Re: GPs' views on computerized drug interaction alerts

Journal of Clinical Pharmacy and Therapeutics

Volumn 27, Issue 5, 2002, Pages 311-312

  Ashworth, M ^a  

^a KING'S COLLEGE LONDON   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

AMOXICILLIN; BETA ADRENERGIC RECEPTOR BLOCKING AGENT; LITHIUM; PENICILLIN G;

ACCREDITATION; ASTHMA; COMPUTER SYSTEM; DRUG HYPERSENSITIVITY; ERROR; GENERAL PRACTITIONER; HUMAN; INFORMATION PROCESSING; MALPRACTICE; MEDICAL INFORMATION SYSTEM; MEDICAL PRACTICE; NOTE; PRESCRIPTION; RISK MANAGEMENT; DRUG INTERACTION; HEALTH PERSONNEL ATTITUDE; MEDICAL RECORD; PHYSIOLOGY; STATISTICS;

ATTITUDE OF HEALTH PERSONNEL; DRUG INTERACTIONS; HUMANS; MEDICAL RECORDS SYSTEMS, COMPUTERIZED; PHYSICIANS, FAMILY;

EID: 0036408170     PISSN: 02694727     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1046/j.1365-2710.2002.00433.x     Document Type: Note

References (6)

1. Magnus D, Rodgers S, Avery AJ. (2002) GP's views on computerized drug interaction alerts: Questionnaire survey. Journal of Clinical Pharmacy and Therapeutics, 27, 377-382.
2. Sexton B, Thomas E, Helmrich R. (2000) Error, stress, and teamwork in medicine and aviation: Cross sectional surveys. British Medical Journal, 320, 745-749.
3. Department of Health. (2001) An Organisation with a Memory. London: The Stationery Office.
4. www.doh.gov.uk/buildsafenhs/ch5.htm#research (accessed 28/5/02).
5. Armstrong D. Ashworth M. (2000) When questionnaire response rates do matter: A survey of general practitioners and their views of NHS changes. British Journal of General Practice, 50, 479-480.
6. Smeeth L, Fletcher A. (2002) Improving the response rates to questionnaires. British Medical Journal, 324, 1168-1169.