Policy issues in environmental health disputes

Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science

Volumn 584, Issue NOV., 2002, Pages 175-202

  Brown, Phil ^a   Zavestoski, Stephen ^c   Mayer, Brian ^a   McCormick, Sabrina ^a   Webster, Pamela S ^b  

^a BROWN UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF RHODE ISLAND   (United States)

^c NONE

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 0036417597     PISSN: 00027162     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1177/000271620258400113     Document Type: Review

References (20)

1. Baltz, Davis. 1999. Endocrine regulation comes into regulatory focus. New Solutions 9:29-35.
2. Bell, Michael M. 1998. An invitation to environmental sociology. Thousand Oaks, CA: Pine Forge.
3. Breast Cancer Fund and Breast Cancer Action. 2002. State of the evidence: What is the connection between chemicals and breast cancer? Edited by Nancy Evans. Retrieved 14 April 2002 from http://www.breastcancerfund.org/environment_evidence_ main.htm.
4. Brown, Phil, Steve Zavestoski, Sabrina MCCormick, Joshua Mandelbaum, Theo Luebke, and Meadow Linder. 2001. A gulf of difference: Disputes over Gulf War-related illnesses. Journal of Health and Social Behavior 42 (2): 235-57.
5. Centers for Disease Control (CDC). 2001. National report on human exposure to environmental chemicals. Retrieved 14 April 2002 from http://www.cdc.gov/nceh/dls/report/.
6. General Accounting Office. 2002. VA and defense health care: Progress made, but DoD continues to face military medical surveillance system challenges. Washington, DC: General Accounting Office.
7. Greenhouse, Linda. 2001. P.A.'s authority on air rules wins Supreme Court's backing. New York Times, 28 February, p.A1.
8. Hollander, Rachelle. 1984. Institutionalizing public social science: Its perils and promise. In Citizen participation in science policy, edited by James C. Peterson, 76-95. Amherst: University of Massachusetts Press.
9. National Breast Cancer Coalition. 2001. Priority #6 - Fact sheet. Retrieved 14 April 2002 from http://www.natlbcc.org/.
10. National Institutes of Health (NIH). 2000. Request for proposals: Environmental justice: Partnership for communication. Retrieved 30 May 2000 from http://grants.nih.gov/grants/guide/rfa-files/RFA-ES-99-005.html.
11. National Research Council. 1997. Research priorities for airborne particulate matter. Washington, DC: National Research Council.
12. Northridge, M. E., J. Yankura, P. L. Kinney, R. M. Santella, P. Shepard, Y. Riojas, M. Aggarwal, and P. Strickland. 1999. Diesel exhaust exposure among adolescents in Harlem: A community-driven study. American Journal of Public Health 89 (7): 998-1002.
13. O'Fallon, Liam R., Frederick L. Tyson, and Allen Dearry. 2000. Successful models of community-based participatory research. Washington, DC: National Institute of Environmental Health Sciences.
14. Pew Environmental Health Commission. 2000. Attack asthma: Why America needs a public health defense system to battle environmental threats. In Request for proposals: Environmental justice: Partnerships for communication. Baltimore, MD: Pew Environmental Health Commission.
15. Ricks, Thomas. 2000. Anthrax shots cause military exodus. Washington Post, 11 October.
16. Schnaiberg, Allan. 1980. The environment: From surplus to scarcity. New York: Oxford University Press.
17. Sclove, Richard. 1995. Democracy and technology. New York: Guilford.
18. Stolberg, Sheryl Gay. 2001. U.S. reports disease link to Gulf War. New York Times, 11 December.
19. Thornton, Joe. 2001. Pandora's poison: Chlorine, health, and a new environmental strategy. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
20. Vastag, Brian. 2001. CDC unveils first report on toxins in people. Journal of the American Medical Association 285 (14): 1827-28.