Insights into the quantitative relationship between sensitization and challenge for allergic contact dermatitis reactions

Toxicology and Applied Pharmacology

Volumn 183, Issue 1, 2002, Pages 66-70

  Scott, Aaron E ^a   Kashon, Michael L ^a   Yucesoy, Berran ^a   Luster, Michael I ^a   Tinkle, Sally S ^a  

^a NATIONAL INSTITUTE FOR OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY AND HEALTH   (United States)

Author keywords

Allergic contact dermatitis and risk assessment; Local lymph node assay and modeling

Indexed keywords

1 CHLORO 2,4 DINITROBENZENE; SQUARIC ACID DIBUTYL ESTER;

ANIMAL EXPERIMENT; ANIMAL MODEL; ANIMAL TISSUE; ARTICLE; CONTROLLED STUDY; DOSE RESPONSE; EXPOSURE; FEMALE; LOCAL LYMPH NODE ASSAY; MOUSE; NONHUMAN; PROVOCATION TEST; QUANTITATIVE ANALYSIS; RISK ASSESSMENT; SAFETY; SENSITIZATION; SKIN ALLERGY; TOXICITY TESTING;

ANIMALIA; CAVIA PORCELLUS; SUS SCROFA;

EID: 0036382604     PISSN: 0041008X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1006/taap.2002.9469     Document Type: Article

References (25)

1. Basketter, D. A., Gerberick, G. F., Kimber, I., and Loveless, S. E. (1999). Toxicology of Contact Dermatitis: Allergy, Irritancy and Urticaria. Wiley & Sons, Chichester.
2. Bronaugh, R. L., Roberts, C. D., and McCoy, J. L. (1994). Dose-response relationship in skin sensitization. Food Chem. Toxicol. 32, 113-117.
3. Carpenter, J., and Bithell, J. (2000). Bootstrap confidence intervals: When, which, what? A practical guide for medical statisticians. Stat. Med. 19, 1141-1164.
4. Chan, P. K., Baldwin, R. C., Parsons, B. S., Moss, J. N., Stiratelli, R., Smith, J. M., and Hayes, W. (1983). Kathon boicide: Manifestation of delayed contact dermatitis in guinea pigs is dependent on the concentration for induction and challenge. J. Invest. Dermatol. 81, 409-411.
5. Friedmann, P. S. (1994). Clinical Aspects of Allergic Contact Dermatitis. In Immunotoxicology and Immunopharmacology (Dean, J. H., Luster, M. I., Munson, A. E., and Kimber, I., Eds.), pp. 589-616. Raven Press, New York.
6. Friedmann, P. S., Rees, J., White, S. I., and Matthews, J. N. S. (1990). Low-dose exposure to antigen induces sub-clinical sensitization. Clin. Exp. Immunol. 81, 507-509.
7. Funk, J. O., and Maibach, H. I. (1994). Propylene glycol dermatitis: Reevaluation of an old problem. Contact Dermatitis 31, 236-241.
8. Gerberick, G. F., Robinson, M. K., Ryan, C. A., Dearman, R. J., Kimber, I., Basketter, D. A., Wright, Z., and Marks, J. G. (2001). Contact allergenic potency: Correlation of human and local lymph node assay data. Am. J. Contact Dermatitis 12, 156-261.
9. Hannuksela, M., and Salo, H. (1986). The repeated open application test (ROAT). Contact Dermatitis 14, 221-227.
10. Heylings, J. R., Clowes, H. M., Cumberbatch, M., Dearman, R. J., Fielding, I., Hilton, J., and Kimber, I. (1996). Sensitization to 2,4-dinitrochlorobenzene: Influence of vehicle on absorption and lymph node activation. Toxicology 109, 57-65.
11. Johansen, J. D., Bruze, M., Andersen, K. E., Frosch, P. J., Dreier, B., White, I. R., Rastogi, S., Lepoittevin, J. P., and Menne, T. (1998). The repeated open application test: Suggestions for a scale of evaluation. Contact Dermatitis 39, 95-96.
12. Kimber, I., Gerberick, G. F., and Basketter, D. A. (1999). Thresholds in contact sensitization: Theoretical and practical considerations. Food Chem. Toxicol. 37, 553-560.
13. Kimber, I., and Weisenberger, C. (1989). A murine local lymph node assay for identification of contact allergens: Assay development and results of an initial validation study. Arch. Toxicol. 63, 274-282.
14. Kimber, I., and Weisenberger, C. (1991). Anamnestic responses to contact allergens: Application in the murine local lymph node assay. J. Appl. Toxicol. 11, 129-133.
15. Kligman, A. M. (1966). The identification of contact allergens by human assay. 3. The maximization test: A procedure for screening and rating contact sensitizers. J. Invest. Dermatol. 47, 393-409.
16. Landersen, K. E., Johansen, J. D., Bruze, M., Frosch, P. J., Goossens, A., Lepoittevin, J. P., Rastogi, S., White, I., and Menne, T. (2001). The time-dose-response relationship for elicitation of contact dermatitis in isoeugenol allergic individuals. Toxicol. Appl. Pharmacol. 170, 166-171.
17. Loveless, S. E., Ladics, G. S., Gerberick, F., Ryan, C. A., Basketter, D. A., Scholes, E. W., House, R. V., Hilton, J., Dearman, R. J., and Kimber, I. (1996). Further evaluation of the local lymph node assay in the final phase of an international collaborative trial. Toxicology 108, 141-152.
18. Lushniak, B. D. (1995). Epidemiology of occupational contact dermatitis. Dermatol. Clin. 13, 671-680.
19. McFadden, J. P., Wakelin, S. H., Holloway, D. B., and Basketter, D. A. (1998). The effect of patch duration on the elicitation of paraphenylenediamine contact allergy. Contact Dermatitis 39, 79-81.
20. Robinson, M. K., and Cruze, C. A. (1996). Preclinical skin sensitization testing of antihistamines: Guinea pig and local lymph node assay responses. Food Chem. Toxicol. 34, 495-506.
21. Robinson, M. K., Gerberick, G. F., Ryan, C. A., McNamee, P., White, I. R., and Basketter, D. A. (2000). The importance of exposure estimation in the assessment of skin sensitization risk. Contact Dermatitis 42, 251-259.
22. Robinson, M. K., Parsell, K. W., Breneman, D. L., and Cruze, C. A. (1991). Evaluation of the primary skin irritation and allergic contact sensitization potential of transdermal triprolidine. Fundam. Appl. Toxicol. 17, 103-119.
23. Scholes, E. W., Basketter, D. A., Sarll, A. E., Kimber, I., Evans, C. D., Miller, K., Robbins, M. C., Harrison, P. T., and Waite, S. J. (1992). The local lymph node assay: Results of a final interlaboratory validation under field conditions. J. Appl. Toxicol. 12, 217-222.
24. Slob, W. (1999). Deriving safe exposure levels for chemicals from animal studies using statistical methods: Recent developments. In Statistics for the Environment 4: Pollution Assessment and Control (Barnett, V., Stein, A., and Turkman, K. F., Eds.), pp. 153-174. Wiley, New York.
25. van Och, F. M. M., Slob, W., de Jong, W. H., Vandebriel, R. J., and van Loveren, H. (2000). A quantitative method for assessing the sensitizing potency of low molecular weight chemicals using a local lymph node assay: Employment of a regression method that includes determination of the uncertainty margins. Toxicology 146, 49-59.