Long-Term Changes in Soft Tissue Height on the Facial Surface of Dental Implants

Implant Dentistry

Volumn 11, Issue 3, 2002, Pages 272-279

  Oates, T W ^a   West, J ^a   Jones, J ^a   Kaiser, D ^a   Cochran, D L ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS HEALTH SCIENCE CENTER AT SAN ANTONIO   (United States)

Author keywords

Esthetics; Hyperplasia; Implant; Mucosa; Prosthesis; Recession

Indexed keywords

ADOLESCENT; ADULT; AGED; ANALYSIS OF VARIANCE; ARTICLE; CANINE TOOTH; CHI SQUARE DISTRIBUTION; FEMALE; GINGIVA; GINGIVA DISEASE; HUMAN; HYPERPLASIA; INCISOR; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; PATHOLOGY; PROSPECTIVE STUDY; TOOTH IMPLANTATION; TOOTH PROSTHESIS;

ADOLESCENT; ADULT; AGED; ANALYSIS OF VARIANCE; CHI-SQUARE DISTRIBUTION; CUSPID; DENTAL IMPLANTATION, ENDOSSEOUS; DENTAL IMPLANTS; DENTAL PROSTHESIS, IMPLANT-SUPPORTED; FEMALE; GINGIVA; GINGIVAL RECESSION; HUMANS; HYPERPLASIA; INCISOR; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; PROSPECTIVE STUDIES;

EID: 0036367449     PISSN: 10566163     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1097/00008505-200207000-00013     Document Type: Article

References (15)

1. Scheller H, Klineberg I, Stevenson-Moore P, et al. A 5-year multicenter study on implant-supported single crown restorations. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 1998;13:212-218.
2. Adell R, Lekholm U, Rockier B, et al. Marginal tissue reactions at osseointegrated titanium fixtures (I). A 3-year longitudinal prospective study. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 1986;15:39-52.
3. Apse P, Zarb GA, Schmitt A, et al. The longitudinal effectiveness of osseointegrated dental implants. The Toronto study: Peri-implant mucosal response. Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent. 1991;11:95-111.
4. Bengazi F, Wennstrom J, Lekholm U. Recession of the soft tissue margin at oral implants. A 2-year longitudinal prospective study. Clin Oral Implants Res. 1996;7:303-310.
5. Chang M, Wennstrom J, Odman P, et al. Implant supported single-tooth replacements compared to contralateral natural teeth. Crown and soft tissue dimensions. Clin Oral Implants Res. 1999;10: 185-194.
6. Astrand P, Almfeldt I, Brunell G, et al. Non-submerged implants in the treatment of the edentulous lower jaw. A 2-year longitudinal study. Clin Oral Implants Res. 1996;7:337-344.
7. Jemt T, Book K, Lie A, et al. Mucosal topography around implants in edentulous upper jaws. Photogrammetric three-dimensional measurements of the effect of replacement of a removable prothesis with a fixed prosthesis. Clin Oral Implants Res. 1994;5:220-228.
8. Buser D, Mericske-Stern R, Dula K, et al. Clinical experience with one-stage, non-submerged dental implants. Adv Dent Res. 1999;13:153-161.
9. Moberg L, Kondell P, Kullman L, et al. Evaluation of single-tooth restoration on ITI dental implants. Clin Oral Implants Res. 1999;10:45-53.
10. Cochran D, Hermann J, Schenk R, et al. Biologic width around titanium implants. A histometric analysis of the implanto-gingival junction around unloaded and loaded nonsubmerged implants in the canine mandible. J Periodontol. 1997;68:186-198.
11. Bragger U, Burgin WB, Hammerle H, et al. Associations between clinical parameters assessed around implants and teeth. Clin Oral Implants Res. 1997;8: 412-421.
12. Small PN, Tarnow DP. Gingival recession around implants: A 1-year longitudinal prospective study. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2000;15:527-532.
13. Mericske-Stern R, Grütter L, Rösch R, et al. Clinical evaluation and prosthetic complications of single tooth replacements by non-submerged implants. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2001;12: 309-318.
14. Carmagnola D, Araujo M, Berglundh T, et al. Bone tissue reaction around implants placed in a compromised jaw. J Clin Periodontol. 1999;26: 629-635.
15. Grunder U. Stability of the mucosal topography around single-tooth implants and adjacent teeth: 1-year results. Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent. 2000;20: 11-17.