How to communicate risks?;Wie kommuniziert man risiken?

Fortschritt und Fortbildung in der Medizin

Volumn 26, Issue , 2002, Pages 13-22

  Gigerenzer, Gerd ^a  

^a NONE

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ALGORITHM; CANCER RISK; CONFERENCE PAPER; DOCTOR PATIENT RELATION; GENETIC RISK; HIGH RISK POPULATION; HUMAN; MEDICAL DECISION MAKING; MEDICAL PRACTICE; PATIENT COUNSELING; RISK ASSESSMENT;

EID: 0036399048     PISSN: 01703331     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (17)

1. Gigerenzer, G. (1996). The Psychology of good judgment: Frequency formats and simple algorithms. Medical Decision Making, 16, 273-280
2. Gigerenzer, G. (2001). Der unmündige Patient. Kursbuch, 145, 132-144
3. Gigerenzer. G. (2002). Das Einmaleins der Skepsis: Über den richtigen Umgang mit Zahlen und Risiken. Berlin: Berlin Verlag
4. Gigerenzer, G., & Hoffrage, U. (1995). How to improve Bayesian reasoning without instruction: Frequency formats. Psychological Review, 102, 684-704
5. Gigerenzer. G., & Hoffrage, U., & Ebert, A. (1998). AIDS counseling for low-risk clients. AIDS CARE, 10, 197-211
6. Hoffrage, U., & Gigerenzer, G. (1998). Using natural frequencies to improve diagnostic inferences. Academic Medicine, 73, 538-540.
7. Hoffrage, U., Lindsey, S., Hertwig, R., & Gigerenzer, G. (2000). Communicating statistical information. Science, 290, 2261-2262
8. Kerlikowske, K., Grady, D., Barclay, J., Sickles, E.A., Ernster, V. (1996). "Effect of age., breast density, and family history on the sensitivity of first screening mammography". Journal of the American Medical Association 276, S. 33-38
9. Koehler. J. J., Chia, A., & Lindsey, S. (1995). The random match probability (RMP) in DNA evidence: Irrelevant and prejudicial? Jurimetrics Journal. 35, 201-219
10. Kurzenhäuser, S. (2002). Brustkrebs-Screening: Welche Information tiber Risiken und Nutzen vermitteln deutsche Gesundheitsbroschüren? Manuskript. Max-Planck-Institut für Bildungsforschung. Berlin
11. Mühlhauser, I., & Ilöldke. B. (1999). Übersicht: Mammographie-Screening. Darstellung der wissenschaftlichen Evidenz-Grundlage zur Kommunikation mit der Frau. Sonderbeilage Arzneitelegramm. 10/99, 101-108
12. Nyström, L., Larsson, I.G., Wall, S., Rutqvist, L., Andersson, I., Bjurstam, N., Fagerberg, G., Frisell, J., & Tabár, I., (1996). An overview of the Swedish randomised mammography trials: Total mortality pattern and the representativity of the study cohorts. Journal of Medical Screening, 3, 85-87
13. Sedlmeier, P., & Gigerenzer, G. (2001). Teaching Bayesian reasoning in less than two hours. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General. 130, 380-400
14. Slaytor, E. K., & Ward. J. E. (1998). How risks of breast cancer and benefits of screening are communicated to women: Analysis of 58 pamphlets. British Medical Journal, 317, 263-264
15. Slovic, P., & Monahan, J. (1995). Probability, danger, and coercion: A study of risk perception and decision making in mental health law. Law and human Behavior, 19, 49-65
16. Slovic, P., Monahan, J., & MacGregor, D. G. (2000). Violence risk assessment and risk communication: The effects of using actual cases, providing instruction, and employing probability versus frequency formats. Law and Human Behavior, 24, 271-296
17. Stine, G. J. (1999). AIDS update 1999: An annual overview of acquired immune deficiency syndrome. Upper Saddle River. NJ: Prentice-Hall. Inc.