Fracture behaviour of mis-matched dissimilar welds: Numerical simulation using local approach

American Society of Mechanical Engineers, Pressure Vessels and Piping Division (Publication) PVP

Volumn 434, Issue , 2002, Pages 11-16

  Madi, Yazid ^a   Besson, Jacques ^a   Martin, Grégoire ^a   Hornet, Patrick ^a   Koçak, Mustafa ^a  

^a PSL RESEARCH UNIVERSITY   (France)

Author keywords

Ductile fracture; Finite Element simulation; Mismatch effect; Rousselier Model; Welded joints

Indexed keywords

NUCLEAR PRESSURE VESSELS;

AUSTENITE; COMPUTER SIMULATION; CRACKS; DISSIMILAR METALS; DUCTILE FRACTURE; FERRITE; FINITE ELEMENT METHOD; FRACTURE MECHANICS; NOTCHED BAR TENSILE TESTING; PRESSURE VESSELS;

WELDS;

EID: 0036386225     PISSN: 0277027X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: 10.1115/PVP2002-1100     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (12)

1. Besson, J., Foerch, R., 1997. Large scale object-oriented finite element code design. Computer Methods in Applied Mechanics and Engineering 142, 165-187.
2. Besson, J., Steglich, D., Brocks, W., 2001. Modeling of crack growth in round bars and plane strain specimens. Int. J. Solids Structures 38 (46-47), 8259-8284.
3. Franklin, A. G., 1969. Comparison between a quantitative microscope and chemical methods for assessment of non-metallic inclusions. J. of The Iron and Steel Institute Feb., 181-186.
4. Geney, C., 1998. Etude expérimentale et modélisation par approche locale de la rupture ductile de trois aciers inoxydables austénitiques et d'un acier 16mnd5. Ph.D. thesis, Université des Sciences et Technologies de Lille.
5. Liu, Y., Murakami, S., Kanagawa, Y., 1994. Mesh-dependence and stress singularity in finite element analysis of creep crack growth by continuum damage mechanics approach. Eur. J. Mech, A/Solids 13 (3), 395-417.
6. Martin, G., al., 2002. Fracture behaviour of mis-matched dissimilar welds: Experimental results. In: PVP 2002. ASME.
7. Pineau, A., 1992. Global and local approaches to fracture - Transferability of laboratory test results to components. In: Argon, A. (Ed.), Topics in Fracture and Fatigue. Springer Verlag Inc., NY.
8. Rivalin, F., Besson, J., Di Fant, M., Pineau, A., 2001. Ductile tearing of pipeline-steel wide plates - II.: Modeling of in-plane crack propagation. Engng Fracture Mechanics 68 (3), 347-364.
9. Rousselier, G., 1987. Ductile fracture models and their potential in local approach of fracture. Nuclear Engineering and Design 105, 97-111.
10. Schmitt, W., Sun, D., Blauel, J., 1997. Recent advances in the application of the Gurson model to the evaluation of ductile fracture thoughness. In: Recent advances in fracture. TMS.
11. Simo, J., Taylor, R., 1985. Consistent tangent operators for rate-independent elastoplasticity. Computer Methods in Applied Mechanics and Engineering 48, 101-118.
12. Xia, L., Shih, C., Hutchinson, J., 1995. A computational approach to ductile crack growth under large scale yielding conditions. J. Mech. Phys. Solids 43 (3), 389-413.