Triple test cross analysis for some morphological traits in mungbean (Vigna radiata (L.) Wilczek)

Euphytica

Volumn 126, Issue 3, 2002, Pages 413-420

  Khattak, G S S ^a   Haq, M A ^b   Ashraf, M ^c   Tahir, G R ^b  

^a THE UNIVERSITY OF AGRICULTURE   (Pakistan)

^b NUCLEAR INSTITUTE FOR AGRICULTURE AND BIOLOGY NIAB   (Pakistan)

^c UNIVERSITY OF AGRICULTURE   (Pakistan)

Author keywords

Additive component; Dominance component; Epistasis; Triple test cross

Indexed keywords

EMBRYOPHYTA; PHASEOLUS (ANGIOSPERM); VIGNA; VIGNA RADIATA; VIGNA RADIATA VAR. RADIATA;

EID: 0036381995     PISSN: 00142336     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1023/A:1019987620535     Document Type: Article

References (17)

1. Burton, G.W., 1968. Heterosis and heterozygous in pearl millet forage production. Crop Sci 8: 229-230.
2. 2 and backcross population. Heredity 25: 419-429.
3. Jinks, J.L., J.M. Perkins & E.L. Breese, 1969. A general method of detecting additive, dominance and epistatic variation for metrical traits: II. Application to inbred lines. Heredity 24: 45-57.
4. Kearsey, M.J. & J.L. Jinks, 1968. A general method of detecting additive, dominance and epistatic variation for metrical traits. I. Theory. Heredity 23: 403-409.
5. Ketata, H., E.L. Smith, L.K. Edwards & R.W. McNew, 1976. Detection of epistatic, additive, and dominance variation in winter wheat. Crop Sci 16: 1-4.
6. Mukher, M.S., T.S. Sandhu & B.S. Bhullar, 1988. Genetics of quantitative characters in summer mungbean (Vigna raidata (L.) Wilczek Var. radiata). Indian J Genet 48(1): 113-114.
7. Pawar, I.S., M. Yunus, S. Singh & V.P. Singh, 1994. Detection of additive, dominance, and epistatic variation in wheat using triple test cross method. Indian J Genet 54(3): 275-280.
8. Poehlman, J.M., 1991. The Mungbean. University of Missouri, Columbia, USA. 343 p.
9. Pooni, H.S. & J.L. Jinks, 1976. The efficiency and optimal size of triple test cross designs for detecting epistatic variation. Heredity 36(2): 215-227.
10. Ram, T., 1997. Gene action for certain quantitative characters in greengram (Vigna radiata (L.) Wilczek). Indian J Genet 57(2): 143-148.
11. Singh, R.K. & B.D. Chaudhary, 1985. Biometrical Methods in Quantitative Genetic Analysis. Kalyani Pub., Ludhiana, New Delhi, Revised Ed.
12. Singh, S., S. Kumar, I.S. Pawar & I. Singh, 1992. Detection and estimation of additive and dominance components and their interactions with sowing date in the presence and absence of epistasis in wheat. Haryana Agric Univ J Res 22: 165-169.
13. Srinives, P. & W. Tangbunitivong, 1991. Genetic study of yield and yield components in mungbean (Vigna radiata (L.) Wilczek) grown in dry and wet seasons. J Natl Res Council Thailand 23(1): 1-13.
14. Thimmappa, A.S., 1987. Genetic analysis of quantitative traits in greengram (Vigna radiata (L.) Wilczek). Mysore J Agric Sci 21(1): 94.
15. Tickoo, J., L. Grajraj, R. Matho & C. Manji, 1996. Plant type in mungbean (Vigna radiata (L.) Wilczek). In: A.N. Asthana & D.H. Kim (Eds.), Proc Recent Adv in Mungbean Research, Indian Society of Pulses Research, Kanpur, India. pp. 197-213.
16. Virk, D.S. & J.L. Jinks, 1977. The consequences of using inadequate testers in the simplified triple test cross. Heredity 38: 237-251.
17. Wilson, N.D., S.T. Merc & N.K. Nayar, 1985. Combining ability in greengram. Indian J Agric Sci 55: 655-670.