OTFACT: Multi-level performance-oriented software with an assistive technology outcomes assessment protocol

Technology and Disability

Volumn 14, Issue 3, 2002, Pages 133-139

  Smith, Roger O ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN MILWAUKEE   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; COMPUTER PROGRAM; FUNCTIONAL ASSESSMENT; GENERAL MEDICAL AIDS; INFORMATION PROCESSING; OUTCOMES RESEARCH; QUESTIONNAIRE; RATING SCALE; RELIABILITY; TASK PERFORMANCE; TAXONOMY; TECHNOLOGY; VALIDATION PROCESS;

EID: 0036415246     PISSN: 10554181     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.3233/tad-2002-14309     Document Type: Article

References (16)

1. American Occupational Therapy Association Representative Assembly, Uniform terminology for reporting occupational therapy services, American Occupational Therapy Association, Rockville, MD, 1979.
2. American Occupational Therapy Association, Uniform terminology for occupational therapy - 2nd Ed, The American Journal of Occupational Therapy 43 (1989), 808-815.
3. B.J. Hemphill-Pearson, ed., Assessments in occupational therapy mental health: An integrate approach, Slack Incorporated, Thorofare, NJ, 1999.
4. C.A. Bhasin and G.A. Goodman, The use of OT FACT categories to analyze activity configurations of individuals with multiple sclerosis, The Occupational Therapy Journal of Research 12(2) (1992), 67-79.
5. D. Shriver, M. Mitchum, S. Schwartzberg and M.H. Ranucci, Uniform occupational therapy evaluation checklist, in: A Productivity Systems Guide for Occupational Therapy, J. Bair and C.H. Gwin, eds, American Occupational Therapy Association, Rockville, MD, 1985, pp. 18-19.
6. J. Hammel, J.S. Sai and T. Heller, Functional outcomes of assistive technology for adults with developmental disabilities, Proceedings of the RESNA Annual Conference, Arlington, VA, 1999.
7. J. Warnke, A comparison study of OT FACT with the SF-36 Health Survey, M.S. Thesis, University of Wisconsin-Milwaukee, 2001.
8. K.L. Rust and R.O. Smith, Use of functional outcome measures to assess orthogonal dimensions of function [Abstract], Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation 73 (1992), 982.
9. M.E. Tinetti, D.I. Baker, M. Gottschalk, C.S. Williams, D. Pollack, P. Garrett, T.M. Gill, R.A. Marottoli and D. Acampora, Home-based multicomponent rehabilitation program for older persons after hip fracture: a randomized trial, Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation 80(8) (1999), 916-922.
10. R.O. Smith and R. Barris, Comprehensive functional assessment: Strategy and framework [Abstract], Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation 66 (1985), 569.
11. R.O. Smith, Using the Occupational Therapy Comprehensive Functional Assessment (OTCFA) to evaluate the efficacy of technological intervention in rehabilitation, Proceedings of the RESNA Annual Conference, Arlington, VA, 1987.
12. R.O. Smith, OT FACT, version 2.0. [Computer software]. American Occupational Therapy Association, Rockville, MD, 1994, 1995.
13. R.O. Smith and N. Davel, Functional impact of assistive technology on people with hemiplegia from stroke, Proceedings of the RESNA Annual Conference, Arlington, VA, 1996.
14. R.O. Smith, OT FACT, version 2.03. [Computer software manual]. American Occupational Therapy Association, Rockville, MD, 1998.
15. R.O. Smith, OT FACT applications in mental health, in: Assessments in Occupational Therapy Mental Health: An Integrative Approach, B.J. Hemphill-Pearson, ed., Slack Incorporated, Thorofare, NJ, 1999, pp. 289-307.
16. World Health Organization, International classification of impairments, disabilities and handicaps, The World Health Organization, Geneva, Switzerland, 1980.