메뉴 건너뛰기




Volumn 17, Issue 7, 2002, Pages 546-555

Physician surveys to assess customary care in medical malpractice cases

Author keywords

Case vignettes; Customary care; Expert testimony; Malpractice; Survey research

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; COMMUNITY; CONTROLLED STUDY; DECISION MAKING; EVALUATION; FEASIBILITY STUDY; FEMALE; HUMAN; MALE; MALPRACTICE; MEDICAL CARE; MEDICAL SPECIALIST; NORMAL HUMAN; PATIENT REFERRAL; PHYSICIAN; PHYSICIAN ATTITUDE; PRIMARY MEDICAL CARE; RANDOMIZATION; WITNESS;

EID: 0036360429     PISSN: 08848734     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1046/j.1525-1497.2002.10740.x     Document Type: Article
Times cited : (13)

References (26)
  • 4
    • 85011920053 scopus 로고
    • Helling v. Carey: A landmark or exception in medical malpractice?
    • (1975) New Eng L Rev , vol.11 , pp. 301-312
    • Meltzer, N.1
  • 6
    • 0026274668 scopus 로고
    • The defensive effect of medical practice policies in malpractice litigation
    • (1991) Law Contemp Probs , vol.54 , pp. 119-145
    • Hall, M.A.1
  • 7
    • 85011920050 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Jones v. Chidester. Atlantic Reporter, 2nd Series, Vol 610. St. Paul, Minn: West Publishing, Inc.; 1992;964-70
  • 19
    • 0000586959 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • The quiet demise of deference to custom: Malpractice law at the millennium
    • (2000) Wash Lee L Rev , vol.57 , pp. 163-205
    • Peters, P.G.1
  • 26
    • 85011877218 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Federal rules of evidence. Rule 703


* 이 정보는 Elsevier사의 SCOPUS DB에서 KISTI가 분석하여 추출한 것입니다.