Outcomes of Training Nurses To Conduct Breast and Cervical Cancer Screening of Native American Women

Holistic Nursing Practice

Volumn 16, Issue 2, 2002, Pages 58-79

  Petersen, Wesley O ^a   Trapp, Mary Alice ^a   Vierkant, Robert A ^a   Sellers, Thomas A ^a   Kottke, Thomas E ^a   de Groen, Piet C ^a   Nicometo, Ann Marie ^a   Kaur, Judith Salmon ^a  

^a MAYO CLINIC CANCER CENTER   (United States)

Author keywords

Cancer screening; Native American health care; Nurse training; Professional developments; Program evaluation

Indexed keywords

AMERICAN INDIAN; ARTICLE; BREAST TUMOR; COMMUNITY HEALTH NURSING; CULTURAL FACTOR; ETHNOLOGY; FEMALE; HEALTH CARE QUALITY; HUMAN; IN SERVICE TRAINING; LITERATURE; MASS SCREENING; NURSING; NURSING EDUCATION; PSYCHOLOGICAL ASPECT; QUESTIONNAIRE; STANDARD; STATISTICS; UNITED STATES; UTERINE CERVIX TUMOR;

ANECDOTES; BREAST NEOPLASMS; CULTURAL CHARACTERISTICS; EDUCATION, NURSING, CONTINUING; FEMALE; HUMANS; INDIANS, NORTH AMERICAN; INSERVICE TRAINING; MASS SCREENING; PROGRAM EVALUATION; PUBLIC HEALTH NURSING; QUESTIONNAIRES; UNITED STATES; UTERINE CERVICAL NEOPLASMS;

EID: 0036370726     PISSN: 08879311     EISSN: 15505138     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1097/00004650-200201000-00009     Document Type: Article

References (56)

1. ACS. Cancer Facts and Figures 2000. Atlanta, GA: American Cancer Society; 2000.
2. Baquet CR. Native Americans' cancer rates in comparison with other peoples of color. Cancer. 1996; 78(7 Suppl):1538-1544.
3. Lanier AP, Kelly JJ, Smith B, et al. Alaska native cancer update: Incidence rates 1989-1993. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev. 1996;5(9):749-751.
4. Cobb N, Paisano RE. Cancer Mortality among American Indians and Alaska Natives in the United States: Regional Differences in Indian Health. Rockville, MD: Indian Health Service; 1997.
5. Coughlin SS, Uhler RJ, Blackman DK. Breast and cervical cancer screening practices among American Indian and Alaska Native women in the United States, 1992-1997. Prev Med. 1999;29(4):287-295.
6. Blackman DK, Bennett EM, Miller DS. Trends in self-reported use of mammograms (1989-1997) and Papanicolaou tests (1991-1997): Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System. MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep CDC Surveillance Summary. 1999;48(6):1-22.
7. National Indian Health Board. Quarterly Board Report. Denver, CO: National Indian Health Board; 1997.
8. Burhansstipanov L. Cancer mortality among native Americans. Cancer. 1998;83(11):2247-2250.
9. Michalek AM, Mahoney MC. Provision of cancer control services to native Americans by state health departments. J Cancer Educ. 1994;9(3):145-147.
10. Provost EM. Cervical cancer screening on the Yukon-Kuskokwim Delta, Southwest Alaska. A population-based study. Cancer. 1996;78(7 Suppl):1598-1602.
11. Fallsdown D, Hammond N, Kuefler P, et al. Cancer control survey among Crow and Cheyenne Native American females who live on the Crow and Cheyenne reservations. Proc Am Society of Clin Oncol. May 1991, Houston, Texas.
12. Burhansstipanov L, Dignan MB, Wound DB, et al. Native American recruitment into breast cancer screening: the NAWWA project. J Cancer Educ. 2000;15(1):28-32.
13. Frisch LL, Allen GD, Padonu G, Dontje KJ, Burhansstipanov L. Social influences on Pap smear screening frequency. Alaska Med. 2000;42(2):41-45, 47.
14. Stillwater B. The Alaska native women's wellness project. Health Care Women Int. 1999;20(5):487-492.
15. Brant JM, Fallsdown D, Iverson ML. The evolution of a breast health program for Plains Indian women. Oncol Nurs Forum. 1999;26(4):731-739.
16. Michielutte R, Sharp PC, Dignan MB, Blinson K. Cultural issues in the development of cancer control programs for American Indian populations. J Health Care Poor Underserved. 1994;5(4):280-296.
17. Partin MR, Korn JE, Slater JS. Questionable data and preconceptions: Reconsidering the value of mammography for American Indian Women. Am J Public Health. 1997;87(7):1100-1102.
18. Michalek AM, Mahoney MC, Papas M, Tenney M, Burhansstipanov L. Tribal-based cancer control activities among Alaska Natives: Services and perceptions. Alaska Med. 1996;38(2):59-64, 83.
19. Michalek AM, Mahoney MC, Tome D, Tenney M, Burhansstipanov L. Tribal-based cancer control activities. Services and perceptions. Cancer. 1996; 78(7 Suppl):1574-1577.
20. Burhansstipanov L. Urban native American health issues. Cancer. 2000;88(5 Suppl):1207-1213.
21. Dignan M, Sharp P, Blinson K, et al. Development of a cervical cancer education program for native American women in North Carolina. J Cancer Educ. 1995;9(4):235-242.
22. Kottke TE, Trapp MA. Implementing nurse-based systems to provide American Indian women with breast and cervical cancer screening. Mayo Clin Proc. 1998;73(9):815-823.
23. Romero S. Tribes seeking phone systems as step to Web. New York Times. New York, 2000.
24. Kaur JS. The potential impact of cancer survivors on native American cancer prevention and treatment. Cancer. 1996;78(7 Suppl):1578-1581.
25. Weaver HN. Transcultural nursing with native Americans: Critical knowledge, skills, and attitudes. J Transcult Nurs. 1999;10(3):197-202.
26. Antle A. Ethnic perspectives of cancer nursing: The American Indian. Oncol Nurs Forum. 1987;14(3):70-73.
27. Creagan ET, Fraumeni JF, Jr. Cancer mortality among American Indians, 1950-67. J Natl Cancer Inst. 1972;49(4):959-967.
28. Black Feather J. Cultural beliefs and understanding cancer. Am Indian Culture Res J. 1992;16(3):139-145.
29. Strickland CJ, Squeoch MD, Chrisman NJ. Health promotion in cervical cancer prevention among the Yakama Indian women of the Wa'Shat Longhouse. J Transcult Nurs. 1999;10(3):190-196.
30. Valway Se. Cancer Mortality among Native Americans in the United States: Regional Differences in Indian Health, 1984-1988 and Trends over Time, 1968-1987. Rockville, MD: U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, Public Health Service, Indian Health Service; 1991.
31. Baird SB. Introduction to cancer nursing. In: Society AC, ed. A Cancer Sourcebook for Nurses. 7th ed. Atlanta, GA: American Cancer Society; 1997: 3-10.
32. Frank-Stromborg M. Cancer screening and early detection. In: Society AC, ed. A Cancer Sourcebook for Nurses 7th ed. Atlanta, GA: American Cancer Society; 199:43-55.
33. Fowler MD. Relic or resource? The code for nurses. Am J Nurs. 1999;99(3):56-58.
34. Holliday ME, Parker DL. Florence Nightingale, feminism and nursing. J Adv Nurs. 1997;26(3):483-488.
35. Dolan JA. A History of Nursing. Philadelphia: W.B. Saunders Company; 1968.
36. Foote JE. State Board Questions and Answers. Philadelphia: J.B. Lippincott Co.; 1917.
37. Langston N. President's message. Coming full circle with the Nightingale legacy. Nurs Health Care Perspect. 1999;20(6):280.
38. Kitson AL. Johns Hopkins address: Does nursing have a future? Image J Nurs Sch. 1997;29(2):111-115.
39. Hart PD. A Nationwide Survey of Attitudes Towards Health Care and Nurses. Washington, D.C.: P.D. Hart Research Associates; 1990.
40. Kottke TE. Overcoming the barriers to cancer screening. Mayo Clin Proc. 1998;73(4):386-388.
41. Kottke TE, Trapp MA. Time since prior testing and quality of Pap test specimens collected by nurses trained to serve Native populations. Cancer. 1998;83:1809-1814.
42. Kottke TE, Trapp MA. The quality of Pap test specimens collected by nurses in a breast and cervical cancer screening clinic. Am J Prev Med. 1998;14(3):196-200.
43. Trapp MA, Kottke TE, Vierkant RA, Kaur JS, Sellers TA. The ability of trained nurses to detect lumps in a test set of silicone breast models. Cancer. 1999;86(9):1750-1756.
44. Massingberd K. The role of nurses in a comprehensive cancer screening programme for women in Finland. In: Pritchard AP, ed. Cancer Nursing a Revolution in Care: Proceedings of the Fifth International Conference on Cancer Screening. New York: Springer-Verlag New York; 1989:135-37.
45. Pachciarz JA, Abbott MI, Gorman B, Henneman CE, Kuhl M. Continuous quality improvement of Pap smears in an ambulatory care facility. Qual Rev Bull. 1992;18(7):229-235.
46. Fletcher SW, O'Malley MS, Bunce LA. Physicians' abilities to detect lumps in silicone breast models. JAMA. 1985;253(15):2224-2228.
47. Cox GC, Smith DL, Rakes TA. Enhancing comprehension through the use of visual elaboration strategies. Reading Res Instruct. 1995;33(3):159-174.
48. Isaac AR. Mental practice: Does it work in the field? Sport Psychol. 1992;6(2):192-198.
49. McIntosh WJ. The effect of imagery generation on science rule learning. J Res Sci Teaching. 1986;23(1):1-9.
50. Dwyer CA, Dwyer FM. The effect of visualized instruction and varied rehearsal and evaluation strategies (verbal and visual) in facilitating students' long-term retention on tests measuring different instructional objectives. J Vis Verbal Languaging. 1985;5:15-27.
51. Miles M, Huberman AM. Qualitative Data Analysis: A Sourcebook of New Methods. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage Publications; 1984.
52. Goetz JP, LeCompte MD. Ethnography and Qualitative Design in Educational Research. New York: Academic Press; 1984.
53. Burhansstipanov L, Dresser CM. Native American monograph no. 1: Documentation of the cancer research needs of American Indians and Alaska Native. Bethesda, MD: National Cancer Institute; 1993.
54. Kaur JS. Native women and cancer. Health Care Women Int 1999;20(5):445-53.
55. Cobb N, Paisano RE. Patterns of cancer mortality among Native Americans. Cancer 1998;83(11):2377-83.
56. Partin MR, Rith-Najarian SJ, Slater JS, Korn JE, Cobb N, Soler JT. Improving cancer incidence estimates for American Indians in Minnesota. Am J Public Health 1999;89(11):1673-7.