Eliciting and valuing market preferences with traditional food crops: The case of chickpea in India

International Food and Agribusiness Management Review

Volumn 5, Issue 1, 2002, Pages 7-21

  Agbola, Frank W ^a   Kelley, Timothy G ^b   Bent, Martin J ^c   Parthasarathy Rao, P ^d  

^a MONASH UNIVERSITY   (Australia)

^b FOOD AND AGRICULTURE ORGANIZATION OF THE UNITED NATIONS   (Italy)

^c CURTIN UNIVERSITY   (Australia)

^d INTERNATIONAL CROPS RESEARCH INSTITUTE FOR THE SEMI ARID TROPICS ICRISAT   (India)

Author keywords

Chickpea; Consumer preferences; India; Quality characteristics

Indexed keywords

CICER ARIETINUM;

EID: 0036384330     PISSN: 15592448     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/S1096-7508(02)00110-6     Document Type: Article

References (16)

1. Agbola, F. W., Bent, M.J.M., Rao, P.P., & Kelley, T.G. (2000). Factors influencing the demand for chickpea in India: Implications for marketing and promotion in the Indian chickpea market. Proceedings of the 43rd Conference of Australian Agricultural and Resource Economics Society, Sydney, January 23-25.
2. AGLC. (1991). Market research visit to India, Bahrain, Dubai, Iran, Turkey, Italy, Sri-Lanka and the United States in September/October. Australian Grains Legumes Committee.
3. Ahmadi-Estafani, F.Z., & Stanmore, R.G. (1994). Values of Australian wheat and flour quality characteristics. Agribusiness, 10, 529-536.
4. Davidson, R., & MacKinnon, G. (1981). Several tests of model specification in the presence of alternative hypotheses. Econometirca, 49, 781-793.
5. Espinosa, J.A., & Goodwin, B.K. (1982). Hedonic price estimation for Kansas wheat characteristics. Western Journal of Agricultural Economics, 7, 293-299.
6. Gulati, A., & Kelley, T.G. (1999). Trade liberalisation and Indian agriculture: Cropping pattern changes and efficiency gains in semi-arid tropics (p. 296). Oxford University Press: New Delhi, India.
7. Gulati, A., Sharma, A., & Kohli, D.S. (1996, 30 March). Self-sufficiency and allocative efficiency-the case of edible oils. Economic and Political Weekly.
8. ICRISAT. (1991). Laboratory Manual. Crops Quality Unit, ICRISAT: Hyderabad.
9. Kelley, T.G. (1999). The fundamentals of the Indian sub-continent pulse economy: Long-term implications of the Australian pulse industry. GRDC Project No. VF35 A.
10. Kelley, T.G. Parthasarathy Rao, P., & Grisko-Kelley, H. (2000). The pulse economy in the mid-1990s: A review of global and regional developments. In R. Knight (Ed.), Linking research and marketing opportunities for pulses in the 21st century (pp. 1-30). CABI.
11. Rosen, S. (1974). Hedonic prices and implicit markets: Product differentiation in pure competition. Journal of Political Economy, 82, 34-55.
12. Samikwa, D.D., Brorsen, B. W. & Sanders, L. D. (1998). Hedonic prices of Malawi burley tobacco. International Food and Agribusiness Management Review, 1, 107-117.
13. Siddique, K. H. M. (1998). Summary of overseas travel to New Delhi, India, 29 August-4 September 1998, unpublished.
14. Siddique, K. H. M. & Sykes, J. (1997). Pulse production in Australia: Past, present and future. Australian Journal of Experimental Agriculture, 37, 103-111.
15. Sheppard, S. (1997). Hedonic analysis of housing markets. Department of Economics, Oberlin College: Mimeo.
16. Wahl, T. I., Shi, H., & Mittelhammer, R. C. (1995). A Hedonic price analysis of quality characteristics of Japanese wagyu beef. Agribusiness, 11, 35-44.