|
|
Volumn 42, Issue 1, 2002, Pages 44-50
|
|
The prosecutor's fallacy - A pitfall in interpreting probabilities in forensic evidence
|
|
Author keywords
[No Author keywords available]
|
|
Indexed keywords
ARTICLE;
BAYES THEOREM;
BLOOD GROUP TYPING;
DNA FINGERPRINTING;
EXPERT WITNESS;
FEMALE;
FORENSIC MEDICINE;
HOMICIDE;
HUMAN;
INFANT;
LEGAL ASPECT;
MALE;
METHODOLOGY;
OBSERVER VARIATION;
PROBABILITY;
RAPE;
STATISTICAL ANALYSIS;
STATISTICS;
SUDDEN INFANT DEATH SYNDROME;
UNITED KINGDOM;
UNITED STATES;
BAYES THEOREM;
BLOOD GROUPING AND CROSSMATCHING;
CALIFORNIA;
DATA INTERPRETATION, STATISTICAL;
DNA FINGERPRINTING;
EXPERT TESTIMONY;
FEMALE;
FORENSIC MEDICINE;
GREAT BRITAIN;
HOMICIDE;
HUMANS;
INFANT;
MALE;
OBSERVER VARIATION;
PROBABILITY;
RAPE;
SUDDEN INFANT DEATH;
|
|
EID: 0036372194
PISSN: 00258024
EISSN: None
Source Type: Journal
DOI: 10.1177/002580240204200108 Document Type: Article |
|
Times cited : (18)
|
|
References (1)
|
