Two-phase study to assess the number of cases based on claims databases: Characteristics of the validation data set

Methods of Information in Medicine

Volumn 41, Issue 4, 2002, Pages 349-356

  Couris, Chantal M ^a   Rabilloud, M ^a   Colin, C ^a   Ecochard, R ^a  

^a HOSPICES CIVILS DE LYON   (France)

Author keywords

Epidemiology; Incidence; Medical informatics applications; Sensitivity and specificity; Statistics

Indexed keywords

ACCURACY; ARTICLE; DATA BASE; HOSPITALIZATION; MEDICAL INFORMATICS; MORBIDITY; PREVALENCE; PRIORITY JOURNAL; VALIDATION PROCESS;

EID: 0036394634     PISSN: 00261270     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1055/s-0038-1634393     Document Type: Article

References (16)

1. Connell FA, Diehr P, Hart LG. The use of large data bases in health care studies. Annu Rev Public Health 1987; 8: 51-74.
2. Dussaucy A, Viel JF, Mulin B, Euvrard J. The framework Prospective Payment Information Systems: bias, sources of errors and consequences. Rev Epidemiol Sante Publique 1994; 42 (4): 345-58.
3. Fourquet F, Demont F. Utilisation du PMSI en épidémiologie. Technologie Santé 1999; 39: 55-64.
4. Greenland S, Robins JM. Confounding and misclassification. Am J Epidemiol 1985; 122 (3): 495-506.
5. Lombrail P, Minvielle E, Comar L, Gottot S. Prospective Payment Information Systems and epidemiology: a difficult link to establish. Rev Epidemiol Sante Publique 1994; 42 (4): 334-44.
6. Solin LJ, Legorreta A, Schultz DJ, Levin HA, Zatz S, Goodman RL. Analysis of a claims database for the identification of patients with carcinoma of the breast. J Med Syst 1994; 18 (1):23-32.
7. Cooper GS, Yuan Z, Stange KC, Dennis LK, Amini SB, Rimm AA. The sensitivity of Medicare claims data for case ascertainment of six common cancers. Med Care 1999; 37 (5): 436-44.
8. Warren JL, Feuer E, Potosky AL, Riley GF. Lynch CF. Use of Medicare hospital and physician data to assess breast cancer incidence. Med Care 1999; 37 (5): 445-56.
9. Fisher ES, Baron JA, Malenka DJ, Barrett J, Bubolz TA. Overcoming potential pitfalls in the use of Medicare data for epidemiologic research. Am J Public Health 1990; 80 (12): 1487-90.
10. Quam L, Ellis LB, Venus P, Clouse J, Taylor CG, Leatherman S. Using claims data for epidemiologic research. The concordance of claims-based criteria with the medical record and patient survey for identifying a hypertensive population. Med Care 1993; 31 (6): 498-507.
11. Bashir SA, Duffy SW. The correction of risk estimates for measurement error. Ann Epidemiol 1997; 7 (2): 154-64.
12. Carroll RJ, Ruppert D, Stefanski LA. Measurement error in nonlinear models. London: Chapman & Hall, 1995.
13. Borella L, Peuvrel P, Sauvage M, Maraninchi D, Philip T. A study based on national DRG data to evaluate work load and practice relating to cancer patients in not-for-profit hospitals. Rev Epidemiol Sante Publique 2000; 48 (1): 53-70.
14. Direction générale de la santé, Direction des Hôpitaux. Circulaire DGS/DH/AFS n°98-213 du 24 mars 1998 relative à l'organisation des soins en cancérologie dans les établissements d'hospitalisation publics et privés.
15. Gao S, Hui SL, Hall KS, Hendrie HC. Estimating disease prevalence from two-phase surveys with non-response at the second phase. Stat Med 2000; 19 (16): 2101-14.
16. Couris CM, Colin C, Rabilloud M, Schott A, Ecochard R. Method of correction to assess the number of hospitalized incident breast cancer cases based on claims databases. J Clin Epidemiol 2002; 55 (4): 386-91.