Clinical validation and cognitive elaboration: Signs that encourage sustained recycling

Basic and Applied Social Psychology

Volumn 24, Issue 3, 2002, Pages 185-203

  Werner, Carol M ^a   Stoll, Robert ^a   Birch, Paul ^a   White, Paul H ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF UTAH   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 0036373787     PISSN: 01973533     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1207/S15324834BASP2403_2     Document Type: Article

References (50)

1. Alexander, J. F., & Parsons, B. V. (1982). Functional family therapy: Understanding the principles of family functioning. Monterey, CA: Brooks-Cole.
2. Blodgett, J. G., Granbois, D. H., & Walters, R. G. (1993). The effects of perceived justice on complainants' negative word-of-mouth behavior and repatronage intentions. Journal of Retailing, 69, 399-428.
3. Brehm, S. S., & Brehm, J. W. (1981). Psychological reactance: A theory of freedom and control. New York: Academic.
4. Brock, T. C. (1967). Communication discrepancy and intent to persuade as determinants of counterargument production. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 3, 296-309.
5. Bruning, J. L., & Kintz, B. L. (1987). Computational handbook of statistics, (3rd ed.). Glenview, IL: HarperCollins.
6. Burn, S. M., & Oskamp, S. (1986). Increasing community recycling with persuasive communication and public commitment. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 16, 29-41.
7. Chaiken, S. (1987). The heuristic model of persuasion. In M. P. Zanna, J. M. Olson, & C. P. Herman (Eds.), Social influence: The Ontario Symposium (Vol. 5, pp. 3-39). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc.
8. Cialdini, R. B. (1993). Influence: Science and practice (3rd ed.). New York: HarperCollins.
9. Cialdini, R. B., Green, B. L., & Rush, A. J. (1992). When tactical pronouncements of change become real change: The case of reciprocal persuasion. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 63, 357-404.
10. Coates, D., & Wortman, C. B. (1980). Depression maintenance and interpersonal control. In A. Baum & J. E. Singer (Eds.), Advances in environmental psychology, Vol. 2: Applications of personal control (pp. 149-182). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc.
11. Coyne, J. C. (1985). Toward a theory of frames and reframing: The social nature of frames. Journal of Marital and Family Therapy, 11, 337-344.
12. Crano, W. D. (1995). Attitude strength and vested interest. In R. E. Petty & J. A. Krosnick (Eds.), Attitude strength: Antecedents and consequences (pp. 131-158). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc.
13. DeYoung, R. (1993). Changing behavior and making it stick: The conceptualization and management of conservation behavior. Environment and Behavior, 25, 485-505.
14. Eagly, A. H., & Chaiken, S. (Eds.). (1993). The psychology of attitudes. Orlando, FL: Harcourt Brace Jovanovich College.
15. Fazio, R. H. (1990). Multiple processes by which attitudes guide behavior: The MODE model as an integrative framework. In M. P. Zanna (Ed.), Advances in experimental social psychology (Vol. 23, pp. 75-109). New York: Academic.
16. Fazio, R. H. (1995). Attitudes as object - evaluation associations: Determinants, consequences, and correlates of attitude accessibility. In R. E. Petty & J. A. Krosnick (Eds.), Attitude strength: Angecedents and consequences (pp. 247-282). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc.
17. Furlong, C. B. (1993). There's life after blunders. Canadian Banker, 100, 10-13.
18. Geller, E. S., Winett, R. A., & Everett, P. B. (Eds.). (1982). Preserving the environment: New strategies for behavior change. New York: Pergamon.
19. Gottman, J. M. (1979). Marital interaction: Experimental investigations. New York: Academic.
20. Greenwald, A. G. (1968). Cognitive learning, cognitive response to persuasion, and attitude change. In A. G. Greenwald, T. C. Brock, & T. M. Ostrom (Eds.), Psychological foundations of attitudes (pp. 147-170). New York: Academic.
21. Guagnano, G. A., Stern, P. C., & Dietz, T. (1995). Influences on attitude - behavior relationships: A natural experiment with curbside recycling. Environment and Behavior, 27, 699-718.
22. Hatfield, A. B. (1987). Coping and adaptation: A conceptual framework for understanding families. In A. B. Hatfield & H. P. Lefley (Eds.), Families of the mentally ill: Coping and adaptation (pp. 60-84). New York: Guilford.
23. Hormuth, S. E., Katzenstein, H., Bruch, B., & Ringenberger, B. (1993). Psychological studies on garbage avoidance and recycling. In J. Urbina-Soria, P. Ortega-Andeane, & R. Bechtel (Eds.), EDRA 21 proceedings: Healthy environments. Oaxtepec, Morelos, Mexico, March, 1991 (pp. 321-325). Oklahoma City, OK: EDRA.
24. Johnson, B. T., & Eagly, A. H. (1989). Effects of involvement on persuasion: A meta-analysis. Psychological Bulletin, 106, 290-314.
25. Johnson, B. T., & Eagly, A. H. (1990). Involvement and persuasion: Types, traditions, and the evidence. Psychological Bulletin, 107, 375-384.
26. Kelley, B. (1993, January). Customer service: Reality check. Sales and Marketing Management, 145, 50-53.
27. Kraus, M. A., & Redman, E. S. (1986). Postpartum depression: An interactional view. Journal of Marital and Family Therapy, 12(1), 63-74.
28. Langer, E., Blank, A., & Chanowitz, B. (1978). The mindlessness of ostensibly thoughtful action. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 36, 635-642.
29. McGuire, W. J. (1964). Inducing resistance to persuasion: Some contemporary approaches. In L. Berkowitz (Ed.), Advances in experimental social psychology (Vol. 1, pp. 191-229). New York: Academic.
30. Petty, R. E. (1994). Two routes to persuasion: State of the art. In G. d'Ydewalle, P. Eelen, & P. Berteleson (Eds.), International perspectives on psychological science (Vol. 2, pp. 229-247). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc.
31. Petty, R. E., & Cacioppo, J. T. (1979a). Effects of forewarning of persuasive intent and involvement on cognitive responses and persuasion. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 5, 173-176.
32. Petty, R. E., & Cacioppo, J. T. (1979b). Issue involvement can increase or decrease persuasion by enhancing message-relevant cognitive responses. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 37, 1915-1926.
33. Petty, R. E., & Cacioppo, J. T. (1981). Attitudes and persuasion: Classic and contemporary approaches. Dubuque, IA: Brown.
34. Petty, R. E., & Cacioppo, J. T. (1984). The effects of involvement on responses to argument quantity and quality: Central and peripheral routes to persuasion. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 46, 69-81.
35. Petty, R. E., & Cacioppo, J. T. (1986a). The elaboration likelihood model of persuasion. In L. Berkowitz (Ed.), Advances in experimental social psychology (Vol. 19, pp. 123-205). Orlando, FL: Academic.
36. Petty, R. E., & Cacioppo, J. T. (Eds.). (1986b). Communication and persuasion: Central and peripheral routes to attitude change. New York: Springer-Verlag.
37. Petty, R. E., & Cacioppo, J. T. (1990). Involvement and persuasion: Tradition versus integration. Psychological Bulletin, 107, 367-374.
38. Petty, R. E., Cacioppo, J. T., & Goldman, R. (1981). Personal involvement as a determinant of argument-based persuasion. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 41, 847-855.
39. Petty, R. E., Cacioppo, J. T., & Heesacker, M. (1981). Effects of rhetorical questions on persuasion: A cognitive response analysis. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 40, 432-440.
40. Petty, R. E., Haugvedt, C. P., & Smith, S. M. (1995). Elaboration as a determinant of attitude strength: Creating attitudes that are persistent, resistant, and predictive of behavior. In R. E. Petty & J. A. Krosnick (Eds.), Attitude strength: Antecedents and consequences (pp. 93-130). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc.
41. Petty, R. E., Wells, G. L., & Brock, T. C. (1976). Distraction can enhance or reduce yielding to propaganda: Thought disruption versus effort justification. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 34, 874-884.
42. Rennier, G. A. (1988). The strength of the object - evaluation association, the attitude - behavior relationship and the elaboration likelihood model of persuasion. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Missouri, Columbia.
43. Rogers, C. (1951). Client-centered therapy. Boston: Houghton Mifflin.
44. Stern, P. C., & Oskamp, S. (1987). Managing scarce environmental resources. In D. Stokols & I. Altman (Eds.), Handbook of environmental psychology (Vol. 2, pp. 1043-1088). New York: Wiley.
45. Werner, C. M. (1999). Sustainability: Psychological perspectives. In E. Becker & T. Jahn (Eds.), Sustainablity and the social sciences: A cross-disciplinary approach to integrating environmental considerations into theoretical reorientation (pp. 223-242). London: ZED.
46. Werner, C. M., & Adams, D. (2001). Changing homeowners' behaviors with toxic household chemicals: A psychological, multi-level approach. Analyses of Social Issues and Public Policy, 1, 1-31.
47. Werner, C. M., Rhodes, M. U., & Partain, K. K. (1998). Designing effective instructional signs with schema theory: Case studies of polystyrene recycling. Environment and Behavior, 30, 709-735.
48. White, P. H., & Harkins, S. G. (1994). Race of source effects in the elaboration likelihood model. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 67, 790-807.
49. Wikler, L., Wasow, M., & Hatfield, E. (1981). Chronic sorrow revisited: Parent vs. professional depiction of the adjustment of parents of mentally retarded children. American Journal of Orthopsychiatry, 51, 63-70.
50. Winer, B. J. (1962). Statistical principles in experimental design. New York: McGraw-Hill.