EFNEP: A nutrition education program that demonstrates cost-benefit

Journal of the American Dietetic Association

Volumn 102, Issue 1, 2002, Pages 39-45

  Burney, Janie ^a   Haughton, Betsy ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF TENNESSEE   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ASCORBIC ACID; IRON; PYRIDOXINE; SODIUM CHLORIDE;

ADULT; AGED; ARTICLE; BEHAVIOR; COMPARATIVE STUDY; CONTROLLED STUDY; COOKING; COST BENEFIT ANALYSIS; COST CONTROL; FEMALE; FIBER; FOOD; FOOD INTAKE; HEALTH ECONOMICS; HEALTH PROGRAM; HEALTH SURVEY; HUMAN; IRON INTAKE; MEDICAL EDUCATION; NUTRIENT; NUTRITION; RECORDING; SCORING SYSTEM; STATISTICAL ANALYSIS; VITAMIN INTAKE; ADOLESCENT; CATERING SERVICE; COST; ECONOMICS; FOOD PACKAGING; HEALTH EDUCATION; MEDICAL RECORD; MIDDLE AGED; NUTRITIONAL VALUE;

NUCLEOPOLYHEDROVIRUS;

ADOLESCENT; ADULT; AGED; COST-BENEFIT ANALYSIS; COSTS AND COST ANALYSIS; DIET RECORDS; FEMALE; FOOD; FOOD LABELING; FOOD SERVICES; HEALTH EDUCATION; HUMANS; MIDDLE AGED; NUTRITION PHYSIOLOGY; NUTRITIVE VALUE;

EID: 0036370171     PISSN: 00028223     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/S0002-8223(02)90014-3     Document Type: Article

References (32)

1. Oliveira V. Cost of food-assistance programs declined slightly in first half of 1996. Food Review. 1996;September-December:26-33.
2. Splett PL. The Nutrition Practitioner's Guide to Cost Effectiveness Analysis of Nutrition Interventions. Arlington, Va: National Center for Education in Maternal and Child Health; 1996.
3. Splett PL. Phase I: Status report of existing data on the effectiveness, cost, and cost effectiveness of nutrition care services. J Am Diet Assoc. 1991;91(Suppl):S9-S14.
4. Buescher PA, Larson LC, Nelson MD, Lenithan, AJ. Prenatal WIC participation can reduce low birth weight and newborn medical costs: a cost-benefit analysis of WIC participation in North Carolina. J Am Diet Assoc. 1993;93:163-166.
5. The Savings in Medicaid Costs for Newborns and Their Mothers from Prenatal Participation in the WIC Program. Washington, DC: Prepared by Mathematica Policy Research Inc for Food and Nutrition Service, Office of Analysis and Evaluation, US Dept of Agriculture; 1991.
6. Schramm WF. WIC prenatal participation and its relationship to newborn Medicaid costs in Missouri: a cost/benefit analysis. Am J Public Health. 1985;75:851-857.
7. Montgomery DL, Splett PL. Economic benefit of breast-feeding infants enrolled in WIC. J Am Diet Assoc. 1997;97:379-385.
8. Brauer PM, Imes S, Thomson ABR. Economic impact of nutrition counseling in patients with Chrohn's disease in Canada. J Can Diet Assoc. 1988;49:236-240.
9. MacCracken KA, Scalisi JC. Development and evaluation of a ketogenic diet program. J Am Diet Assoc. 2000;99:1554-1558.
10. Enyart Y. Evaluation of Limited One-to-One Nutrition Lessons Plus Mailed Lessons and Follow-up Telephone Contacts. Columbia, Mo: Prepared by The University of Missouri for the Cooperative Extension Service, US Dept of Agriculture; 1984. Cooperative Agreement Number: 12-05-300-550.
11. Jackson RW. Cost Efficiency and Effectiveness of Two Nutrition Education Methods for Food Stamp Recipients. Burlington, Vt: Prepared by The University of Vermont for the Cooperative Extension Service, US Dept of Agriculture; 1986. Cooperative Agreement Number: 12-05-300-550.
12. Neilan AM. Evaluating the Effectiveness of Small Group Methods in Nutrition Education for Young Mothers Receiving Public Food Assistance. Blacksburg, Va: Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University; 1985.
13. Lambur M, Rajgopal R, Lewis E, Cox RH, Ellerbrock M. Applying Cost Benefit Analysis to Nutrition Education Programs: Focus on the Virginia Expanded Food and Nutrition Education Program. Blacksburg Va: Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University; 1999. Publication 490-403.
14. Circular No. A94. Washington DC: Government Accounting Office, US Office of Management and Budget; 1992.
15. Washington, DC: US Dept of Health and Human Services. Poverty Guidelines. Federal Register, Vol 63, No. 36. Washington, DC;1998.
16. Wang MQ, Fitzugh E, Westerfield RC. Determining sample size for simple-random surveys. Health Values. 1995;19:53-56.
17. Wunsch DR. Survey research: Determining sample size and representative response. Business Education Forum. 1986; February:31-34.
18. Food Guide Pyramid: A Guide to Daily Food Choices. Washington, DC: US Dept of Agriculture, Human Nutrition Information Service; 1992. Home and Garden Bulletin No. 252.
19. Joy AB. Development of a simplified methodology to measure the effect of food purchasing practices on nutrient costs. Presented at: Cooperative State Research, Education and Extension Service Meeting, Nutrition Education for Diverse Audiences. February 10-14, 1997; Houston, Tex.
20. EFNEP Evaluation/Reporting System User's Guide, Version 3.0. Laurel, Md: Cooperative Extension System, US Dept of Agriculture; 1993.
21. Clemmer B, Haddix AC. Cost-benefit analysis. In: Haddix AC, Teutsch SM, Shaffer PA, Duñet D, eds. Prevention Effectiveness: A Guide to Decision Analysis and Economic Evaluation. New York: Oxford University Press; 1996:85-102.
22. Nas T. Cost-Benefit Analysis: Theory and Application. Thousand Oaks, Calif: Sage Publications, Inc; 1996.
23. Shaffer PA, Haddix AC. Time preference. In: Haddix AC, Teutsch SM, Shaffer PA, Duñet D, eds. Prevention Effectiveness: A Guide to Decision Analysis and Economic Evaluation. New York: Oxford University Press; 1996,76-84.
24. Green LW, Wang VL, Ephross PH. A 3-year longitudinal study of the impact of nutrition aides on the knowledge, attitudes, and practices of rural poor homemakers. Am J Public Health. 1974;64:722-724.
25. Torisky D, Hertzler A, Mifflin B. Evaluation of the Expanded Food and Nutrition Education Program (EFNEP) in Selected Areas of Virginia: Extent and Retention of Dietary Improvement and Related Family Factors. Blacksburg Va: Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University; 1987.
26. Nierman LG. A Longitudinal Study of the Retention of Foods and Nutrition Knowledge and Practices of Participants from Michigan Expanded Food and Nutrition Education Program. East Lansing, Mich: Michigan State University; 1986.
27. Warner KE, Luce BR. Cost-Benefit and Cost-Effectiveness Analysis in Health Care. Ann Arbor, Mich: Health Administration Press;1982.
28. Russell LB, Gold MR, Siegel JE, Daniels N, Weinstein MC. The role of cost-effectiveness analysi in health and medicine. JAMA. 1996;276:1171-1177.
29. Summary of Adult Participant Profiles. EFNEP Reporting System. Knoxville, Tenn: The University of Tennessee Agricultural Extension Service; 1998.
30. Willett W. Nutritional Epidemiology. New York: Oxford University Press; 1998.
31. DeWalt KM, D'Angelo S, McFadden M, Danner W, Noland M, Kotchen JM. The use of itemized register tapes for analysis of household food acquisition patterns prompted by children. J Am Diet Assoc. 1990;90:559-562.
32. Gerace T. The descriptive sales slip: A dietary assessment tool on the horizon. J Am Diet Assoc. 1986;86:515-516.