Time-dependent effects of EDTA on dentin structures

Journal of Endodontics

Volumn 28, Issue 1, 2002, Pages 17-19

  Çalt, Semra ^a   Serper, Ahmet ^a  

^a HACETTEPE UNIVERSITY   (Turkey)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

BIOMEDICAL AND DENTAL MATERIALS; CHELATING AGENT; EDETIC ACID; HYPOCHLORITE SODIUM; TOPICAL ANTIINFECTIVE AGENT;

ARTICLE; DENTAL SURGERY; DENTIN; DRUG EFFECT; ENDODONTICS; HUMAN; SCANNING ELECTRON MICROSCOPY; TIME; TOOTH PULP; ULTRASTRUCTURE;

ANTI-INFECTIVE AGENTS, LOCAL; CHELATING AGENTS; DENTAL PULP CAVITY; DENTIN; EDETIC ACID; HUMANS; MICROSCOPY, ELECTRON, SCANNING; ROOT CANAL IRRIGANTS; ROOT CANAL PREPARATION; SMEAR LAYER; SODIUM HYPOCHLORITE; TIME FACTORS;

EID: 0036363413     PISSN: 00992399     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1097/00004770-200201000-00004     Document Type: Article

References (16)

1. Ingle JI, Bakland LK, Peters DL, Buchanan LS, Mullaney TP. Endodontic Cavity Preparation. In: Ingle JI, Bakland LK, eds. Endodontics. 4th ed. Baltimore: Williams &Wilkins, 1994:180-4.
2. Sen BH, Wesselink PR, Türkün M. The smear layer: a phenomenon in root canal therapy. Int Endod J 1995;28:141-8.
3. White RR, Goldman M, Lin PS. The influence of the smeared layer upon dentinal tubule penetration by plastic filling materials. J Endodon 1984;10: 558-62. (Pubitemid 15199228)
4. White RR, Goldman M, Lin PS. The influence of the smeared layer upon dentinal tubule penetration by endodontic filling materials. Part II. J Endodon 1987;13:369-74.
5. Çalt S, Serper A. Dentinal tubule penetration of root canal sealers after root canal dressing with calcium hydroxide. J Endodon 1999;25:431-3.
6. Yamada RS, Armas A, Goldman M, Lin PS. A scanning electron microscopic comparison of a high volume final flush with several irrigating solutions. Part 3. J Endodon 1983;9:137-42.
7. Goldman M, Goldman LB, Cavaleri R, Bogis J, Lin PS. The efficacy of several irrigating solutions for endodontics: a scanning electron microscopic study. Part 2. J Endodon 1982;8:487-92.
8. Spangberg LSW. Instruments, materials, and devices. In: Cohen S, Burns RC, eds. Pathways of the pulp .7th ed. St. Louis: Mosby, Inc., 1998:507.
9. Goldberg F, Spielberg C. The effect of EDTAC and the variation of its working time analyzed with scanning electron microscopy. Oral Surg 1982; 53:74-7. (Pubitemid 12130260)
10. Garberoglio R, Becce C. Smear layer removal by root canal irrigants: a comparative scanning electron microscopic study. Oral Surg 1994;78:359-67.
11. Cury JA, Bragotto C, Valdrighi L. The demineralizing efficiency of EDTA solutions on dentin. Oral Surg 1981;52:446-8. (Pubitemid 12175352)
12. Baumgartner JC, Mader CL. A scanning electron microscopic evaluation of four root canal irrigation regimens. J Endodon 1987;13:147-57.
13. Cergneux M, Ciucchi B, Dietschi JM, Holz J. The influence of the smear layer on the sealing ability of canal obturation. Int Endod J 1987;20: 228-32.
14. Trowbridge HO, Kim S. Pulp development, structure, and function. In: Cohen S, Burns RC, eds. Pathways of the pulp .7th ed. St. Louis: Mosby, Inc., 1998:391-3.
15. Meryon SD, Tobias RS, Jakeman KJ. Smear removal agents: a quantitative study in vivo and in vitro. J Prosthet Dent 1987;20:174-9.
16. Kennedy WA, Walker WA, Gough RW. Smear layer removal effects on apical leakage. J Endodon 1986;12:21-7.