Flexibility of the mitral annulus with the duran ring at six years post-implantation

Journal of Heart Valve Disease

Volumn 11, Issue 1, 2002, Pages 32-38

  Okada, Yukikatsu ^a   Nasu, Michihiro ^a   Kawai, Junichi ^a   Kanzaki, Yumiko ^a  

^a KOBE CITY MEDICAL CENTER GENERAL HOSPITAL   (Japan)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADULT; AGED; ARTICLE; CLINICAL ARTICLE; CLINICAL STUDY; CONTROLLED STUDY; DISEASE SEVERITY; FEMALE; FOLLOW UP; HEART CYCLE; HUMAN; IMAGE RECONSTRUCTION; IMPLANTATION; MALE; MITRAL VALVE REGURGITATION; MITRAL VALVE REPLACEMENT; PHYSICAL PARAMETERS; POSTOPERATIVE PERIOD; PRIORITY JOURNAL; SINUS RHYTHM; SURGICAL TECHNIQUE; THEORY; THREE DIMENSIONAL IMAGING; TRANSESOPHAGEAL ECHOCARDIOGRAPHY; HEART CONTRACTION; HEART VALVE PROSTHESIS; MIDDLE AGED; MITRAL VALVE; PROSTHESIS; REOPERATION;

AGED; ECHOCARDIOGRAPHY, TRANSESOPHAGEAL; FEMALE; HEART VALVE PROSTHESIS; HUMANS; IMAGING, THREE-DIMENSIONAL; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; MITRAL VALVE; MITRAL VALVE INSUFFICIENCY; MYOCARDIAL CONTRACTION; PROSTHESIS DESIGN; REOPERATION;

EID: 0036369488     PISSN: 09668519     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (16)

1. Carpentier A, Deloche A, Dauptain J, et al. A new reconstructive operation for correction of mitral and tricuspid insufficiency. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 1971;61:1-14
2. Carpentier A, Chauvaud S, Fabiani JN, et al. Reconstructive surgery of mitral valve incompetence: Ten-year appraisal. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 1980;79:338-348
3. Duran CG, Ubago JLM. Clinical and hemodynamic performance of a totally flexible prosthetic ring for atrioventricular valve reconstruction. Ann Thorac Surg 1976;22:458-463
4. Okada Y, Shomura T, Yamaura Y, et al. Comparison of the Carpentier and Duran prosthetic ring used in mitral reconstruction. Ann Thorac Surg 1995;59:658-663
5. Yamaura Y, Yoshikawa J, Yoshida K, et al. Three-dimensional analysis of configuration and dynamics in patients with an annuloplasty ring by multiplane transesophageal echocardiography: Comparison between flexible and rigid annuloplasty rings. J Heart Valve Dis 1995;4:618-622
6. Yamaura Y, Yoshida K, Hozumi T, et al. Three-dimensional echocardiographic evaluation of configuration and dynamics of the mitral annulus in patients fitted with an annuloplasty ring. J Heart Valve Dis 1997;6:43-47
7. Yamaura Y, Yoshida K, Hozumi T, et al. Evaluation of the mitral annulus by extracted three-dimensional images in patients with an annuloplasty ring. Am J Cardiol 1998;82:534-536
8. David T, Komeda M, Pollick C, Burns R. Mitral valve annuloplasty: The effect of the type on left ventricular function. Ann Thorac Surg 1989;47:524-528
9. Kunzelman KS, Reimink MS, Cochran RP. Flexible versus rigid annuloplasty for mitral valve annular dilatation: A finite model. J Heart Valve Dis 1998;7:108-116
10. Van Rijk-Zwikker GL, Mast F, Schipperheyn JJ, et al. Comparison of rigid and flexible rings for annuloplasty of the porcine mitral valve. Circulation 1990;82(suppl.IV):IV-58-IV-64
11. Ormiston JA, Shah PM, Tei C, et al. Size and motion of the mitral valve annulus in man I. A two-dimensional echocardiographic method and findings in normal subjects. Circulation 1981;64:113-120
12. Levine RA, Triulzi MO, Harrigan P, et al. The relationship of the mitral annular shape to the diagnosis of mitral valve prolapse. Circulation 1987;75:756-767
13. Gillinov AM, Cosgrove DM, III, Shiota T, et al. Cosgrove-Edwards annuloplasty system: Midterm results. Ann Thorac Surg 2000;69:717-721
14. Flachskampf FA, Chanda S, Gaddipatti A, et al. Analysis of shape and motion of the mitral annulus in subjects with and without cardiomyopathy by echocardiographic 3-dimensional reconstruction. J Am Soc Echocardiogr 2000;13:277-287
15. Bolling SF, Pagani FD, Deeb GM, et al. Intermediate-term outcome of mitral reconstruction in cardiomyopathy. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 1998;115:381-388
16. Komoda T, Hübler M, Siniawski H, Hetzer R. Annular stabilization in mitral repair without a prosthetic ring. J Heart Valve Dis 2000;9:776-782