Abundance-range size relationships in stream vegetation in Denmark

Plant Ecology

Volumn 161, Issue 2, 2002, Pages 175-183

  Riis, Tenna ^a   Sand Jensen, Kaj ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF COPENHAGEN   (Denmark)

Author keywords

Abundance range size; Habitat destruction; Metapopulation dynamics; Stream vegetation

Indexed keywords

ABUNDANCE; AQUATIC PLANT; METAPOPULATION; POPULATION DYNAMICS; SIZE DISTRIBUTION;

DENMARK;

EID: 0036397792     PISSN: 13850237     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1023/A:1020332216772     Document Type: Article

References (37)

1. Baagøe J. and Ravn F.K. 1896. Excursionen til jydske søer og vandløb i sommeren 1895 (in Danish). Botanisk Tidsskrift 20: 288-326.
2. Barrat-Segretain M.H. 1996. Strategies of reproduction, dispersion and competition in river plants: a review. Vegetatio 123: 13-37.
3. Barrat-Segretain M.H. 1998. Comparative abilities of vegetative regeneration among aquatic plants growing in disturbed habitats. Aquatic Botany 60: 201-211.
4. Brown J.H. 1984. On the relationship between abundance and distribution of species. American Naturalist 124: 255-279.
5. Brown J.H. 1995. Macroecology. The University of Chicago Press.
6. Cook C.D.K. 1987. Dispersion in aquatic and amphibious vascular plants. In: Crawford R.M.M. (ed.), Plant Life in Aquatic and Amphibious Habitats. Blackwell Scientific Publications, pp. 179-190.
7. Gaston K.J. 1994. Rarity. Chapman & Hall, London.
8. Gaston K. and Lawton J.H. 1990. Effects of scale and habitat on the relationship between regional distribution and local abundance. Oikos 58: 329-335.
9. Gaston K., Blackburn T.M. and Lawton J.H. 1997. Interspecific abundance-range size relationships, an appraisal of mechanisms. Journal of Animal Ecology 66: 579-601.
10. Gaston K. and Curnutt J.L. 1998. The dynamics of abundance-range size relationships. Oikos 81: 38-44.
11. Gaston K.J., Blackburn T.M., Gregory R.D. and Greenwood J.D. 1998. The anatomy of the interspecific abundance-range size relationship for the British avifauna: I. Spatial patterns. Ecology Letters 1: 38-46.
12. Gaston K.J. and Blackburn T.M. 1999. A critique for macroecology. Oikos 84: 353-368.
13. Gyllenberg M. and Hanski I. 1992. Single-species metapopulation dynamics: A structured model. Theoretical Population Biology 42: 35-66.
14. Hanski I. 1982. Dynamics of regional distribution: the core and satellite species hypothesis. Oikos 38: 210-221.
15. Hanski I. 1991. Single-species metapopulation dynamics: concepts, models and observations. Biological Journal of Linnean Society 42: 17-38.
16. Hanski I., Kouki J. and Halkka A. 1993. Three explanations of the positive relationship between distribution and abundance of species. In: Ricklefs R.E. and Schluter D. (eds), Species Diversity in Ecological Communities. Historical and Geographical Perspectives. The University of Chigago Press, Chicago, pp. 108-116.
17. Harvey P.H. and Pagel M.D. 1991. The Comparative Method in Evolutionary Biology. Oxford University Press, Oxford.
18. Henry C.P. and Amoros C. 1996. Are the banks a source of recolonization after disturbance: an experiment on aquatic vegetation in a former channel of the Rhône River. Hydrobiologia 330: 151-162.
19. Holmes N.TH., Boon P.J. and Rowell T.A. 1998. A revised classification system for British rivers based on their aquatic plant communities. Aquatic Conservation 8: 555-578.
20. Holt R.D., Lawton J.H. and Gaston K.J. 1997. On the relationship between range size and local abundance: back to basis. Oikos 78: 183-190.
21. Hynes H.B.N. 1970. The Ecology of Running Waters. Liverpool University Press, Liverpool.
22. Jansson R., Nilsson C. and Renöfält B. 2000. Fragmentation of riparian floras in rivers with multiple dams. Ecology 81: 899-903.
23. Johansson M.E. and Nilsson C. 1993. Hydrochory, population dynamics and distribution of the clonal aquatic plant Ranunculus lingua. Journal of Ecology 81: 81-91.
24. Macpherson E. 1989. Influence of geographical distribution, body size and diet on population density of benthic fishes of Namibia (South West Africa). Marine Ecological Progress Series 50: 295-299.
25. Moeslund B., Løjtnant B., Mathiessen H., Mathiessen L., Pedersen A., Thyssen N. et al. 1990. Danske Vandplanter (in Danish). Environmental News No. 2. Danish Environmental Protection Agency, Copenhagen.
26. Nee S., Gregory R.D. and May R.M. 1991. Core and satellite species: theory and artefacts. Oikos 62: 83-89.
27. Pedersen A. 1976. Najadeaceernes, Potamogetonaceernes, Ruppiaceernes, Zannichelliaceernes og Zosteraceernes udbredelse i Danmark (in Danish). Botanisk Tidsskrift 70: 203-262.
28. Preston C.D. and Croft J.M. 1997. Aquatic Plants in Britain and Ireland. Harley Books, London.
29. Rapoport E.H., Borioli G., Monjeau J.A., Puntieri J.E. and Oviedo R.D. 1986. The design of nature reserves: A simulation trial for assesseing specific conservation value. Biological Conservation 37: 269-290.
30. Raunkiær C. 1899. De danske blomsterplanters naturhistorie. Enkimbladede (in Danish). Gyldendal, Copenhagen.
31. Riis T. and Sand-Jensen K. 2001. Historical changes in species composition and richness accompanying perturbation and eutrophication of Danish lowland streams over 100 years. Freshwater Biol. 46: 269-280.
32. Riis T., Sand-Jensen K. and Vestergaard O. 2000. Plant communities in lowland streams: species composition and environmental factors. Aquatic Botany 66: 255-272.
33. Sand-Jensen K., Pedersen M.F. and Nielsen S.L. 1992. Photosynthetic use of inorganic carbon among primary and secondary water plants in streams. Fresbwater Biology 27: 283-293.
34. Sand-Jensen K., Andersen K. and Andersen T. 1999. Dynamic properties of recruitment, expansion and mortality of macrophyte patches in streams. International Revue Hydrobiologie 84: 497-508.
35. Sculthorpe C.D. 1967. The Biology of Aquatic Vascular Plants. Edward Arnold, London.
36. Thompson K. and Hodgson J.G. 1996. More on the biogeography of scarce vascular plants. Biological Conservation 75: 299-302.
37. Thompson K., Hodgson J.G. and Gaston K.J. 1998. Abundance-range size relationships in the herbaceous flora of central England. Journal of Ecology 86: 439-448.