Temporal cues in the antiphonal long-calling behaviour of cottontop tamarins

Animal Behaviour

Volumn 64, Issue 3, 2002, Pages 427-438

  Ghazanfar, Asif A ^a   Smith Rohrberg, Duncan ^a   Pollen, Alex A ^a   Hauser, Marc D ^a  

^a HARVARD UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

CALLING BEHAVIOR; COMMUNICATION; PRIMATE; RECOGNITION;

ANTHROPOIDEA; PRIMATES; SAGUINUS; SAGUINUS OEDIPUS;

EID: 0036402303     PISSN: 00033472     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1006/anbe.2002.3074     Document Type: Article

References (65)

1. Andrew, R. J. 1963. Origins and evolution of the calls and facial expressions of the primates. Behaviour, 20, 1-108.
2. Becker, P. 1982. The coding of species-specific characteristics in birds. In: Acoustic Communication in Birds. Vol. 1 (Ed. by D. E. Kroodsma & E. H. Miller), pp. 213-252. New York: Academic Press.
3. Boinski, S. 2000. Social manipulation within and between troops mediates primate group movement. In: On the Move: How and Why Animals Travel in Groups (Ed. by S. Boinski & P. A. Garber), pp. 421-469. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
4. Bosch, J., Rand, A. S. & Ryan, M. J. 2000. Acoustic competition in Physalaemus pustulosus, a differential response to calls of relative frequency. Ethology, 106, 865-871.
5. Cheney, D. L., Seyfarth, R. M. & Palombit, R. 1996. The function and mechanisms underlying baboon contact barks. Animal Behaviour, 52, 507-518.
6. Cleveland, J. & Snowdon, C. T. 1982. The complex vocal repertoire of the adult cotton-top tamarin, Saguinus oedipus oedipus. Zeitschrift für Tierpsychologie, 58, 231-270.
7. Cohen, J. 1988. Statistical Power Analysis for the Behavioral Sciences. 2nd edn. Hillsdale, New Jersey: L. Erlbaum.
8. Doherty, J. A. 1985. Trade-off phenomena in calling song recognition and phonotaxis in the cricket, Gryllus bimaculatus (Orthoptera, Gryllidae). Journal of Comparative Physiology, 156, 787-801.
9. Doherty, J. A. & Hoy, R. R. 1985. Communication in insects. III. the auditory behavior of crickets: some views of genetic coupling, song recognition, and predator detection. Quarterly Review of Biology, 60, 457-472.
10. Emlen, S. T. 1972. An experimental analysis of the parameters of bird song eliciting species recognition. Behaviour, 41, 130-171.
11. Ewing, A. M. 1989. Arthropod Bioacoustics, Neurobiology and Behavior. Ithaca, New York: Cornell University Press.
12. Fischer, J. 1998. Barbary macaques categorize shrill barks into two call types. Animal Behaviour, 55, 799-807.
13. Fischer, J., Metz, M., Cheney, D. L. & Seyfarth, R. M. 2001. Baboon responses to graded bark variants. Animal Behaviour, 61, 925-931.
14. Fitch, W. T. 1997. Vocal tract length and formant frequency dispersion correlate with body size in rhesus macaques. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 102, 1213-1222.
15. Fitch, W. T. & Kelley, J. P. 2000. Perception of vocal tract resonances by whooping cranes, Grus americana. Ethology, 106, 559-574.
16. Fritzsch, B., Ryan, M. J., Wilczynski, W., Hetherington, T. E. & Walkowiak, W. 1988. The Evolution of the Amphibian Nervous System. New York: J. Wiley.
17. Gerhardt, H. C. 1981. Mating call recognition in the barking treefrog (Hyla gratiosa): responses to synthetic mating calls and comparisons with the green treefrogs (Hyla cinerea). Journal of Comparative Physiology A, 144, 17-25.
18. Gerhardt, H. C. 1991. Female mate choice in treefrogs: static and dynamic acoustic criteria. Animal Behaviour, 42, 615-635.
19. Gerhardt, H. C. 1992. Multiple messages in acoustic signals. Seminars in the Neurosciences, 4, 391-400.
20. Gerhardt, H. C. 1994. The evolution of vocalization in frogs and toads. Annual Review of Ecology and Systematics, 25, 293-324.
21. Ghazanfar, A. A., Flombaum, J. I., Miller, C. T. & Hauser, M. D. 2001. The units of perception in the antiphonal calling behavior of cotton-top tamarins. (Saguinus oedipus): playback experiments with long calls. Journal of Comparative Physiology A, 187, 27-35.
22. Ghazanfar, A. A., Smith-Rohrberg, D. & Hauser, M. D. 2002. The role of temporal cues in conspecific vocal recognition: rhesus monkey orienting asymmetries to reversed calls. Brain, Behavior, and Evolution, 58, 163-172.
23. Gouzoules, H. & Gouzoules, S. 1989. Design features and developmental modifications of pigtail macaque, Macaca nemestrina, agonistic screams. Animal Behaviour, 37, 383-401.
24. Gouzoules, H. & Gouzoules, S. 2000. Agonistic screams differ among four species of macaques: the significance of motivation-structure rules. Animal Behaviour, 59, 501-512.
25. Green, S. 1975. Variation of vocal pattern with social situation in the Japanese monkey (Macaca fuscata): a field study. In: Primate Behavior, Vol. 4 (Ed. by L. A. Rosenblum), pp. 1-102. New York: Academic Press.
26. Hauser, M. D. 1993. The evolution of nonhuman primate vocalizations: effects of phylogeny, body weight, and social context. American Naturalist, 142, 528-542.
27. Hauser, M. D. & Andersson, K. 1994. Left hemisphere dominance for processing vocalizations in adult, but not infant, rhesus monkeys: field experiments. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, U.S.A., 91, 3946-3948.
28. Hauser, M. D., Agnetta, B. & Perez, C. 1998. Orienting asymmetries in rhesus monkeys: effect of time-domain changes on acoustic perception. Animal Behaviour, 56, 41-47.
29. Holland, J., Dabelsteen, T. & Paris, A. L. 2000. Coding in the song of the wren: importance of rhythmicity, syntax and element structure. Animal Behaviour, 60, 463-470.
30. Kroodsma, D. E. & Miller, E. H. 1996. Ecology and Evolution of Acoustic Communication in Birds. Ithaca, New York: Cornell University Press.
31. Lengagne, T., Aubin, T., Jouventin, P. & Lauga, J. 2000. Perceptual salience of individually distinctive features in the calls of adult king penguins. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 107, 508-516.
32. Le Prell, C. G. & Moody, D. B. 1997. Perceptual salience of acoustic features of Japanese monkey coo calls. Journal of Comparative Psychology, 111, 261-274.
33. Le Prell, C. G. & Moody, D. B. 2000. Factors influencing the salience of temporal cues in the discrimination of synthetic Japanese monkey (Macaca fuscata) coo calls. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Animal Behavioral Processes, 26, 261-273.
34. McConnell, P. B. & Snowdon, C. T. 1986. Vocal interactions between unfamiliar groups of captive cotton-top tamarins. Behaviour, 97, 273-296.
35. Marler, P. 1961. The logical analysis of animal communication. Journal of Theoretical Biology, 1, 295-317.
36. Marler, P. 1968. Aggregation and dispersal: two functions in primate communication. In: Primates: Studies in Adaptation and Variability (Ed. by P. C. Jay), pp. 420-438. New York: Holt, Rinehart & Winston.
37. Mathevon, N. & Aubin, T. 2001. Sound-based species-specific recognition in the black cap Sylvia atricapilla shows high tolerance to signal modifications. Behaviour, 138, 511-524.
38. May, B., Moody, D. B. & Stebbins, W. C. 1988. The significant features of Japanese macaque coo sounds: a psychophysical study. Animal Behaviour, 36, 1432-1444.
39. Miller, C. T. & Ghazanfar, A. A. 2002. Meaningful acoustic units in nonhuman primate vocal behavior. In: The Cognitive Animal (Ed. by C. Allen, M. Bekoff & G. M. Burghardt), pp. 265-273. Cambridge, Massachusetts: MIT Press.
40. Miller, C. T., Dibble, E. & Hauser, M. D. 2001. Amodal completion of acoustic signals by a nonhuman primate. Nature Neuroscience, 8, 783-784.
41. Mitani, J. C. 1985. Responses of gibbons (Hylobates muelleri) to self, neighbor, and stranger duets. International Journal of Primatology, 6, 193-200.
42. Mitani, J. C. & Marler, P. 1989. A phonological analysis of male gibbon singing behavior. Behaviour, 109, 20-45.
43. Mitani, J. & Nishida, T. 1993. Contexts and social correlates of long distance calling by male chimpanzees. Animal Behaviour, 45, 735-746.
44. Narins, P. M. & Capranica, R. R. 1978. Communicative significance of the two-note call of the treefrog Eleutherodactylus coqui. Journal of Comparative Physiology A, 127, 1-9.
45. Nelson, D. A. 1988. Feature weighting in species song recognition by the field sparrow (Spizella pusilla). Behaviour, 88, 145-189.
46. Newman, J. D., Lieblich, A., Talmage-Riggs, G. & Symmes, D. 1978. Syllable classification and sequencing in twitter calls of squirrel monkeys (Saimiri sciureus). Zeitschrift für Tierpsychologie, 47, 77-88.
47. Neyman, P. F. 1978. Aspects of the ecology and social organization of free-ranging cotton-top tamarins (Saguinus oedipus) and the conservation status of the species. In: The Biology and Conservation of the Callitrichidae (Ed. by D. G. Kleiman), pp. 39-71. Washington: Smithsonian Institution Press.
48. Owren, M. J. 1990a. Acoustic classification of alarm calls by vervet monkeys (Cercopithecus aethiops) and humans (Homo sapiens): I. Natural calls. Journal of Comparative Psychology, 104, 20-28.
49. Owren, M. J. 1990b. Acoustic classification of alarm calls by vervet monkeys (Cercopithecus aethiops) and humans (Homo sapiens): II. Synthetic calls. Journal of Comparative Psychology, 104, 29-40.
50. Rendall, D., Rodman, P. S. & Emond, R. E. 1996. Vocal recognition of individuals and kin in free-ranging rhesus monkeys. Animal Behaviour, 51, 1007-1015.
51. Rendall, D., Owren, M. J. & Rodman, P. S. 1998. The role of vocal tract filtering in identity cueing in rhesus monkey (Macaca mulatta) vocalizations. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 103, 602-614.
52. Rendall, D., Cheney, D. L. & Seyfarth, R. M. 2000. Proximate factors mediating "contact" calls in adult female baboons (Papio cynocephalus ursinus) and their infants. Journal of Comparative Psychology, 114, 36-46.
53. Robinson, J. G. 1979. An analysis of the organization of vocal communication in the titi monkey Callicebus moloch. Zeitschrift für Tierpsychologie, 49, 381-405.
54. Rosenthal, R. & Rosnow, R. L. 1991. Essentials of Behavioral Research: Methods and Data Analysis. New York: McGraw-Hill Publishing.
55. Ryan, M. J. & Rand, A. S. 1990. The sensory basis of sexual selection for complex calls in the Tungara frog, Physalaemus pustulosus (sexual selection for sensory exploitation). Evolution, 44, 305-314.
56. Ryan, M. J. & Rand, A. S. 1993. Species recognition and sexual selection as a unitary problem in animal communication. Evolution, 47, 647-657.
57. Ryan, M. J. & Wilczynski, W. 1988. Coevolution of sender and receiver: effect on local mate preferences in cricket frogs. Science, 240, 1786-1788.
58. Searcy, W. A. & Marler, P. 1981. A test for responsiveness to song structure and programming in female sparrows. Science, 213, 926-928.
59. Snowdon, C. T., Cleveland, J. & French, J. A. 1983. Responses to context- and individual-specific cues in cotton-top tamarin long calls. Animal Behaviour, 31, 92-101.
60. Sugiura, H. 1998. Matching of acoustic features during the vocal exchange of coo calls by Japanese macaques. Animal Behaviour, 55, 673-687.
61. Waser, P. M. 1977. Individual recognition, intragroup cohesion, and intergroup spacing: evidence from sound playback to forest monkeys. Behaviour, 60, 28-74.
62. Waser, P. M. 1982. The evolution of male loud calls among mangabeys and baboons. In: Primate Communication (Ed. by C. T. Snowdon, C. H. Brown & M. R. Peterson), pp. 177-143. New York: Cambridge University Press.
63. Weiss, D. J. & Hauser, M. D. 2002. Perception of harmonics in the combination long call of cottontop tamarins, Saguinus oedipus. Animal Behaviour, 64 (2002) U27.
64. Weiss, D. J., Garibaldi, B. T. & Hauser, M. D. 2001. The production and perception of long calls in cotton-top tamarins (Saguinus oedipus): acoustic analyses and playback experiments. Journal of Comparative Psychology, 115, 258-271.
65. Zoloth, S. R., Petersen, M. R., Beecher, M. D., Green, S., Marler, P., Moody, D. B. & Stebbins, W. 1979. Species-specific perceptual processing of vocal sounds by monkeys. Science, 204, 870-873.