Science and ecosystem management in the Albemarle-Pamlico Estuarine Study

Ocean and Coastal Management

Volumn 45, Issue 4-5, 2002, Pages 277-300

  Korfmacher, Katrina Smith ^a  

^a ROCHESTER INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ECOSYSTEMS; ESTUARIES; SOCIETIES AND INSTITUTIONS;

ECOSYSTEM MANAGEMENT;

OCEANOGRAPHY;

COASTAL ZONE MANAGEMENT; ECOSYSTEM MANAGEMENT; ESTUARINE ENVIRONMENT; INTERDISCIPLINARY APPROACH;

ALOCASIA MACRORRHIZOS;

EID: 0036379185     PISSN: 09645691     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/S0964-5691(02)00059-5     Document Type: Article

References (37)

1. APES. Albemarle-Pamlico estuarine study work plan, APES Report 87-02. Raleigh: Department of Environment, Health, and Natural Resources, 1987.
2. Steel J. Albemarle-Pamlico estuarine system: technical analysis of status and trends, APES Report 90-01. Raleigh: Department of Environment, Health, and Natural Resources, 1991.
3. APES. Comprehensive conservation and management plan technical document: Albemarle-Pamlico estuarine study. Raleigh: Department of Environment, Health, and Natural Resources, 1994.
4. USEPA. Saving bays, estuaries: a primer for establishing and managing estuary projects, EPA/503/8-89-0001. Washington, DC: US Government Printing Office, 1989.
5. Cortner HJ, Margaret M. The politics of ecosystem management. Washington, DC: Island Press, 1999.
6. Grumbine RE. What is ecosystem management? Conservation Biology 1994;8:27-38.
7. Korfmacher KLS. Invisible successes, visible failures: paradoxes of ecosystem management in the Albemarle-Pamlico estuarine study. Coastal Management 1998;26(3):191-212.
8. APES. Albemarle-Pamlico Sounds, State/EPA conference agreement for National Estuary Program designation under the Water Quality Act of 1987, October 20, 1987. Raleigh: Department of Environment, Health, and Natural Resources, 1987.
9. Cowling EB. The performance and legacy of NAPAP. Ecological Applications 1992;2(2):111-6.
10. Jasanoff S. The fifth branch: science advisers as policy makers. Cambridge: Harvard University Press, 1990.
11. von Winterfeldt D, Ward E. Decision analysis and behavioral research. New York: Cambridge University Press, 1986.
12. Raiffa H. Decision analysis. Reading: Addison-Wesley, 1968.
13. Winkler R. An introduction to Bayesian inference and decision. New York: Hold, Rinehart and Winston, Inc., 1972.
14. Hartig JH, Zarull MA. Under raps: toward grassroots ecological democracy in the great Lakes Basin. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press, 1992.
15. Lee KN. Appraising adaptive management. Conservation Ecology 1999;3(2):3. [online] URL: http://www.consecol.org/vol3/iss2/art3.
16. Lee KN. Compass and gyroscope. Washington, DC: Island Press, 1993.
17. Underdal A. The politics of science in international resource management: a summary. In: Andresen S, Ostreng W, editors. International resource management: the role of science and politics. London: Belhaven Press, 1989. p. 253-67.
18. Wettestad J. Science, politics, and institutional design. Marine Policy 1994;18(3):219-32.
19. Healey MC, Hennessey TM. The utilization of scientific information in the management of estuarine ecosystems. Ocean and Coastal Management 1994;23:167-91.
20. Greenberger M, Crenson MA, Crissey BL. Models in the policy process: public decision making in the computer era. New York: Russell Sage Foundation, 1976.
21. Funtowicz SO, Ravetz JR. Science for the post-normal age. Futures 1993;25(7):739-55.
22. Clark WC, Majone G. The critical appraisal of scientific inquiries with policy implication. Science, Technology, and Human Values 1985;10(3):6-19.
23. Alpert P. Incarnating ecosystem management. Conservation Biology 1995;9(4):952-5.
24. McMahon G. The role of information in watershed planning: contributions of critical theory and environmental dispute resolution. Dissertation in the Department of City and Regional Planning, University of North Carolina. Chapel Hill, NC: University of North Carolina, 1995.
25. Holling CS, editor. 1978. Adaptive environmental assessment and management. New York: John Wiley & Sons.
26. Walters C. Adaptive management of renewable resources. New York: Macmillan, 1986.
27. Walters C. Challenges in adaptive management of riparian, coastal ecosystems. Conservation Ecology 1997;1(2):1. [online] URL: http://www.consecol.org/vol3/iss2/art2.
28. Haas PM. Saving the Mediterranean: the politics of international environmental cooperation. New York: Columbia University Press, 1990.
29. Brunner RD, Clark TW. Ecosystem management: a practice-based approach. Conservation Biology 1997;11(1):48-58.
30. Korfmacher KLS. Evaluating the National Estuary Program: a case study of the Albemarle-Pamlico Estuarine Study. Doctoral dissertation. Durham, North Carolina: Duke University, 1996.
31. Schmandt J. Civic science. Science Communication 1998;20(1):62-9.
32. Meffe GK, Viederman S. Combining science and policy in conservation biology. Wildlife Society Bulletin 1995;23(3):327-32.
33. Thomas CW. Linking public agencies with community-based watershed organizations: lessons from California. Policy Studies Journal 1999;27(3):544-64.
34. Volkman J, Lee KN. The own and Minerva: ecosystem lessons from the Columbia. Journal of Forestry 1994;92:48-52.
35. Busenberg G. Collaborative and adversarial analysis in environmental policy. Policy Sciences 1999;32:1-11.
36. Lubchenko J. Entering the century of the environment: a new social contract for science. Science 1998;279:491-7.
37. Byerly Jr R, Pielke Jr R. The changing ecology of United States science. Science 1995;269:1531-2.