Morphological and genetic analysis of the Red Hills roach (Cyprinidae: Lavinia symmetricus)

Conservation Genetics

Volumn 3, Issue 3, 2002, Pages 261-276

  Jones, W J ^a   Quelvog, B D ^b   Bernardi, G ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

^b CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF FISH AND GAME   (United States)

Author keywords

California; Hesperoleucus; mtDNA; PCA; Serpentine

Indexed keywords

BIOASSAY; DNA; MORPHOLOGY;

MULTIVARIATE ANALYSIS;

BIODIVERSITY;

CONSERVATION GENETICS; FISH; MORPHOLOGY; PHYLOGENY;

UNITED STATES;

CYPRINIDAE; CYPRINIFORMES; HESPEROLEUCUS; HESPEROLEUCUS SYMMETRICUS; INSECTA; LAVINIA;

EID: 0036376767     PISSN: 15660621     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1023/A:1019963826013     Document Type: Article

References (24)

1. Avise JC (1975) Protein Divergence and Speciation in California Minnows. PhD thesis, University of California, Davis.
2. Avise JC (1994) Molecular Markers, Natural History and Evolution. Chapman and Hall, New York.
3. Brown LR, Moyle PB, Bennett WA, Quelvog BD (1992) Implications of morphological variation among populations of California roach Lavinia symmetricus (Cyprinidae) for conservation policy. Biol. Conserv., 62, 1-10.
4. Burnaby TP (1966) Growth-invariant discriminant functions and generalized distances. Biometrics, 22, 96-110.
5. Excoffier L, Smouse PE, Quattro JM (1992) Analysis of molecular variance inferred from metric distances among DNA haplotypes: application to human mitochondrial DNA restriction data. Genetics, 131, 479-491.
6. Felsenstein J (1985) Confidence limits on phylogenies: An approach using the bootstrap. Evolution, 39, 783-791.
7. Grady JM, Quattro JM (1999) Using character concordance to define taxonomic and conservation units. Conserv. Biol., 13, 1004-1007.
8. JMP Statistics and Graphics Guide (1994) Version 3; SAS Institute Inc. Cary N.C., USA.
9. Jones WJ, Bernardi G. Phylogenetic relationships among L. symmetricus and L. exilicauda subspecies. Submitted to Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution.
10. Kimura M (1980) A simple method for estimating evolutionary rates of base substitutions through comparative studies of nucleotide sequences. J. Mol. Evol., 26, 24-33.
11. Maddison WP, Maddison DR (1992) MacClade 3.05. Sinauer Associates, Sunderland, MA.
12. Moyle PB (1976) Inland Fishes of California. 1st edn., University of California Press Berkeley.
13. Moyle PB (1996) Potential aquatic diversity management areas. Ch. 57 In: Sierra Nevada Ecosystem Project: Final Report to Congress, vol. II, Assessments and Scientific Basis for Management Options. Davis: University of California, Centers for Water and Wildland Resources.
14. Moyle PB, Cech JJ (2001) Fishes: An Introduction to Ichthyology, 4th edn. Prentice Hall, Upper Saddle River, NJ.
15. Moyle PB, William JE, Wikramanayake ED (1995) Fish species of special concern of California (2nd edn.). Final Report, Contract No. 21281F.
16. Murphy GI (1943) Sexual dimorphism in the minnows Hesperoleucus and Rhinichthys. Copeia, 1943, 187-188.
17. Page RDM, Holmes EC (1998) Molecular Evolution - A Phylogenetic Approach. Blackwell Science, Massachusetts.
18. Posada D, Crandall KR (1998) MODELTEST: testing the model of DNA substitution. Bioinform., 14, 817-818.
19. Power ME (1990) Effects of fish in river food webs. Science, 250, 811-814.
20. Rice WR (1989) Analyzing tables of statistical tests. Evolution, 43, 223-225.
21. Rohlf FJ, Bookstein FL (1987) A comment on shearing as a method for 'size correction'. Syst. Zool., 36, 356-367.
22. Schneider S, Roessli D, Excoffier L (2000) ARLEQUIN ver 2.000: a software for population genetics data analysis. Department of Anthropology and Ecology, University of Geneva, Switzerland.
23. Swofford DL (1993) PAUP, phylogenetic analysis using parsimony, version 3.1. Illinois Natural History Survey, Champaign.
24. Swofford DL (1998) PAUP*, phylogenetic analysis using parsimony, version 4.0. Illinois Natural History Survey, Champaign.