|
Volumn 69, Issue 2, 2002, Pages 85-90
|
The current diagnosis of superficial bladder cancer must be reconsidered
|
Author keywords
[No Author keywords available]
|
Indexed keywords
AMINOLEVULINIC ACID;
BLADDER CARCINOMA;
CANCER DIAGNOSIS;
CANCER GROWTH;
CANCER RECURRENCE;
CARCINOMA IN SITU;
CONFOCAL LASER MICROSCOPY;
DEVICE;
DIAGNOSTIC ACCURACY;
DIAGNOSTIC IMAGING;
DIAGNOSTIC PROCEDURE;
DIAGNOSTIC VALUE;
FLUORESCENCE ENDOSCOPY;
FOLLOW UP;
HUMAN;
OPTICAL COHERENCE TOMOGRAPHY;
PRIORITY JOURNAL;
REVIEW;
SUPERFICIAL CANCER;
URINE;
ANTIGENS, NEOPLASM;
CYSTOSCOPY;
FLUORESCENT DYES;
HUMANS;
TUMOR MARKERS, BIOLOGICAL;
URINARY BLADDER NEOPLASMS;
|
EID: 0036370033
PISSN: 00421138
EISSN: None
Source Type: Journal
DOI: 10.1159/000065552 Document Type: Review |
Times cited : (7)
|
References (43)
|