Shear bond strength of bis-acryl composite provisional material repaired with flowable composite

Journal of Esthetic and Restorative Dentistry

Volumn 14, Issue 1, 2002, Pages 47-52

  Hagge, Mark S ^a   Lindemuth, James S ^a,b,c   Jones, Ammon G ^b,c  

^a UNIVERSITY OF THE PACIFIC   (United States)

^b USAF   (United States)

^c DAVID GRANT MEDICAL CENTER   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ALUMINUM OXIDE; FLOWABLE HYBRID COMPOSITE; OPTIBOND SOLO PLUS; RESIN; RESIN CEMENT; REVOLUTION (COMPOSITE RESIN); WATER;

AIR; ANALYSIS OF VARIANCE; ARTICLE; CHEMISTRY; DENTAL BONDING; HUMAN; MATERIALS TESTING; MECHANICAL STRESS; STATISTICAL ANALYSIS; STATISTICS; SURFACE PROPERTY; TENSILE STRENGTH; THERMODYNAMICS; VISCOSITY;

AIR; ALUMINUM OXIDE; ANALYSIS OF VARIANCE; COMPOSITE RESINS; DENTAL BONDING; HUMANS; MATCHED-PAIR ANALYSIS; MATERIALS TESTING; RESIN CEMENTS; STATISTICS; STRESS, MECHANICAL; SURFACE PROPERTIES; TENSILE STRENGTH; THERMODYNAMICS; VISCOSITY; WATER;

EID: 0036366584     PISSN: 14964155     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1708-8240.2002.tb00147.x     Document Type: Article

References (16)

1. Rosenstiel SF, Land MF, Fujimoto J. Contemporary fixed prosthodontics. 3rd Ed. St. Louis: CV Mosby, 2001:380-416.
2. Gunning RL, Certosimo F, Diefenderfer K. Custom provisional restorative materials. Naval Dental School, Bethesda, Maryland. Clinical Update 1998; 20:1-5.
3. Young HM, Smith CT, Morton D. Comparative evaluation of two provisional restorative materials. J Prosthet Dent 2001; 85:129-132.
4. Driscoll CF, Woolsey G, Ferguson WM. Comparison of exothermic release during polymerization of four materials used to fabricate interim restorations. J Prosthet Dent 1991; 65:504-506.
5. Diaz-Arnold AM, Dunne JT, Jones AH. Microhardness of provisional fixed prosthodontic materials. J Prosthet Dent 1999; 82:525-528.
6. Fleisch L, Cleaton-Jones P, Forbes M, van Wyk J, Fat C. Pulpal response to a bis-acryl-plastic (Protemp) temporary crown and bridge material. J Oral Pathol 1984; 13:622-631.
7. Lang R, Rosentritt M, Leibrock A, Behr M, Handel G. Colour stability of provisional crown and bridge materials. Br Dent J 1998; 185:468-471.
8. Sau CW, Oh GS, Chee CS, Lim CC. Shear bond strength of repaired composite resins using a hybrid composite resin. Oper Dent 1999; 24:156-161.
9. Mitsaki-Matsou H, Karanika-Kouma A, Papadoyiannis Y, Theodoridou-Pahine S. An in vitro study of the tensile strength of composite resins repaired with the same or another composite resin. Quintessence Int 1991; 22:475-481.
10. Yap AU, Quek CE, Kau CH. Repair of new-generation tooth-colored restoratives: methods of surface conditioning to achieve bonding. Oper Dent 1998; 28:173-178.
11. Shahdad SA, Kennedy JG. Bond strength of repaired composite resins: an in vitro study. J Dent 1998; 26:685-694.
12. Brosh T, Pilo R, Bichacho N, Blutstein R. Effect of combinations of surface treatments and bonding agents on the bond strength of repaired composites. J Prosthet Dent 1997; 77:122-126.
13. Shortall AC, Baylis RL, Wilson HJ. Composite inlay/luring resin bond strength: surface treatment effects. J Dent 1996; 24:129-135.
14. Gregory WA, Berry S, Duke E, Dennison JB. Physical properties and repair bond strength of direct and indirect composite resins. J Prosthet Dent 1992; 68:406-411.
15. Söderholm KJ, Roberts MJ. Variables influencing the repair strength of dental composites. Scand J Dent Res 1991; 99:173-180.
16. van Noort R, Cardew GE, Howard IC, Noroozi S. The effect of local interfacial geometry on the measurement of the tensile bond strength to dentin. J Dent Res 1991; 70:889-893.