.
56. WTO (2000e), Minutes of the Meeting held on 6 October 2000. Committee on Technical Barriers to Trade. Document # G/TBT/M/21.
57. WTO (2001 a) Minutes of the Meeting held on 13-14 February 2001. Note by the Secretariat. Committee on Trade and Environment. Doctanent # WT/CTE/ M/26.
58. WTO (2001b) Minutes of the Meeting held on 30 March 2001. Committee on Technical Barriers to Trade. Document # G/TBT/M/23.
59. WTO (2001c) European Council Resolution on the Precautionary Principle. Submission by the European Communities. Document # G/SPS/GEN/225 & Document # G/TBT/W/154 & Document # WT/CTE/W/181.
60. WTO (2001d) Ministerial Declaration. Adopted on 14 November 2001. Document # WT/MIN(01)/DEC/1.