Suitable microscope objectives for multiphoton digital imaging

Proceedings of SPIE - The International Society for Optical Engineering

Volumn 4620, Issue , 2002, Pages 36-47

  Benham, Gerald S ^a   Schwartz, Stanley ^a  

^a Nikon USA   (United States)

Author keywords

Multiphoton; Objectives; Spectral transmission data; Spherical aberration; Water lenses

Indexed keywords

ABERRATIONS; IMAGE ANALYSIS; INFRARED RADIATION; LIGHT TRANSMISSION; MULTIPHOTON PROCESSES; OPTICAL INSTRUMENT LENSES; OPTICAL MICROSCOPY; SPECTRUM ANALYSIS; TISSUE;

MULTIPHOTON DIGITAL IMAGING;

IMAGING TECHNIQUES;

EID: 0036400217     PISSN: 0277786X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: 10.1117/12.470673     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (36)

1. Amos, W.B., White, J.G., and Fordam, M. (1987). Use of confocal imaging in the study of biological structures. Appl. Ops. 26, 3239-3243.
2. nd Edition." (B. Matsumoto, Ed) Chapter 3. Academic Press, San Diego.
3. Bliton, A.C. and Lechleiter, J.D. (1995). Optical considerations at ultraviolet wavelengths in confocal microscopy. In "Handbook of Biological Confocal Microscopy" (J.B. Pawley, Ed), Second Edition. pp. 431-444. Plenum Press, New York and London.
4. Brakenhoff, G.J., van der Voort, H.T.M., van Spronsen, E.A., and Nanninga, N. (1989). Three-dimensional imaging in fluorescence by confocal scanning microscopy. J. Microscopy 153, 151-159.
5. Brenner, M. (1999). Nikon water immersion objectives. Invited Presentation. M.S.A., Annual Meeting, Portland, Oregon.
6. Denk, W. (2000). Principles of multiphoton-excitation fluorescence microscopy. In "Imaging Neurons - A Laboratory Manual" (R. Yuste, F. Lanni, and A. Konnerth, Eds.), pp. 17.1-8. Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press, Cold Spring Harbor.
7. Denk, W., Piston, D.W., and Webb, W.W. (1995). Two-photon molecular excitation in laser-scanning microscopy. In "Handbook of Biological Confocal Microscopy" (J.B. Pawley, Ed), Revised Edition. pp. 445-458. Plenum Press, New York and London.
8. Denk, W., Strickler, J.H., and Webb, W.W. (1990). Two-photon laser scanning fluorescence microscopy. Science 248, 73-76.
9. Diaspro, A. (2000). Personal Communication. Department of Physics. University of Genoa. Genoa, Italy.
10. Diaspro, A., Annunziata, S., Raimondo, M., and Robello, M. (1999a). Three-dimensional optical behaviour of a confocal microscope with single illumination and detection pinhole through imaging of subresolution beads. Microscopy Research and Technique 45, 130-131.
11. Diaspro, A., Corosu, M., Ramoino, P., and Robello, M. (1999b). Adapting a compact confocal microscope system to a two-photon excitation fluorescence imaging architecture. Microscopy Research and Technique 47, 196-205.
12. Dixon, A.J., and Benham, G.S. (1987). Applications of the confocal scanning fluorescence microscope - in biomedical research. American Biotechnology Laboratory 5, 20-25.
13. Dunn, K., and Maxfield, F.R. (1998). Ratio imaging instrumentation. In "Video Microscopy" (G. Sluder and D.E. Wolf, Eds) pp. 217-236. Academic Press, San Diego.
14. Dunn, K.D., and Wang, E. (2000). Optical aberrations and objective choice in multicolor confocal microscopy. BioTechniques 28, 542-550.
15. Fine, A. (2000). Confocal microscopy; principles and practice. In "Imaging Neurons - A Laboratory Manual" (R. Yuste, F. Lanni, and A. Konnerth, Eds.), pp. 11.1-11. Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press, Cold Spring Harbor.
16. Hale, I.L., and Matsumoto, B. (1993). Resolution of subcellular detail in thick tissue sections: immunohistochemical preparation and fluorescence confocal microscopy. In "Cell Biological Applications of Confocal Microscopy" (B. Matsumoto, Ed) pp. 289-324. Academic Press, San Diego.
17. Hell, S., Reiner, G., Cremer, C., and Stelzer, E.H.K. (1991). Aberrations in confocal fluorescence microscopy induced by mismatches in refractive index. J. Microscopy 169, 391-405.
18. Inoue, S. (1989). Imaging of unresolved objects, superresolution, and precision of distance measurement, with video microscopy. In "Fluorescence Microscopy of Living Cells in Culture, Part B: Quantitative Fluorescence Microscopy - Imaging and Spectroscopy" (D.L. Taylor and Y.-L. Wang, Eds) pp. 85-112. Academic Press, San Diego.
19. Keller H.E. (1995). Objective lenses for confocal microscopy. In "Handbook of Biological Confocal Microscopy" (J.B. Pawley, Ed), Second Edition. pp. 111-126. Plenum Press, New York and London.
20. Larson, J. (1999). Understanding optical and digital resolution. Technical Bulletin. Nikon Science and Technologies Group. Melville. 6 pp.
21. Lemasters, J.J. (2000). Two-photon excitation. In "Light Microscopy for the Biomedical Sciences" (J.J. Lemasters, K. Jacobson, and E.D. Salmon, Eds.) pp. L15-L22. Carolina Workshops, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill.
22. Matsumoto, B. and Kramer, T. (1994). Theory and applications of confocal microscopy. Cell Vision 1, 190-198.
23. Mohler, W.A., and Squirrell, J.M. (2000). Multiphoton imaging of embryonic development. In "Imaging Neurons - A Laboratory Manual" (R. Yuste, F. Lanni, and A. Konnerth, Eds.), pp. 21.1-11. Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press, Cold Spring Harbor.
24. Nikon Corporation. (1999). "Microscope components for transmitted light applications." Printed in Japan (9905-03)T.
25. Okugawa, H. (2001). Personal Communication. Optical Design Department. Nikon Corporation. Ofuna, Japan.
26. Paddock, S.W. (1999). Confocal laser scanning microscopy. BioTechniques 27, 992-1002.
27. Periasamy, A., Skoglund, P., Noakes, C., and Keller, R. (1999). An evaluation of two-photon excitation versus confocal and digital deconvolution fluorescence microscopy imaging in Xenopus morphogenesis. Microscopy Research and Technique 47, 172-181.
28. Potter, S.M. (2000). Two-photon microscopy for 4D imaging of living neurons. In "Imaging Neurons - A Laboratory Manual" (R. Yuste, F. Lanni, and A. Konnerth, Eds.), pp. 20.1-16. Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press, Cold Spring Harbor.
29. Schwartz, S., Brenner, M., and Benham, G.S. (1996). Confocal imaging for the individual researcher: acquiring the tools in a competitive funding environment. American Laboratory.
30. Scott, M.L. (1992). Choosing optics for confocal microscopy. American Laboratory, 32-38.
31. Shaw, P.J., and Rawlins, D.J. (1991). The point-spread function of a confocal microscope: its measurement and use in deconvolution of 3-D data. J. Microscopy. 163, 151-165.
32. Smallcombe, A., and Benham, G.S. (1993). Effective laser lines for biological confocal microscopy. In "Multidimentional Microscopy." (P.C. Cheng et al. Ed). pp. 267-290. Springer-Verlag, New York.
33. White, J.G., Amos, W.B., and Fordham, M. (1987). An evaluation of confocal versus convential imaging of biological structures by fluorescence light microscopy. J. Cell Biology 105, 41-48.
34. Wise, F.W. (2000). Lasers for multiphoton microscopy. In "Imaging Neurons - A Laboratory Manual" (R. Yuste, F. Lanni, and A. Konnerth, Eds.), pp. 18.1-9. Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press, Cold Spring Harbor.
35. Wokosin, D. (2002). Personal Communication. Centre for Biophotonics. Strathclyde University.
36. Xu, C. (2000). Two-photon cross sections of indicators. In "Imaging Neurons - A Laboratory Manual" (R. Yuste, F. Lanni, and A. Konnerth, Eds.), pp. 19.1-9. Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press, Cold Spring Harbor.